[04-May-2026 15:31:54 UTC] PHP Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Class 'WP_Widget' not found in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/widgets/mckeens_news_feed_widget.php:3
Stack trace:
#0 {main}
thrown in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/widgets/mckeens_news_feed_widget.php on line 3
[04-May-2026 15:31:55 UTC] PHP Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Class 'WP_Widget' not found in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/widgets/mckeens_sidebar_menu_widget.php:3
Stack trace:
#0 {main}
thrown in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/widgets/mckeens_sidebar_menu_widget.php on line 3
[04-May-2026 15:31:45 UTC] PHP Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to undefined function add_action() in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/shortcodes/mckeens_display_editorials.php:22
Stack trace:
#0 {main}
thrown in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/shortcodes/mckeens_display_editorials.php on line 22
[04-May-2026 15:31:46 UTC] PHP Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to undefined function add_action() in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/shortcodes/mckeens_display_tabs.php:50
Stack trace:
#0 {main}
thrown in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/shortcodes/mckeens_display_tabs.php on line 50
[04-May-2026 15:31:47 UTC] PHP Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to undefined function add_action() in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/shortcodes/mckeens_heading.php:15
Stack trace:
#0 {main}
thrown in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/shortcodes/mckeens_heading.php on line 15

Previous Ranking: 97, New Ranking: 24
Jiricek’s first year in North America (in the OHL) was all about adjustment and injury recovery. Now fully healthy, he’s been among the OHL’s best defenders and was named the top defenceman at this year’s WJC’s.
Previous Ranking: 178, New Ranking: 25
Started the year in the NHL with Pittsburgh before being sent back to the WHL post WJC’s. Brunicke is really figuring out how to get the best out of his vast athletic potential.

Previous Ranking: 102, New Ranking: 26
There was definitely some concern about how Lardis’ skill set would translate to the pro level given his frame. However, he’s been an immediate impact player and is rocketing up Chicago’s depth chart.
Previous Ranking: 222, New Ranking: 31
Talk about a breakout. Zharovsky took the KHL by storm in his draft plus one year. We knew he had among the highest upside of any forward in last year’s draft due to his creativity and skill, but we didn’t expect him to be fulfilling it so quickly.
Previous Ranking: 150, New Ranking: 43
Gridin was viewed as a boom or bust prospect who needed to round out his game to be a successful pro. He’s been terrific in the AHL as a rookie and has adjusted to the pro game way quicker than many expected.
Previous Ranking: 136, New Ranking: 47
Kantserov just continues to get better and has emerged as the best offensive player in the KHL. While the recent track record for KHL to NHL success is bleak, Kantserov has to be ranked highly because of the upside he possesses.
Previous Ranking: 175, New Ranking: 60
Even if the offensive production decreased post World Juniors, Horcoff still had a tremendous year that saw him emerge as one of the most dangerous players in college hockey between the dots.
Previous Ranking: 196, New Ranking: 68
Nestrasil was one of the better freshmen in the NCAA this year with UMass. He just keeps getting better and better and with his frame and IQ, he seems like a safe bet to be a quality NHL player so long as his skating continues to improve.

Previous Ranking: 181, New Ranking: 73
Murashov’s growth in his second year in North America has been prolific. He’s been lights out in the AHL and even earned a cup of coffee in the NHL. The future starter for the Penguins in all likelihood.
Previous Ranking: 207, New Ranking: 85
Has there been a prospect in hockey more annually underrated than Halliday? He’s the USHL all time leading scorer. He was great in college. He was great in the AHL. And he’s been great in limited NHL action.
Previous Ranking: 263, New Ranking: 87
We all owe Stramel an apology for writing him off so early after he initially struggled at Wisconsin. He was one of the best players in college hockey this season for Michigan State and is back on track to be a quality NHL player.
Max Plante (DET)Previous Ranking: 197, New Ranking: 90
Plante was great as a freshman at UMD, but he was even better as a sophomore, emerging as one of the NCAA’s best forwards and this year’s Hobey Baker winner.
Previous Ranking: 254, New Ranking: 96
What a difference a year can make. Letourneau was always going to be a long-term project, but he was written off by many after a rough freshman year. This year, he was one of BC’s best and most consistent players.
Previous Ranking: Not Ranked, New Ranking: 97
You might be asking yourself how the Lightning keep finding these guys to help keep them relevant. Rautiainen has exploded to be the top player in Liiga, a year after being drafted in the fourth round.
Previous Ranking: Not Ranked, New Ranking: 102
Drafted for his physical approach, Genborg has improved his on puck play significantly and was an impact player in the SHL this year.
Comparing the current ranking of prospects in our report to their previous ranking in our summer yearbook (which is a top 300), these are the affiliated prospects who have seen their stock fall the most this season.
Previous Ranking: 62, New Ranking: 147
While the KHL can be tough on young defenders, we keep waiting for Gulyayev’s breakout to happen. Instead, he’s had a regression this year and that has to be concerning to the Avalanche.
Previous Ranking: 84, New Ranking: Not Ranked
The only player to go from being ranked inside of our top 100 to being not ranked (outside of our top 200). Colangelo just hasn’t been able to get over the hump and establish himself as an NHL player.
Previous Ranking: 90, New Ranking: 177
His third pro season was supposed to be a breakout year for him, where he would finally establish himself as an NHL player. Instead, he’s had his worst year statistically and found himself in a new organization after a trade to Calgary.
Previous Ranking: 106, New Ranking: Not Ranked
Rehkopf had a pretty stagnant year in the OHL last year, but there was some hope that he could turn things around as a first year pro. Instead, a lack of consistency continues to plague him.
Previous Ranking: 108, New Ranking: 198
It’s starting to look like Roy’s NHL future may come with another organization. He’s seen himself passed by other forward prospects for a role in Montreal and his AHL production has stagnated.
| RNK | PLAYER | NHL | POS | AGE | HT/WT | TM | GP | G(W) | A(L) | PTS(GAA) | PIM(SPCT) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Michael Misa | SJ | C | 19 | 6-1/185 | San Jose (NHL) | 45 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 10 |
| 2 | Porter Martone | Phi | RW | 19 | 6-3/205 | Michigan State (NCAA) | 35 | 25 | 25 | 50 | 78 |
| 3 | Anton Frondell | Chi | C | 19 | 6-2/205 | Djurgardens (SHL) | 43 | 20 | 8 | 28 | 16 |
| 4 | Caleb Desnoyers | Uta | C | 19 | 6-2/180 | Moncton (QMJHL) | 45 | 22 | 56 | 78 | 36 |
| 5 | Zayne Parekh | Cgy | D | 20 | 6-0/180 | Calgary (NHL) | 37 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 8 |
| 6 | Brady Martin | Nsh | C | 19 | 6-0/185 | Soo Greyhounds (OHL) | 24 | 8 | 16 | 24 | 37 |
| 7 | Daniil But | Uta | LW | 21 | 6-6/215 | Utah (NHL) | 29 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 8 |
| 8 | Dmitri Simashev | Uta | D | 21 | 6-5/200 | Utah (NHL) | 28 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 23 |
| 9 | Jacob Fowler | Mtl | G | 21 | 6-1/215 | Laval (AHL) | 27 | 19 | 7 | 2.23 | 0.916 |
| 10 | Sebastian Cossa | Det | G | 23 | 6-6/230 | Grand Rapids (AHL) | 39 | 26 | 8 | 2.33 | 0.915 |
| 11 | Bradly Nadeau | Car | LW | 21 | 5-11/170 | Chicago (AHL) | 52 | 27 | 29 | 56 | 24 |
| 12 | Jake O'Brien | Sea | C | 18 | 6-2/175 | Brantford (OHL) | 53 | 28 | 65 | 93 | 28 |
| 13 | Tij Iginla | Uta | C | 19 | 6-0/190 | Kelowna (WHL) | 48 | 41 | 49 | 90 | 29 |
| 14 | Radim Mrtka | Buf | D | 18 | 6-6/220 | Seattle (WHL) | 43 | 1 | 33 | 34 | 38 |
| 15 | Igor Chernyshov | SJ | LW | 20 | 6-2/190 | San Jose (NHL) | 28 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 6 |
| 16 | Cole Hutson | Wsh | D | 19 | 5-10/165 | Boston University (NCAA) | 35 | 10 | 22 | 32 | 26 |
| 17 | James Hagens | Bos | C | 19 | 5-11/195 | Boston College (NCAA) | 34 | 23 | 24 | 47 | 24 |
| 18 | Konsta Helenius | Buf | C | 20 | 5-11/190 | Rochester (AHL) | 63 | 21 | 41 | 62 | 22 |
| 19 | Michael Hage | Mtl | C | 20 | 6-1/190 | Michigan (NCAA) | 39 | 13 | 39 | 52 | 14 |
| 20 | Roger McQueen | Ana | C | 19 | 6-6/195 | Providence (NCAA) | 36 | 11 | 16 | 27 | 45 |
| 21 | Gabe Perreault | NYR | LW | 21 | 5-11/180 | NY Rangers (NHL) | 49 | 12 | 15 | 27 | 10 |
| 22 | Sam Rinzel | Chi | D | 21 | 6-4/180 | Chicago (NHL) | 54 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 44 |
| 23 | Carter Yakemchuk | Ott | D | 20 | 6-3/210 | Belleville (AHL) | 54 | 10 | 30 | 40 | 36 |
| 24 | Adam Jiricek | StL | D | 19 | 6-2/180 | Brantford (OHL) | 55 | 19 | 40 | 59 | 33 |
| 25 | Harrison Brunicke | Pit | D | 20 | 6-3/195 | Kamloops (WHL) | 24 | 2 | 22 | 24 | 20 |
| 26 | Nick Lardis | Chi | LW | 20 | 5-11/165 | Chicago (NHL) | 41 | 10 | 5 | 15 | 10 |
| 27 | Nate Danielson | Det | C | 21 | 6-2/185 | Detroit (NHL) | 28 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| 28 | Yegor Surin | Nsh | C | 19 | 6-1/190 | Lokomotiv Yaroslavl (KHL) | 57 | 15 | 22 | 37 | 43 |
| 29 | Braeden Cootes | Van | C | 19 | 6-0/185 | Sea-PA (WHL) | 45 | 24 | 39 | 63 | 8 |
| 30 | Jackson Smith | CBJ | D | 19 | 6-4/200 | Penn State (NCAA) | 35 | 11 | 15 | 26 | 40 |
| 31 | Alexander Zharovsky | Mtl | RW | 19 | 6-1/165 | Salavat Yulaev Ufa (KHL) | 59 | 16 | 26 | 42 | 38 |
| 32 | Victor Eklund | NYI | RW | 19 | 5-11/170 | Djurgardens (SHL) | 43 | 6 | 18 | 24 | 22 |
| 33 | Jonathan Lekkerimaki | Van | RW | 21 | 5-11/170 | Abbotsford (AHL) | 21 | 13 | 7 | 20 | 8 |
| 34 | Scott Morrow | NYR | D | 23 | 6-2/210 | NY Rangers (NHL) | 29 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| 35 | Kashawn Aitcheson | NYI | D | 19 | 6-2/200 | Barrie (OHL) | 56 | 28 | 42 | 70 | 97 |
| 36 | Liam Greentree | NYR | RW | 20 | 6-3/215 | Windsor (OHL) | 52 | 38 | 36 | 74 | 63 |
| 37 | Tanner Molendyk | Nsh | D | 21 | 5-11/185 | Milwaukee (AHL) | 60 | 4 | 19 | 23 | 14 |
| 38 | Justin Carbonneau | StL | RW | 19 | 6-2/205 | Blainville-Boisbriand (QMJHL) | 60 | 51 | 29 | 80 | 64 |
| 39 | Ilya Protas | Wsh | LW | 19 | 6-3/185 | Hershey (AHL) | 69 | 29 | 37 | 66 | 40 |
| 40 | Cole Reschny | Cgy | C | 19 | 5-11/185 | North Dakota (NCAA) | 36 | 6 | 29 | 35 | 22 |
| 41 | Anton Silayev | NJ | D | 20 | 6-7/210 | Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod (KHL) | 61 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 |
| 42 | Rutger McGroarty | Pit | LW | 22 | 6-1/200 | Pittsburgh (NHL) | 24 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 4 |
| 43 | Matvei Gridin | Cgy | RW | 20 | 6-2/190 | Calgary (NHL) | 37 | 6 | 14 | 20 | 2 |
| 44 | Isak Rosen | Wpg | RW | 23 | 6-0/175 | Buf-Wpg (NHL) | 37 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 0 |
| 45 | Cole Eiserman | NYI | LW | 19 | 6-0/195 | Boston University (NCAA) | 32 | 18 | 10 | 28 | 14 |
| 46 | Andrew Cristall | Wsh | LW | 21 | 5-9/165 | Hershey (AHL) | 72 | 20 | 40 | 60 | 24 |
| 47 | Roman Kantserov | Chi | RW | 21 | 5-9/175 | Metallurg Magnitogorsk (KHL) | 63 | 36 | 28 | 64 | 57 |
| 48 | Jani Nyman | Sea | RW | 21 | 6-3/215 | Seattle (NHL) | 28 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 6 |
| 49 | Michael Brandsegg-Nygard | Det | RW | 20 | 6-1/205 | Grand Rapids (AHL) | 60 | 20 | 24 | 44 | 42 |
| 50 | Quentin Musty | SJ | LW | 20 | 6-2/200 | San Jose (AHL) | 61 | 21 | 24 | 45 | 46 |
| 51 | Jett Luchanko | Phi | C | 19 | 5-11/185 | Gue-Bfd (OHL) | 38 | 7 | 36 | 43 | 34 |
| 52 | Cayden Lindstrom | CBJ | C | 20 | 6-3/215 | Michigan State (NCAA) | 31 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 94 |
| 53 | Trevor Connelly | VGK | LW | 20 | 6-1/160 | Henderson (AHL) | 46 | 14 | 35 | 49 | 18 |
| 54 | Jagger Firkus | Sea | RW | 22 | 5-11/160 | Coachella Valley (AHL) | 63 | 21 | 35 | 56 | 18 |
| 55 | Isaac Howard | Edm | LW | 22 | 5-11/190 | Bakersfield (AHL) | 47 | 24 | 26 | 50 | 12 |
| 56 | Lynden Lakovic | Wsh | LW | 19 | 6-4/200 | Moose Jaw (WHL) | 22 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 8 |
| 57 | David Reinbacher | Mtl | D | 21 | 6-2/185 | Laval (AHL) | 57 | 5 | 19 | 24 | 56 |
| 58 | Trey Augustine | Det | G | 21 | 6-1/195 | Michigan State (NCAA) | 34 | 24 | 9 | 2.11 | 0.929 |
| 59 | Yegor Zavragin | Phi | G | 20 | 6-2/185 | SKA St. Petersburg (KHL) | 12 | 5 | 7 | 2.63 | 0.919 |
| 60 | Will Horcoff | Pit | C | 19 | 6-5/200 | Michigan (NCAA) | 40 | 25 | 14 | 39 | 64 |
| 61 | Reid Schaefer | Nsh | LW | 22 | 6-3/215 | Nashville (NHL) | 47 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 17 |
| 62 | Sam O'Reilly | TB | C | 20 | 6-1/190 | Ldn-Kit (OHL) | 56 | 29 | 42 | 71 | 22 |
| 63 | Otto Stenberg | StL | C | 21 | 5-11/180 | St. Louis (NHL) | 32 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 5 |
| 64 | Brayden Yager | Wpg | C | 21 | 6-0/180 | Manitoba (AHL) | 68 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 10 |
| 65 | Joshua Ravensbergen | SJ | G | 19 | 6-6/190 | Prince George (WHL) | 46 | 32 | 13 | 2.51 | 0.919 |
| 66 | Cole Beaudoin | Uta | C | 20 | 6-2/210 | Barrie (OHL) | 54 | 33 | 56 | 89 | 29 |
| 67 | Michael Hrabal | Uta | G | 21 | 6-7/215 | Massachusetts (NCAA) | 29 | 19 | 9 | 1.95 | 0.937 |
| 68 | Vaclav Nestrasil | Chi | RW | 19 | 6-6/185 | Massachusetts (NCAA) | 34 | 13 | 18 | 31 | 8 |
| 69 | Stian Solberg | Ana | D | 20 | 6-2/205 | San Diego (AHL) | 71 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 102 |
| 70 | Maveric Lamoureux | Uta | D | 22 | 6-7/215 | Tucson (AHL) | 65 | 5 | 15 | 20 | 75 |
| 71 | Sascha Boumedienne | Wpg | D | 19 | 6-2/185 | Boston University (NCAA) | 35 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 14 |
| 72 | Adam Engstrom | Mtl | D | 22 | 6-2/185 | Laval (AHL) | 45 | 10 | 24 | 34 | 18 |
| 73 | Sergei Murashov | Pit | G | 22 | 6-0/170 | Wilkes-Barre (AHL) | 38 | 24 | 9 | 2.20 | 0.919 |
| 74 | Owen Pickering | Pit | D | 22 | 6-4/180 | Wilkes-Barre (AHL) | 68 | 7 | 21 | 28 | 28 |
| 75 | Pyotr Andreyanov | CBJ | G | 19 | 6-0/205 | Krasnaya Armiya Moskva (MHL) | 26 | 13 | 8 | 2.59 | 0.919 |
| 76 | Elias Salomonsson | Wpg | D | 21 | 6-1/185 | Winnipeg (NHL) | 32 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 12 |
| 77 | Shakir Mukhamadullin | SJ | D | 24 | 6-4/200 | San Jose (NHL) | 50 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 22 |
| 78 | Tristan Luneau | Ana | D | 22 | 6-1/195 | San Diego (AHL) | 70 | 10 | 31 | 41 | 29 |
| 79 | Carter Bear | Det | LW | 19 | 6-0/180 | Everett (WHL) | 53 | 36 | 41 | 77 | 56 |
| 80 | Filip Bystedt | SJ | C | 22 | 6-4/205 | San Jose (AHL) | 65 | 22 | 38 | 60 | 22 |
| 81 | Sacha Boisvert | Chi | C | 20 | 6-3/190 | Boston University (NCAA) | 26 | 3 | 14 | 17 | 28 |
| 82 | Julius Miettinen | Sea | C | 20 | 6-3/200 | Everett (WHL) | 52 | 35 | 41 | 76 | 29 |
| 83 | Theo Lindstein | StL | D | 21 | 6-0/180 | Springfield (AHL) | 59 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 18 |
| 84 | Cullen Potter | Cgy | C | 19 | 5-10/170 | Arizona State (NCAA) | 24 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 16 |
| 85 | Stephen Halliday | Ott | C | 23 | 6-4/210 | Ottawa (NHL) | 30 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 2 |
| 86 | Marek Vanacker | Chi | LW | 20 | 6-0/175 | Brantford (OHL) | 60 | 47 | 35 | 82 | 33 |
| 87 | Charlie Stramel | Min | C | 21 | 6-3/215 | Michigan State (NCAA) | 37 | 19 | 25 | 44 | 32 |
| 88 | Alex Bump | Phi | LW | 22 | 6-0/195 | Lehigh Valley (AHL) | 36 | 11 | 15 | 26 | 22 |
| 89 | Oscar Fisker Molgaard | Sea | C | 21 | 6-0/165 | Coachella Valley (AHL) | 49 | 10 | 24 | 34 | 12 |
| 90 | Max Plante | Det | LW | 20 | 5-11/175 | Minnesota Duluth (NCAA) | 40 | 25 | 27 | 52 | 23 |
| 91 | Seamus Casey | NJ | D | 22 | 5-10/165 | Utica (AHL) | 29 | 1 | 18 | 19 | 13 |
| 92 | Jack Nesbitt | Phi | C | 19 | 6-5/185 | Windsor (OHL) | 55 | 25 | 33 | 58 | 67 |
| 93 | Mikhail Yegorov | NJ | G | 20 | 6-5/190 | Boston University (NCAA) | 35 | 16 | 15 | 2.73 | 0.904 |
| 94 | Luca Del Bel Belluz | CBJ | C | 22 | 6-1/185 | Cleveland (AHL) | 55 | 22 | 36 | 58 | 2 |
| 95 | Ilya Nabokov | Col | G | 23 | 6-0/180 | Metallurg Magnitogorsk (KHL) | 38 | 22 | 7 | 2.74 | 0.901 |
| 96 | Dean Letourneau | Bos | C | 20 | 6-7/215 | Boston College (NCAA) | 36 | 22 | 17 | 39 | 22 |
| 97 | Benjamin Rautiainen | TB | C | 20 | 6-0/175 | Tappara (Fin-Liiga) | 59 | 25 | 52 | 77 | 20 |
| 98 | Drew Commesso | Chi | G | 23 | 6-2/180 | Rockford (AHL) | 37 | 13 | 20 | 3.08 | 0.901 |
| 99 | Bill Zonnon | Pit | RW | 19 | 6-2/185 | Blainville-Boisbriand (QMJHL) | 35 | 14 | 32 | 46 | 6 |
| 100 | Riley Heidt | Min | C | 21 | 5-10/180 | Iowa (AHL) | 71 | 8 | 17 | 25 | 38 |
| 101 | Juraj Pekarcik | StL | LW | 20 | 6-2/185 | Springfield (AHL) | 69 | 11 | 24 | 35 | 10 |
| 102 | Eddie Genborg | Det | RW | 19 | 6-2/205 | Timra (SHL) | 43 | 9 | 16 | 25 | 24 |
| 103 | Owen Beck | Mtl | C | 22 | 5-11/185 | Laval (AHL) | 58 | 13 | 20 | 33 | 28 |
| 104 | Oliver Bonk | Phi | D | 21 | 6-2/195 | Lehigh Valley (AHL) | 46 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 22 |
| 105 | Luca Cagnoni | SJ | D | 21 | 5-9/180 | San Jose (AHL) | 67 | 8 | 35 | 43 | 22 |
| 106 | Cameron Reid | Nsh | D | 19 | 6-0/190 | Kitchener (OHL) | 57 | 15 | 41 | 56 | 29 |
| 107 | Eric Pohlkamp | SJ | D | 22 | 5-11/205 | Denver (NCAA) | 43 | 18 | 21 | 39 | 33 |
| 108 | Lenni Hameenaho | NJ | RW | 21 | 6-0/175 | New Jersey (NHL) | 33 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 14 |
| 109 | Felix Unger Sorum | Car | RW | 20 | 5-11/170 | Chicago (AHL) | 72 | 17 | 49 | 66 | 20 |
| 110 | Milton Gastrin | Wsh | C | 18 | 6-1/195 | MoDo Hockey (Allsvenskan) | 39 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 4 |
| 111 | Carter George | LA | G | 20 | 6-1/195 | OS-Soo (OHL) | 46 | 23 | 17 | 2.73 | 0.907 |
| 112 | Samuel Honzek | Cgy | LW | 21 | 6-4/185 | Calgary (NHL) | 18 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| 113 | Dmitri Buchelnikov | StL | LW | 22 | 5-10/170 | CSKA Moskva (KHL) | 44 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 10 |
| 114 | Ryker Lee | Nsh | RW | 19 | 6-1/185 | Michigan State (NCAA) | 35 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 26 |
| 115 | Hunter Brzustewicz | Cgy | D | 21 | 5-11/185 | Calgary (NHL) | 34 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| 116 | Terik Parascak | Wsh | RW | 20 | 6-0/180 | Prince George (WHL) | 61 | 33 | 46 | 79 | 53 |
| 117 | EJ Emery | NYR | D | 20 | 6-3/185 | North Dakota (NCAA) | 38 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 32 |
| 118 | Logan Hensler | Ott | D | 19 | 6-3/195 | Wisconsin (NCAA) | 23 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 20 |
| 119 | Emil Hemming | Dal | RW | 19 | 6-1/205 | Barrie (OHL) | 46 | 26 | 37 | 63 | 22 |
| 120 | Blake Fiddler | Sea | D | 18 | 6-5/220 | Edmonton (WHL) | 63 | 11 | 25 | 36 | 38 |
| 121 | Jakob Ihs Wozniak | VGK | RW | 19 | 6-3/190 | Bjorkloven (Allsvenskan) | 36 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 12 |
| 122 | Cameron Lund | SJ | C | 21 | 6-2/195 | San Jose (AHL) | 37 | 9 | 16 | 25 | 12 |
| 123 | Ville Koivunen | Pit | LW | 22 | 6-0/175 | Pittsburgh (NHL) | 39 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 10 |
| 124 | Artyom Duda | Uta | D | 22 | 6-1/185 | Tucson (AHL) | 27 | 2 | 11 | 13 | 22 |
| 125 | Ivan Miroshnichenko | Wsh | LW | 22 | 6-1/185 | Hershey (AHL) | 41 | 14 | 20 | 34 | 47 |
| 126 | Gracyn Sawchyn | Fla | C | 21 | 5-11/160 | Charlotte (AHL) | 35 | 6 | 17 | 23 | 12 |
| 127 | Jack Ivankovic | Nsh | G | 19 | 6-0/175 | Michigan (NCAA) | 35 | 25 | 8 | 2.15 | 0.921 |
| 128 | Denver Barkey | Phi | C | 21 | 5-8/160 | Philadelphia (NHL) | 43 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 16 |
| 129 | Bryce Pickford | Mtl | D | 20 | 6-1/185 | Medicine Hat (WHL) | 55 | 45 | 38 | 83 | 56 |
| 130 | Leo Sahlin Wallenius | SJ | D | 20 | 6-0/180 | Vaxjo Lakers (SHL) | 32 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 14 |
| 131 | Niklas Kokko | Sea | G | 22 | 6-3/185 | Coachella Valley (AHL) | 35 | 19 | 10 | 3.13 | 0.901 |
| 132 | Kieron Walton | Wpg | C | 20 | 6-6/210 | Sby-Pbo (OHL) | 62 | 40 | 48 | 88 | 26 |
| 133 | Ryan Ufko | Nsh | D | 23 | 5-10/180 | Milwaukee (AHL) | 52 | 11 | 33 | 44 | 20 |
| 134 | Tarin Smith | Ana | D | 20 | 6-1/185 | Everett (WHL) | 65 | 16 | 55 | 71 | 98 |
| 135 | Semyon Vyazovoy | Sea | G | 23 | 6-2/170 | Salavat Yulayev Ufa (Rus) | 53 | 27 | 18 | 2.13 | 0.931 |
| 136 | Anton Wahlberg | Buf | C | 20 | 6-3/195 | Rochester (AHL) | 68 | 9 | 29 | 38 | 20 |
| 137 | Tyson Jugnauth | Sea | D | 22 | 5-11/170 | Coachella Valley (AHL) | 72 | 9 | 36 | 45 | 44 |
| 138 | David Edstrom | Nsh | C | 21 | 6-3/185 | Milwaukee (AHL) | 53 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 28 |
| 139 | David Spacek | Min | D | 23 | 5-11/175 | Iowa (AHL) | 59 | 7 | 29 | 36 | 16 |
| 140 | Carl Lindbom | VGK | G | 23 | 6-1/165 | Henderson (AHL) | 35 | 24 | 5 | 2.16 | 0.926 |
| 141 | Brad Lambert | Wpg | C | 22 | 6-0/180 | Winnipeg (NHL) | 25 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 6 |
| 142 | Amadeus Lombardi | Det | C | 22 | 5-10/165 | Grand Rapids (AHL) | 47 | 16 | 26 | 42 | 22 |
| 143 | Ethan Gauthier | TB | RW | 21 | 5-11/175 | Syracuse (AHL) | 56 | 12 | 15 | 27 | 10 |
| 144 | Henry Mews | Cgy | D | 20 | 6-0/190 | Michigan (NCAA) | 10 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 6 |
| 145 | Eric Nilson | Ana | C | 19 | 6-0/165 | Michigan State (NCAA) | 35 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 41 |
| 146 | Ben Danford | Tor | D | 20 | 6-1/190 | Osh-Bfd (OHL) | 45 | 3 | 17 | 20 | 13 |
| 147 | Mikhail Gulyayev | Col | D | 21 | 5-11/170 | Avangard Omsk (KHL) | 54 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 14 |
| 148 | Henry Brzustewicz | LA | D | 19 | 6-2/200 | London (OHL) | 59 | 19 | 35 | 54 | 57 |
| 149 | Joakim Kemell | Nsh | RW | 22 | 5-10/185 | Milwaukee (AHL) | 48 | 10 | 19 | 29 | 56 |
| 150 | Danny Nelson | NYI | C | 20 | 6-3/200 | Notre Dame (NCAA) | 36 | 13 | 16 | 29 | 32 |
| 151 | Luca Marrelli | CBJ | D | 20 | 6-2/185 | Cleveland (AHL) | 32 | 4 | 12 | 16 | 10 |
| 152 | Dylan Duke | TB | LW | 23 | 5-10/180 | Syracuse (AHL) | 72 | 32 | 27 | 59 | 42 |
| 153 | Jack Devine | Fla | RW | 22 | 5-11/175 | Charlotte (AHL) | 63 | 18 | 25 | 43 | 57 |
| 154 | Daniil Prokhorov | NYI | RW | 19 | 6-6/220 | Dynamo Moskva (KHL) | 23 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 155 | William Zellers | Bos | LW | 20 | 6-0/180 | North Dakota (NCAA) | 38 | 18 | 16 | 34 | 29 |
| 156 | Ethan Wyttenbach | Cgy | LW | 19 | 5-10/180 | Quinnipiac (NCAA) | 40 | 25 | 34 | 59 | 20 |
| 157 | Eduard Sale | Sea | LW | 21 | 6-1/170 | Coachella Valley (AHL) | 58 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 14 |
| 158 | Dmitry Gamzin | NYI | G | 23 | 6-3/175 | CSKA Moskva (KHL) | 40 | 22 | 10 | 1.49 | 0.938 |
| 159 | Kasper Halttunen | SJ | RW | 20 | 6-3/205 | San Jose (AHL) | 69 | 16 | 19 | 35 | 45 |
| 160 | Lukas Fischer | StL | D | 19 | 6-3/180 | Sar-Soo (OHL) | 65 | 8 | 36 | 44 | 88 |
| 161 | Semyon Frolov | Car | G | 19 | 6-3/200 | MHK Spartak Moskva (MHL) | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1.83 | 0.929 |
| 162 | Fabian Lysell | Bos | RW | 23 | 5-11/180 | Providence (AHL) | 57 | 17 | 25 | 42 | 51 |
| 163 | Mason West | Chi | C | 18 | 6-7/220 | Fargo (USHL) | 38 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 12 |
| 164 | Shane Vansaghi | Phi | RW | 19 | 6-3/210 | Michigan State (NCAA) | 35 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 28 |
| 165 | Dominik Badinka | Car | D | 20 | 6-3/185 | Chicago (AHL) | 68 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 16 |
| 166 | Lucas Pettersson | Ana | C | 20 | 6-0/175 | Brynas (SHL) | 41 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 0 |
| 167 | Sawyer Mynio | Van | D | 21 | 6-1/175 | Abbotsford (AHL) | 58 | 3 | 18 | 21 | 42 |
| 168 | Lukas Cormier | VGK | D | 24 | 5-11/190 | Henderson (AHL) | 49 | 8 | 39 | 47 | 32 |
| 169 | Quinn Hutson | Edm | RW | 24 | 5-10/170 | Bakersfield (AHL) | 67 | 30 | 33 | 63 | 84 |
| 170 | Vojtech Cihar | LA | LW | 19 | 6-1/180 | Kelowna (WHL) | 31 | 12 | 19 | 31 | 14 |
| 171 | Heikki Ruohonen | Phi | C | 19 | 6-1/205 | Harvard (NCAA) | 28 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 18 |
| 172 | Tristan Broz | Pit | C | 23 | 6-0/180 | Wilkes-Barre (AHL) | 47 | 16 | 23 | 39 | 41 |
| 173 | Maksymilian Szuber | Uta | D | 23 | 6-3/190 | Tucson (AHL) | 65 | 11 | 16 | 27 | 67 |
| 174 | Kirill Kudryavtsev | Van | D | 22 | 5-11/200 | Abbotsford (AHL) | 44 | 2 | 18 | 20 | 4 |
| 175 | Adam Gajan | Chi | G | 22 | 6-3/185 | Minnesota Duluth (NCAA) | 33 | 19 | 13 | 2.25 | 0.908 |
| 176 | Hampton Slukynsky | LA | G | 20 | 6-1/180 | Western Michigan (NCAA) | 39 | 27 | 11 | 2.30 | 0.915 |
| 177 | Brennan Othmann | Cgy | LW | 23 | 6-0/190 | Hfd-Cgy (AHL) | 40 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 62 |
| 178 | Lasse Boelius | Ana | D | 19 | 6-1/190 | Assat (Fin-Liiga) | 40 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 8 |
| 179 | Colby Barlow | Wpg | LW | 21 | 6-0/195 | Manitoba (AHL) | 65 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 18 |
| 180 | Charlie Cerrato | Car | C | 21 | 6-0/190 | Penn State (NCAA) | 23 | 7 | 20 | 27 | 20 |
| 181 | Cole McKinney | SJ | C | 19 | 6-0/200 | Michigan (NCAA) | 40 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 28 |
| 182 | Michal Postava | Det | G | 24 | 6-2/205 | Grand Rapids (AHL) | 25 | 17 | 6 | 1.71 | 0.937 |
| 183 | Justin Robidas | Car | C | 23 | 5-8/175 | Chicago (AHL) | 58 | 23 | 37 | 60 | 14 |
| 184 | Ty Nelson | Sea | D | 22 | 5-10/195 | Coachella Valley (AHL) | 63 | 11 | 24 | 35 | 26 |
| 185 | Carson Wetsch | SJ | RW | 20 | 6-1/205 | Kelowna (WHL) | 65 | 22 | 50 | 72 | 80 |
| 186 | Vsevolod Komarov | Buf | D | 22 | 6-2/182 | Rochester (AHL) | 55 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 60 |
| 187 | Dylan Roobroeck | NYR | C | 21 | 6-6/190 | Hartford (AHL) | 72 | 11 | 15 | 26 | 90 |
| 188 | Luca Pinelli | CBJ | C | 21 | 5-9/165 | Cleveland (AHL) | 68 | 14 | 32 | 46 | 66 |
| 189 | Tim Washe | Ana | C | 24 | 6-3/215 | Anaheim (NHL) | 39 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 14 |
| 190 | Aiden Fink | Nsh | RW | 21 | 5-10/160 | Penn State (NCAA) | 30 | 10 | 28 | 38 | 20 |
| 191 | Florian Xhekaj | Mtl | LW | 21 | 6-2/175 | Laval (AHL) | 64 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 182 |
| 192 | Carter Mazur | Det | LW | 24 | 6-0/170 | Grand Rapids (AHL) | 16 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 14 |
| 193 | Brodie Ziemer | Buf | RW | 20 | 5-11/195 | Minnesota (NCAA) | 36 | 23 | 13 | 36 | 26 |
| 194 | Nathan Behm | Chi | RW | 19 | 6-2/200 | Kamloops (WHL) | 67 | 38 | 48 | 86 | 41 |
| 195 | Ivan Ryabkin | Car | C | 19 | 5-11/205 | Chicago (AHL) | 31 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 60 |
| 196 | Jacob Quillan | Tor | C | 24 | 6-1/205 | Toronto (NHL) | 23 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| 197 | Herman Traff | Ana | RW | 20 | 6-3/215 | Oskarshamn (Allsvenskan) | 51 | 23 | 18 | 41 | 32 |
| 198 | Joshua Roy | Mtl | RW | 22 | 6-0/190 | Laval (AHL) | 57 | 23 | 22 | 45 | 32 |
| 199 | Sandis Vilmanis | Fla | LW | 22 | 6-1/190 | Charlotte (AHL) | 48 | 17 | 21 | 38 | 26 |
| 200 | Miroslav Holinka | Tor | C | 20 | 6-1/185 | Edmonton (WHL) | 59 | 37 | 43 | 80 | 24 |

After their surprise run to the Stanley Cup Final in the COVID-shortened 2020-21 season, the Canadiens missed the playoffs for three straight years before returning in 2024-25, where they were eliminated in the first round. Now, Montreal appears to be entering its true competitive window, with Nick Suzuki and Cole Caufield in their prime years and a new wave of emerging talent led by Ivan Demidov, Lane Hutson, and Jacob Fowler. The prospects in this system will either push their way into that core or develop into important supporting pieces as the Canadiens work toward their 25th Stanley Cup championship.
Hage has emerged as the best long-term center prospect in Montreal’s system. His game is driven by strong skating and high-end offensive awareness, allowing him to push pace through the neutral zone while consistently identifying and creating scoring opportunities. He processes the game quickly and uses subtle puck movement to manipulate defenders, traits that have translated into a standout NCAA season where he currently ranks sixth in points per game and has helped lead Michigan to the number one ranking in the country heading into the Frozen Four.
His pNHLe has climbed to around 80, suggesting legitimate top-six offensive potential, even if that level may come in peaks rather than sustained production. The bigger question for Montreal is whether Hage can solidify himself as their long-term second-line center, a role he is currently the best internal candidate to fill. While his development will still require patience, his trajectory, production, and underlying tools point to a player whose value could continue to rise, making him an appealing target in dynasty formats if there is still any skepticism tied to his timeline.
Zharovsky brings one of the more exciting offensive skill sets in Montreal’s pipeline, combining high-end puck handling with excellent edgework to create separation in tight areas and generate chances both off the rush and in sustained offensive-zone play. His creativity and ability to manipulate defenders make him a constant offensive threat, though like many skill-driven wingers, his long-term success will depend on continuing to refine his decision-making and consistency against higher levels of competition.
After not appearing in the KHL last season, Zharovsky has broken out in his draft-plus-one year with Salavat Yulaev Ufa, posting 41 points in 58 games, the top point-per-game mark among teenage players in the league. That performance has fueled a dramatic rise in his Hockey Prospecting profile, with his star probability jumping from 18% to 48%, a rare leap that signals legitimate upside. With that kind of trajectory, he is quickly becoming one of the more appealing high-upside targets in dynasty formats and a prospect worth investing in before his value climbs further.
Pickford is in the midst of an excellent draft-plus-one season, currently leading WHL defensemen in points-per-game for the Medicine Hat Tigers. His production has been backed by strong underlying metrics, as his Fantasy Hockey Life skater card highlights strengths across play driving, transition, and puck battles, pointing to a well-rounded offensive profile rather than just inflated scoring totals.
He stands out as an offensive-minded defense prospect whose style translates well to fantasy formats. Pickford consistently activates into the play, joins the rush, and looks to create shooting lanes from the blue line, using his mobility to stay involved while maintaining enough defensive structure. If that offensive confidence and versatility carry over to higher levels and he earns power-play deployment, he has the potential to become a fantasy-relevant contributor from the back end.
Reinbacher is still widely viewed as one of Montreal’s safest defense prospects, and for good reason. He plays a composed, efficient two-way game, defends well, moves the puck cleanly, and brings the size and mobility NHL teams want in a top-four blueliner. He should help the Canadiens play more structured, reliable hockey as he matures, which gives him clear real-life value within the organization.
For dynasty managers, though, the concern is his offensive ceiling. Reinbacher’s game is built more on stability and efficiency than high-end creativity, and his pNHLe has trended downward since his draft year. His play-driving metrics in the AHL have also been poor, which adds another layer of concern when projecting his long-term fantasy upside. That does not mean he lacks value, but it does make it less likely that he develops into a strong fantasy asset, especially in formats that do not reward peripheral contributions. If his current dynasty value still reflects expectations of notable power-play production or top-end scoring from the back end, this may be the right time to sell before his profile settles in as a dependable but lower-scoring NHL defenseman.
Beck has built a reputation as one of the more dependable two-way centers in Montreal’s prospect system. His strengths include faceoff ability, responsible defensive play, and strong positioning across all three zones, all traits that tend to earn trust from coaches. He has also been a reasonable producer in the AHL, which supports the view that he can become a useful NHL player. Still, his profile points more toward a reliable, play-driving bottom-six center than an offensive focal point.
For dynasty purposes, that limits the appeal. Hockey Prospecting gives him a zero percent chance of becoming a star, which may be a little harsh, but its NHLer probability has him at nearly a 50% chance of playing 200 games, a mark that feels realistic. Beck should have real-life value if he becomes the type of center who can drive play, handle tough minutes, and stabilize a lower line, but that role does not usually translate into strong fantasy value unless the league is especially deep. If another manager still views him as a potential top-six offensive contributor, this could be a good time to explore moving him.
Mooney is one of the more entertaining skill prospects in Montreal’s system, relying on creativity, puckhandling, and offensive flair to generate scoring chances. He is tenacious, competes hard in every situation, and plays with the kind of energy that makes him easy to root for. His Fantasy Hockey Life skater card also highlights how effective he is in several key areas, especially puck battles won and loose-puck recoveries, which are particularly important traits for a smaller player trying to overcome physical disadvantages. Those details help explain why he has become such an intriguing prospect despite his lack of size.
That said, it is still difficult to ignore his stature. At just 5-foot-8, the barrier to entry to the NHL remains immense, and projecting smaller skill forwards into meaningful scoring roles always carries added uncertainty. As the competition gets stronger, faster, and more physical, players who rely on finesse have to consistently prove they can create space and hold up against bigger defenders. I would love to see Mooney succeed, but the odds are still working against him, and if his current dynasty value already reflects a top-six offensive projection, this may be the prudent time to sell while optimism remains high.
| Player | Role | Key Insight |
| Michael Hage | Buy | Skilled center with strong offensive-driver potential |
| Alexander Zharovsky | Buy | Creative winger with under-the-radar upside |
| Bryce Pickford | Buy | Offensive-minded defense prospect worth monitoring |
| David Reinbacher | Sell | Excellent real-life defender but uncertain fantasy ceiling |
| Owen Beck | Sell | Reliable center whose role may limit scoring output |
| LJ Mooney | Sell | High-skill prospect with significant projection risk |
]]>
Here are the European-based prospects:
Heading into the 2025 Draft, Zharovsky was seen as one of the classes’ ultimate boom/bust candidates. His individual skill and creativity made him one of the draft’s top playmakers and a player who possessed significant offensive upside. However, there were some concerns that his lack of dynamic skating in combination with a slight frame, could make him a bit of a longer term project who could struggle to adapt to the KHL level, let alone the NHL level.
A few months into the KHL season and those concerns have quickly evaporated. Zharovsky has emerged as one of the top young forwards in Russia. As a KHL rookie, he currently leads Salavat Yulaev Ufa in scoring and among U20 players, only Yegor Surin has more points, with Zharovsky possessing the higher point per game average. Historically, if he can keep this pace, he would set the new point per game record for a U19 player in the KHL, besting the likes of Evgeny Kuznetsov, Matvei Michkov, Vladimir Tarasenko, and Kirill Kaprizov. Talk about a quick adaptation to the pro ranks.
So, what’s driving his success so far at the KHL level? Truthfully, it’s that his hands are so good that he’s able to overcome some shortcomings to be an offensive contributor. He doesn’t lack confidence, even as a KHL rookie. Offensive zone turnovers are somewhat commonplace at the moment as he tries to take on multiple defenders in an effort to play through them…and he’s just not quick enough or strong enough to win those battles consistently at the moment. However, not all of his deke attempts fail and he’s been able to get by defenders or extend possession with his creative approach. This is partly why a large part of his offensive success this year has come with the man advantage. He’s operating the left point for Salavat’s top unit and rotating down into the left flank. From here, he’s doing a good job finding seams and getting pucks to the middle of the ice. He’s also showcasing an improved shot, which is giving him a better outlook as a goal scorer moving forward.
Zharovsky’s agility and ability to play off his edges also looks improved, helping to make him elusive even at the KHL level against men. There’s unquestionably still room for him to upgrade both his first step quickness and top linear speed, but he’s creating some opportunities with speed and gaining the zone, blending his hands and agility.
It would probably be in Montreal’s best interest to leave Zharovsky in the KHL for another season or two, allowing him to further upgrade his physical tools, all the while building even greater confidence and awareness with the puck. However, this season has certainly been a successful one, helping to establish Zharovsky as one of the highest upside prospects playing in Europe right now.
Zharovsky shows off his elusiveness and edgework by escaping pressure to gain the offensive zone.
Zharovsky has shown a willingness to get to the net in the KHL and this is another example of his hands and smarts affording him transitional opportunities, even without elite level speed.
This is what Zharovsky can do playing against his peers right now. Slips a defender, sells shot, and then finds the open man for the one timer on the left flank.
When the Bruins drafted Blanar in the fourth-round last year, it made a lot of people say…”who?” This included us, with Blanar, admittedly, not even on our radar. He was playing at a lower U18 level, a league that just doesn’t normally get draft attention. But kudos to the Bruins’ Swedish and European scouts, they may just have found something here.
This season Blanar transferred to the much more well known HV71 program and has played the majority of the season for the team’s U20 program, where he leads the team in defensive scoring. He’s also seen spot duty with the club team in the SHL, a pretty remarkable step up from his competition last year.
The recent commit to UMass, and recent nominee to the Czech World Junior roster is a highly intriguing prospect because of his frame (6’5) in combination with his mobility and creativity/puck skill. He made waves at Bruins’ development camp this past summer and he’s carried that over to a promising year in Sweden thus far; suffice to say that Blanar may not fly under the radar much longer. There’s definitely a need for him to continue to improve his reads at both ends and to improve his overall defensive effectiveness, however, a lot of that has to do with his wiry frame and lack of experience at higher levels. Once he fills out, he could eventually become a standout at both ends and is flashing some considerable offensive upside in the U20 league.
Blanar showing off his silky mitts as he works in from the point and eventually scores on the backhand.
Blanar showing off his ability to have a positive impact on the transition game because of his skating ability and puck control.
From the recent Nations tournament, Blanar gives a glimpse of how disruptive his reach and mobility can be from a defensive perspective. When he’s aggressive, he can really make an impact.
Plays like this have certainly been the one black spot on his season thus far. Too many neutral zone and offensive zone turnovers from head down drives into traffic. It’s clear that he has the skill to be a difference maker from an offensive perspective, but Blanar will need to learn to pick his spots better and exhibit better overall vision with the puck to advance at higher levels and make the most of his skill level. Even with his progress this year, he remains a work in progress. But, that is also why it was very encouraging to see him commit to UMass recently, a program with a recent history of developing NHL defenders.
The Toronto Maple Leafs going way off the board (well, not our board) and drafting Tinus Luc Koblar at 64th overall as aged like wine - so far, at least. He looked like he’d be a long-term project when he was picked, but he’s already made the jump to the SHL full time and is playing meaningful minutes. He’s making his presence felt physically and plays with an edge. He’s getting involved in all three zones. He’s reading the game and managing the puck with the type of poise you don’t normally see from an SHL rookie. Sure, the production is limited at the moment, but, like last year, I’m expecting a jump in the 2nd half.
Koblar’s greatest strengths are his physical skills, his compete level, and his hockey sense. His ability to insulate the puck from defenders using his frame is very advanced and he can make that next play from the boards as well. I wish he’d direct some of those passes from the boards towards the slot more like he did in juniors. Koblar has also improved his skating enough to keep up at the SHL level, but still gets caught on his edges every so often and could use more quickness. Right now, Koblar projects to be a bottom 6 two-way center (more a 3rd liner than 4th) who can play in any situation. If he keeps improving like he already has been, I’d say it’s more than likely that he makes the jump to the AHL next year if not the year after. - Robbins
Here we see Koblar (#4 White) winning board battles down low and expertly using his frame to shield the puck from defenders. He’s able to make the next play and make himself a passing option again. Runs out of room near the blueline, but is still able to get the puck to a teammate who keeps possession alive.
Koblar (#4 white) pushing the pace with the puck on his stick despite the lack of straight-line speed to burn. He uses his smarts and hands to attack the heels of the 1st defender to take the middle, looking pass to keep the defender guessing, then fires a shot on the doorstep for a goal.
This next clip is a two-parter, showing off Koblar’s (#4 white) ability to carry and manage the puck. Koblar (#4 white) picks the puck up in the defensive zone and skates it up ice. He gets through two layers of defence, takes the puck behind the Linköping net and is able to direct the puck to a teammate so Leksands can get set up on offence.
Eventually, Koblar (#4 white) gets the puck back and gets to work. He maneuvers around the net while shielding the puck, drawing two defenders towards him before slipping a backhanded pass to a teammate who’s now got tons of time and space to fire a quality shot.
The case of Benjamin Rautiainen is a really interesting one. He went undrafted in his first two years of eligibility, got invited to the Maple Leafs’ development camp last year and finally got drafted in the 2025 Draft by the Tampa Bay Lightning in the 4th round. It is a bit unusual to see a player get drafted quite early in his third year of eligibility. It has to be said that his performance at the last World Junior in Ottawa really helped his case. The fact that he was also able to showcase his offensive upside in the Liiga at 19 years and finish the season with 33 points in 50 games is probably what encouraged the Lightning to take a chance on him.
His skating and his tendency to stay on the outside was something that hurt his draft stock in the past seasons. However, this year, his game has taken another level. So far (at the time of writing), he has one point less than his total from last year only in 25 games. He is on pace for 77 points which would put him in the top 10 of the best season in terms of production for a player in the history of the Liiga. The last 20 year old player that had a 70 point season in the Liiga was Saku Koivu in the 1994-1995 season.
Rautiainen looks more confident with the puck and he is controlling it more. He spends most of his ice time in the offensive zone and his playmaking ability is really his biggest strength. He is still not the most explosive skater but he arrives on time and he likes to slow the game down, especially during zone entries. His agility and his edge work are also an area of his game that he has improved. He is not physical but he has learned to use his body more efficiently to protect the puck. His play away from the puck has also improved. He wins more battles and he is more engaged defensively.
The Tampa Bay Lightning are known to be good at developing players that passed under the radar and it is probably the best case scenario for him. They will take their time with him and eventually bring him over to North America. With the lack of young talent in their prospect pool, Benjamin Rautiainen should have the opportunity to show what he can do in an offensive role with the Lightning.
Rautiainen is primarily known as a playmaker but he can also be a threat with his shot. There is also deception in his offensive game like we can see in this clip where he receives the pass, fakes a shot to freeze the defender and attacks the middle of the ice to get a better shot angle.
His skating has improved from last year. Here, he is able to take his speed through the neutral zone, finds the open space to receive the stretch pass and he is able to keep the separation on the breakaway. Then, finish the play with a nice backhand forehand deke for the goal.
This video is a great example of him entering the zone and slowing the game to attract defenders toward him to open up teammates. It also shows his vision and playmaking abilities as he does a nice backend pass for the assist.
Another clip where he slows the pace down while entering the zone and suddenly speeds up to find an opening and attack the middle of the ice. Good puck protection as well before directing the puck at the front of the net for the assist.
Milton Gästrin has taken a clear and impressive step forward during the 2025–26 season. After a strong year at the junior level, where he produced consistently and showed he was a standout talent, he has now begun to establish himself more firmly within MoDo Hockey’s pro roster, putting up 14 points in 18 games in the Allsvenskan series.
The qualities that defined him in J20, his quick decision-making, confidence with the puck, and ability to create offense are now becoming visible against senior competition as well. His growing ability to contribute on the scoreboard at this higher level is an important sign of his progression.
What truly sets this season apart, however, is not just his offensive output. Gästrin has developed into a more complete, reliable two-way player in my opinion.
He works hard on both sides of the puck, stays involved defensively, and shows a maturity in his positioning that wasn’t as pronounced a year ago. He handles the physicality of the Allsvenskan series very well. He’s also been given more responsibility in a wider range of situations, from forechecking pressure to responsible play in his own zone.
Signing his first NHL contract before the season clearly marked where his trajectory is headed. Now, through his increased responsibility and steady performance in MoDo, Gästrin is showing that he’s not only a promising prospect, he’s a player with the potential to succeed at the highest level in the years ahead.
Gästrin is confident in his puck-carrying at the pro level, protects the puck well, makes a play, and quickly reclaims possession to get a shot on net.
I can’t highlight his offensive impact without acknowledging the scoring itself.
His lethal wrist shot, already a standout asset in last season’s U20 play, has elevated to a level fully comparable with Allsvenskan standards, and in my opinion, even those of the SHL.
Gästrin displays a strong two-way work ethic, driving the play offensively, then quickly shifting gears to track back and support his defenceman when the opposition breaks the other way.
Gästrin has adjusted quickly to pro level physicality, showing he can handle bigger and stronger opponents than those he faced in U20 last season.
]]>
1. New York Islanders - Matthew Schaefer - Defense
Even though this year doesn’t have the allure of the first pick next year (Gavin McKenna), the Islanders still hit the gold mine by winning the lottery with such low chances. There’s been some chatter about a Hagens selection given his local connection, but you can’t pick first overall based on that. The Islanders just locked up Ilya Sorokin long term as one of the better netminders in the NHL, so it truly makes sense to jump at the chance to draft Schaefer, a potential franchise defender who can play in all situations and eventually serve as the team’s captain.
2. San Jose Sharks - Michael Misa - CenterWe’ve read some chatter that draft pundits believe Mike Grier could favour selecting someone like Martone or Frondell with this pick, given his desire to add size/tenacity to the lineup moving forward. We’d argue that Misa is just as competitive, but more skilled. This is an extremely well-rounded player who gives the Sharks a ton of flexibility moving forward. He can slot at the wing or move another of their top young forwards to the wing. He also gives them a little more dynamic, play driving ability than they currently have in the system.
3. Chicago Blackhawks - Caleb Desnoyers - CenterIf there has been one modus operandi of the Hawks management in recent years, it’s that they’ve heavily focused on bringing in elite skaters. When we look at the players in this range, Desnoyers is the best skater of the remaining forwards. The Hawks could see Desnoyers filling a Jonathan Toews type role for them in the future, giving them a well-rounded two-way guy and helping to shore up their center depth moving forward.
4. Utah Mammoth - Anton Frondell - CenterSimilar to the Hawks, Utah has also had an modus operandi related to size and physicality. If their picks aren’t big, they need to be competitive. The newly minted Mammoth could go a variety of directions. Porter Martone would provide that size on the wing they’ve been building up. Maybe they’re enticed by Roger McQueen and not scared by the injuries. And while Frondell isn’t huge, he plays a heavy, mature game. They liked a similar player in Cole Beaudoin last year, but Frondell has greater offensive upside. Utah’s interest stems from the hope that Frondell can be their Sasha Barkov or Anze Kopitar.
5. Nashville Predators - James Hagens - CenterThis is a system that needs to add a high-end playmaker and that’s Hagens. Did he have a disappointing second half? Sure. Are there concerns about his size and ability to play center at the NHL level? Probably. But the Predators have trusted their U.S. scouts a lot in recent years and Hagens would really inject skill into a system that needs it.
6. Philadelphia Flyers - Porter Martone - WingOn the one hand, this feels low for Martone, given that NHL teams are going to be drawn to his style of play in hopes that he can be a playoff warrior in the future. But, on the other hand, it’s also possible that teams take a run on the centers available at the top of this draft. That allows Martone to fall into the lap of the Flyers. The perfect complement to Michkov in the future? Maybe there’s hope that Martone could provide what the Flyers thought they’d be getting in Cutter Gauthier prior to the trade demand.
7. Boston Bruins - Brady Martin - CenterAt this point it seems inevitable that Martin goes fairly high, perhaps even higher than this. NHL teams love his work ethic and his potential to be a top shelf NHL playoff performer. Look no further than what Sam Bennett is doing in the NHL playoffs currently. Martin is the kind of all situations impact forward that the Bruins need to kickstart their retool.
8. Seattle Kraken - Radim Mrtka - DefenseIs this the year that the Kraken finally uses a first-round selection on a defender? It has to happen at some point, right? The Kraken opt for Mrtka, a big Czech defender who could develop into a top four defensive anchor. How much offensive upside is there? Can the physical game reach another level? They could go for Jackson Smith here, but it seems more likely that they go for the more polished Mrtka, especially considering he played in Seattle of the WHL this year, so they’d be very familiar with him.
9. Buffalo Sabres - Victor Eklund - WingEklund is the type of player that the organization badly needs to help them take that next step. He’s an absolute warrior on the ice and projects as that strong playoff performer because of his compete level. Yes, he’s not huge and needs to fill out, but he could be the perfect complementary winger in their top six. He already had success as a pro in Sweden this past year and could move through their system quickly, fitting their timeline perfectly.
10. Anaheim Ducks - Jake O’Brien - CenterThe Ducks have some great goal scorers right now, but a top shelf playmaker like O’Brien could really help the organization moving forward. Anaheim has drafted out of the OHL a lot in recent drafts, and they obviously trust that region and their scouts from that region. O’Brien is going to need some time to bulk up and get quicker, but his upside is as high as any pivot in this draft class.
11. Pittsburgh Penguins - Roger McQueen - CenterThe true wild card of the draft because of his health. If McQueen’s back wasn’t an issue, he’s likely a top five pick because of his unique skill set. But, on the heels of Cayden Lindstrom, NHL teams are likely to be pretty skittish. The Penguins are a franchise who can afford to take this home run swing. Their system needs help; they badly need a home run on the heels of the end of the Crosby era. However, the Penguins scouting staff also loves physically assertive and competitive players so don’t rule out someone like Kashawn Aitcheson here.
12. New York Rangers - Jackson Smith - DefenseSmith is unquestionably one of the highest upside players available in the draft this year. He is potentially the complete package on the blueline. However, there are some concerns over his ability to process the game. For that reason, he’s probably a longer-term project who will require patience. For the Rangers, while they could use a center more, it seems unlikely they reach on a player just for the sake of positional or organizational need. Smith gives the Rangers a potential home run and they’ve had some luck with a similar kind of player in K’Andre Miller.
13. Detroit Red Wings - Kashawn Aitcheson - DefenseThe Red Wings have a type. Aitcheson is that type. The organization wants to build a team eventually engineered for the playoffs, so the focus has been on compete level and physicality. There may not be a defender who exemplifies those characteristics more in this draft. But his offensive game is underrated, and it gives him a solid chance of developing into a Kevin Bieksa style two-way type. The Wings traded Andrew Gibson and Brady Cleveland hasn’t developed well since being selected. Aitcheson is better than both.
14. Columbus Blue Jackets - Justin Carbonneau - WingOne of the draft’s most creative and skilled offensive players, Carbonneau has excellent offensive upside. The Jackets have not shied away from the QMJHL in recent years and he would give them another high-quality offensive player on the wing to build around, given that their center depth is fairly solid. Could make a similar impact to Kent Johnson, who is coming off his best NHL season.
15. Vancouver Canucks - Braeden Cootes - CenterSometimes things just work out. The Canucks badly need a young center with upside in their system and Cootes just happens to be one of the best players available. It’s likely that they’d be very familiar with him too, considering he plays with Seattle of the WHL. Cootes is a well-rounded two-way center who projects as an all-situations type.
16. Montreal Canadiens (via Calgary) - Carter Bear - WingWith news that Bear’s achilles injury was only a partial tear and that he’s already back on the ice, his draft stock isn’t likely to take much of a hit. Montreal would see Bear as a strong fit in their organization as a complementary piece. He’s competitive and effective through the middle of the ice and would likely be the perfect fit with guys like Suzuki or Demidov.

With back-to-back picks, the Canadiens take back-to-back WHL players. Yeah, the Canadiens have Reinbacher and Mailloux waiting in the wings as right shot defenders, but the main club badly needs one to pan out. You can never have too many solid defenders who can play the right side in the NHL. Fiddler is a solid two-way presence and gives them a great security blanket.
18. Calgary Flames (via New Jersey) - Jack Nesbitt - CenterThis just feels like a fit. The Flames favored the OHL last year and their picks out of the league all had strong draft plus one years. Additionally, they’ve shown a desire to add size to their forward group. Nesbitt is a big pivot who showed really positive growth this year in Windsor. He is a potential all-situations, middle six center.
19. St. Louis Blues - Lynden Lakovic - WingWhile there are some concerns over Lakovic’s compete level and consistency, he’s still a high upside swing as a big winger with skill. The Blues don’t really have a player like this in their system right now, and at this point of the first round, the risks associated with Lakovic are worth taking.

It just seems inevitable that someone is going to bite on Ravensbergen in the first round. He has all the tools to develop into a topflight netminder. The Jackets are a likely candidate. They need a true incumbent in net. They have multiple first round picks. They’ve drafted a lot out of the WHL. Yes, they took Evan Gardner in the second-round last year, but he’s not the same quality of prospect as Ravensbergen.
21. Ottawa Senators - Jakob Ihs Wozniak - WingOttawa is a team that hasn’t been afraid to go a little off the board in recent years. And they’ve primarily focused on players with unique skill sets or physical tools. Ihs Wozniak saved his draft stock with a strong second half and he has top six upside as a bigger scoring winger. Ottawa has also drafted heavily out of Sweden in recent years.

After selecting Martone earlier, the Flyers go back to the OHL again to take Kitchener’s Cam Reid. Reid is a highly mobile, two-way defender. He’s not big, but he’s very intelligent and projects as a solid second pairing type who could possibly quarterback a powerplay unit in the future.

Earlier the Predators selected James Hagens out of the NCAA, and they returned there with their second pick, opting for Wisconsin defender Logan Hensler. While his offensive production disappointed in his freshman season, his physical tools make him a potential defensive stalwart at the NHL level. It will also be interesting to see how his on puck game develops as he matures. The Preds traded for Andrew Gibson previously, so there’s obviously a desire to add prospects like this to their pipeline.
24. Los Angeles Kings - Sascha Boumedienne - DefenseThere’s definitely a need for the Kings to add a quality defensive prospect to their cupboard and Boumedienne would be a great selection here. He improved drastically in the second half of this year, helping Sweden to a silver medal at the U18’s and Boston University to a second place finish in the NCAA. There’s a need to refine his game and improve his decision making, but the mobility is great, and he has great upside as a top four defender.

After taking Desnoyers with the third overall selection, the Hawks take a similar player in Malcolm Spence, only Spence plays the wing. This gives Chicago another mature two-way player who skates well, who can help insulate some of their younger, higher skilled guys. Spence is leaving the OHL next year to play at Michigan (NCAA), but he could be an NHL’er in only a few years.

The big Czech wing finished the season on a high, with a strong Clark Cup playoff performance for Muskegon. There’s a need to improve his skating, but Nashville hasn’t shied away from players who need to improve pace. With four picks inside the top 35, the Predators can afford to take a few big swings and Nestrasil has solid potential as a top six support player.
27. Washington Capitals - Henry Brzustewicz - DefenseThe Capitals would have seen a lot of Brzustewicz this year while keeping tabs on defensive prospect Cam Allen, and there’s certainly been a previous connection to London with the likes of Connor McMichael and John Carlson. Brzustewicz is a raw, but toolsy two-way defender who is going to get a ton of ice time and development opportunities in London moving forward.
28. Winnipeg Jets - Milton Gastrin - CenterIt seems likely that the Jets could take a center with their first this year, given the need to improve organizational depth. They have lots of options at this point in the draft, but after what happened with Rutger McGroarty, I wonder if they steer clear of an NCAA player. Gastrin is an athletic, two-way center who projects as a middle six type.
29. Carolina Hurricanes - Cullen Potter - Center/WingIt seems like the Hurricanes always take the player who is highest ranked by the amateur scouting organizations left remaining on the board; in this case? Speedy forward Cullen Potter. One of the draft’s best skaters, there are concerns about his NHL effectiveness given his size and somewhat perimeter-oriented game. However, Potter is a player with significant NHL upside.

It’s starting to feel inevitable that West goes in the first round this year after fully committing to hockey. He’s such a tremendous athlete and his upside is quite high, as long as you’re willing to exhibit patience. The Sharks already have a deep system and can afford to play the waiting game here. This is the type of home run swing you take when your system is already loaded.

There’s definitely a chance that Reschny goes much higher than this. He’s one of the draft’s most intelligent pivots. However, he also has the feel of the type of guy who NHL teams are a little wary of, with average size and average athleticism. This would be a coup for the Flames, who solidify their center depth with two great first round selections.

When you’ve got three first round picks, you probably take a big swing with one of them. Horcoff is very raw and underdeveloped physically, but when his frame fills out, he could end up being a quality pro. He had some really great moments in the NCAA as a true freshman in the second half.

GM Mike Grier has a type and that’s Zonnon. He loves forwards who bring consistent energy and physicality. Zonnon is one of the draft’s best forecheckers and he’s a capable offensive player too.

It seems likely that an NHL team jumps at Wang early, even if we have him ranked a little lower. The Hawks are probably a great fit. They have the depth to take a big swing like this that requires patience. They also put more emphasis on skating ability than pretty much any other organization at the draft.

Last year, the Preds opted to take Russian Yegor Surin with their first-round selection and that looks like a tremendous pick. So why not go back and select mobile defender Limatov, who possesses significant upside as a two-way rock?

With a few high-end offensive defenders in the system, including taking Cam Reid earlier in this draft, they take big, stay at home defender Rombach out of the USHL. He could really help to be a calming presence on the blueline in the coming years.

The second goaltender off the board can often be a bit off the board and the Caps continue that trend by taking Pradel, a big netminder with a ton of potential as he gets stronger and improves technically. He gives them a future netminder to build around, a weakness in the system.

The son of former NHL’er Marcus, Eric is a potential middle six, two-way center who gives the Kraken another pivot to pencil into their lineup in the future. They haven’t drafted a ton out of Sweden, but he checks a lot of the boxes that they typically value.

This is a franchise that needs to turn things around and become harder to play against. Vansaghi projects as a fierce competitor who can be tough to play against and who can provide a ton of versatility to the Sabres’ coaching staff in a few years. The Sabres would be very familiar with Vansaghi after watching Maxim Strbak this year.

There’s definitely a chance that this big, budding power forward goes earlier than this. However, he’d look great in the Philadelphia organization as a crease crasher, powerplay triggerman, and overall physical nuisance.

The Canadiens have gotten some good players out of the NTDP in recent drafts. It’s strange to think that it’s possible (like forecasted in this mock) that none could be selected in the first round. Moore is a rangy pivot who has the tools but just needs to get stronger to become more consistent. Montreal can take a swing here in hopes that he puts things together to reach his upside.

A bit of a drop for Kindel due to concerns over his frame and skating ability, but he’s a top tier playmaker and a potential all situations pivot. With Eiserman in the system, it would make sense to target a high-end playmaker to help get him the puck in the future. Insert Kindel.

The Rangers have loved the NTDP in recent years and after taking Jackson Smith in round one, they opt for a bit safer prospect in round two. McKinney is one of the draft’s best defensive centers and he improved a ton offensively over the course of the season. He is a great fit in the Rangers’ system.

Detroit hasn’t drafted a ton out of Russia lately, at least not like in the glory days, however this seems like the kind of player that they should be targeting here, especially if they go “safer” again with their first-round pick. Zharovsky is a skilled and creative playmaker who has terrific offensive upside. Gives them a player that they don’t have a ton of in the system currently.

A late bloomer physically, Lee is an intelligent and well-rounded offensive player who just needs to get stronger and quicker. There’s a bit of a similar profile to Alex Bump here, when the Flyers took him and that’s worked out pretty well for them so far. Why not go back and try to strike gold twice?

At some point, someone is going to pull the trigger on Ryabkin early, even if his year was pretty disjointed. The offensive upside is simply too tantalizing to pass up and the Utah franchise has been all about swinging for the fences on Russian players in recent years. This feels like a fit.

It definitely seems likely that the Canucks could look to bring in a goaltender with one of their early round picks this year, given the lack of a clear-cut top prospect in the pool. It seems pretty clear that the Canucks are size queens at the position and that screams Frolov, a big, athletic type that is likely one of the first off the board for the position.

When you have THIS many selections, you’re going to come to a point where the risk is worth the reward on a player. Schmidt isn’t perfect as a smaller winger, but he has among the highest goal scoring upside of any forward available this year.

Back-to-back NTDP selections for the Canadiens in this mock. This is a bit of a fall for Murtagh, but his poor U18’s might have left a sour taste in the mouth of some chiefs of staff. He’s got the potential to be a solid complementary piece and that could fit in really well in the Canadiens system down the line.
50. New Jersey Devils - Matthew Gard - CenterA big pivot with good two-way upside and enticing physical tools. The Devils need to upgrade the center depth in their organization and Gard would be considered one of the better pivots still left on the board.

Given his lack of size, it does seem likely that other goaltenders go before Ivankovic, even if it’s debatable whether he’s the most talented netminder in the class. The Bruins badly need goaltending in the system with the two Providence standouts (Dipietro and Bussi) set to be UFA’s. The Bruins have had good luck historically with smaller netminders like Tim Thomas, Byron Dafoe, and Andy Moog, so this…kind of makes sense.
52. Minnesota Wild - Petteri Rimpinen - GoaltenderWith the Wild’s first pick of the draft (after dealing their first), they take a goaltender who had a heck of a season in Rimpinen. He was the Liiga ROY and the top goaltender at the WJC’s. The reality is that Wallstedt’s development has stagnated and Rimpinen can push him pretty quickly.

The Sharks are loaded. We’ve already said it. But if there is a need in the system currently, it is a potential standout stay at home defender. Amico may just be this draft’s best, but he missed most of the year with a knee injury. San Jose can be patient with him in hopes that he can develop into a potential partner for someone like Luca Cagnoni down the line.

After drafting so many high-end offensive defenders in recent years, you’d think Calgary could look to use one of their high end picks this year on a physical, stay at home type to pair with them down the line. We’re a bit lower on Bedkowski than the rest of the industry, but we expect him to be drafted this high. Calgary has also loved the OHL in recent years.

Another goaltender taken early because it’s a strong goalie draft. The Predators go with another Russian, who could end up being the best goalie in this class. With so many picks in a strong goalie year, we’d be shocked if the Predators don’t use one on a goalie to groom behind Saros.
56. Tampa Bay Lightning (via Los Angeles) - Adam Benak - CenterWhen you don’t have a ton in your system and your best prospect (Issac Howard) sounds like he’s spurning you, you’ve got to shoot for the stars. There’s obviously a chance that he’s a faller even further than this because of his size, but you get to a point where the risk is worth it. Benak could certainly end up being a great player for the Lightning.

The Kraken have loved them some OHL since joining the league and even though they took a similar player in Nathan Villeneuve last year, you can’t have too many of these types of players come playoff time. Czata is a staunch competitor and two-way forward who projects as a possible elite third line player down the road.
58. Vegas Golden Knights - Max Psenicka - DefenseThe Golden Knights haven’t taken a defender in the first two rounds since Daniil Chayka and that isn’t working out. So, with their first pick in the draft, they go to the WHL to select Import defenseman Max Psenicka. He’s got some really intriguing tools, but he’s still learning to use them to develop an identity.

Kevan is a well-rounded offensive player with a chance of developing into a middle six piece in the future. He would instantly become one of the higher upside forward prospects in the system, even if there’s a need for him to get quicker and refine his critical thinking skills on the ice.

The Ducks have really loved drafting out of Sweden in recent years and here they take Genborg, one of the draft’s most physical forwards. The offensive upside may be a bit limited, but he’s the kind of player who fits in the system well because he projects as a solid complementary piece to the other talented players they have. He’d be a potential playoff warrior for them when the time comes.

Prep kid from Rhode Island who is heading to Providence. Outstanding upside as a two-way defender and one of the better skaters in the draft. He’s a long-term project who needs time to improve his decision making, but he’s a somewhat local kid they would likely be very familiar with.

Coming into the season Trethewey was seen as a contender for the top defender selected along with Schaefer. Not the case anymore after a poor year with the NTDP. However, he still has great upside as a two-way defender with good mobility. The Hawks can take that chance that he gets back on track.
63. Toronto Maple Leafs (via Florida) - Alexei Medvedev - GoaltenderThe Leafs haven’t used a pick in the first three rounds on a goalie since 2016 (when they took Joseph Woll), so they’re due. They’d be very familiar with Medvedev and his development from scouting Easton Cowan this year. His timeline also perfectly lines up with when the pro system will need a new injection of youth. He has the upside to be an NHL netminder and is one of our top goalies available this year.

Stockselius is a player flying under the radar a bit right now who could go higher than the pre-draft consensus says. He’s a high IQ type who could potentially be a very versatile player for the Devils down the line. As his frame fills out, it will be interesting to see how the offensive side of things becomes more consistent for him.
]]>You can read about our final first round rankings in this free article
Subscribers can download the magazine here.
If you are not a subscriber and interested in learning more, you can learn more here.
Subscribers will receive access for three months and will include all of our other NHL draft coverage as well preparation for the upcoming season. If you choose not to subscribe and wish for a direct download, that will be available next week.
Check out our in-depth profile of #1 ranked Matthew Schaefer as an example of our coverage.
]]>
Position: RW, Shoots: L
H/W: 6-foot-1, 165 pounds
Date of Birth: 2007-04-10
Alexander Zharovsky has quickly become one of the most intriguing players in the 2025 draft class. Early this season, Alex showed bright flashes of elite hands and high end processing but just couldn’t seem to find the back of the net with any of his choices. After only six points in his first 16 games in the MHL, the dam finally exploded and Zharovsky flooded the league with 44 points in the remaining 29 games. He quickly became one of the most confident players in all of junior hockey and appears to have the potential for many more levels in his development.
Elite puck handling is the focal point of his game. Very few players at any level of hockey are able to pull off the moves that Alex can while making it look so effortless. No matter the situation, 1v1, 1v2, or, even 1v3, Zharovsky has fully escaped with two or three quick moves and has likely set up a dangerous look through his passing.
He is very effective off the rush. He pushes the pace with the puck, beats opponents 1v1, and finds teammates with timely, play-sustaining passes. His skating form and pace will need to be improved to keep this up at higher levels, but he has proven that he can dominate junior competition when given the runway to do so.
Zharovsky has proven himself to be quite the playmaker this season. He truly is a pass first player that enjoys setting up his teammates in clever ways. Each game he seems to find a new way to create chances with a creative blend of fakes to draw opponents to him before firing a perfect no-look pass onto the tape of a cutting teammate.
Despite his immense offensive talent and playmaking abilities, Zharovsky lags behind other top picks in skating and shooting. His skating is quick enough to beat defenders and circle the zone at the MHL level, but improvements will need to be made to his straight-line stride and agility to continue to mimic this production at higher levels. On the shooting front, Alex can pick corners well in tight but anything from distance quickly turns into a weak, wobbly puck that gives goalies little trouble.
Zharovsky’s dominance this season has been impressive to say the least. The most exciting element to his projection is the fact that it still looks like he has many more levels to his game that he can reach. He has been able to stuff the stat sheet with highlight reel passing plays and elite dekes while still looking raw. If all goes well, Alex could easily become a smart and dangerous top six playmaker who makes difficult plays look effortless against the world's best defenders.
Skating is not necessarily a strength of Zharovsky but he moves more than well enough to succeed at the MHL level. When given enough runway in transition, he can pick up enough pace to push play up ice and force opponents to turn to keep up. I would not describe him as a very agile skater, but he is able to pull off quick directional cuts to explode into space and escape pressure combining his hands with well-timed accelerations.
His stride is a bit awkward, moving up ice with notably short strides and far too many crossovers. This gives him just enough speed and control to beat opponents wide but not enough to create real separation against top defenders. He seems to like to move on his inside edges in an A-frame stance after a few strides. When he has the speed, this can be quite effective at the MHL level but it is not likely to work as well once he starts playing against men next season at the VHL or KHL levels.
Skating needs to be a major point of emphasis this offseason. Alex is likely going to be given a great opportunity to play in the KHL to start next season. In its current state, his skating will not be good enough to replicate the success he has had this year at the pro level. I’d like to see him improve his form, explosiveness, and agility to be able to create real separation against defenders. This will be a necessary step to be able to execute many of the moves he has dominated with this season.
Good pace and quick decisions allow Alexander to transition play into the offensive zone. Has enough pace to make a board play around a forward in overtime but this pace will be difficult to use at higher levels.
Good showcase of Zharovsky’s transition talents. He can push up ice with good pace and easily handles the puck through hordes of the defenders with a purpose. Easily makes his way towards the net. Skating is a bit short and choppy.
Decent pace, showing off the ability to work the puck deep into the offensive zone using his feed and some deceptive fakes to pass opponents.
This is the average Zharovsky pace off the rush against one of the MHL’s best defenders, Vadim Lukin. He attempts to push wide but does not have enough speed and gets closed off with physical play after being angled to the wall.
Grade: 50
Zharovsky’s shot is below average but was good enough to find the back of the net 24 times this season. He has a great touch in tight to the goal, able to quickly reposition the puck and pick small targets and finish his chances. He scored a majority of his goals in tight to the net.
His shots from distance are a very different story. While he possesses a quick release, he is not able to get much power from outside and often misses the net entirely. He will need to learn to use his elite hands to become more deceptive with his looks. He currently telegraphs his shots a bit too much, making goalies' lives far too easy. He has more than enough talent to pull off fake shots, drag releases, and quick repositions but rarely takes advantage of the tools he possesses in shooting situations.
His first instinct is to pass when in the offensive zone but will let shots go when he feels there are no open teammates. This leads to a lot of forced shots from a distance. His shot choices have not been the best, firing into crowds and from poor angles resulting in low danger attempts, easily stopped by the netminder.
As a skilled playmaker, a high-end shot is not a necessity, but I would like to see improvements to this area of his game. At the very least, I’d like to see him selecting better moments to shoot and hit his targets more often.
Attempted move is a bit forced but he recovers by finding the rebound and firing a laser into the top corner.
Shot power and placement need to be a point of emphasis this summer. Good work getting to a spot but not many goalies are going to let that squeak by.
Most of Zharovsky’s goals this season came in tight to the net. He does a great job finishing looks in the crease.
Grade: 45
Zharovsky’s hands may be the best in the entire 2025 draft class. Very few players can navigate themselves out of the most difficult situations as gracefully as Alex can. He makes every deke look easy and executes each play in the most nonchalant way possible.
Every stickhandle seems perfectly mapped out, moving at the right time to avoid checks and slip through multiple opponents into space to make a play. He is very precise with his moves, allowing him to maintain full control no matter how close or far away he holds the puck from his body, creating an infinite number of options for escapes, passes, and shots.
One of Zharovsky’s biggest positives is his ability to use his elite hands to set up chances on offense. He plans his plays ahead of time, pulling off precise moves that allow him to drag opponents one way before sliding pucks against the grain, right onto the stick of a cutting teammate.
The hands and quick processing abilities that Zharovsky possesses are top of the line even with some rough spots that show up from time to time. The elite talent that shines every single game despite still looking like a young, raw prospect with room to grow, makes me think that we could have a budding superstar on our hands. Alex’s confidence has grown steadily all season and was consistently able to impress me every game that I watched. I can only imagine the moves he will be able to pull off next season.
Elite handling and control around multiple defenders directly leading to a dangerous shot off the bar.
Receives pass on the zone entry and proceeds to embarrass the defender with one quick move, opening a lane to the net.
Very shifty and deceptive. He makes moves with the puck before fully showing his next move. He keeps his head and body moving in the initial direction, deceiving defenders before cutting towards the puck and wide of his man.
Zharovsky sneaks in the background of the play, becoming a perfect back door option when his
teammate could slide him the puck. Without hesitation he jumps into the slot, dangles an opponent with a smooth move to the backhand and snipes, top corner from one knee.
Sometimes you just have to do it all yourself. Zharovsky makes this goal look much easier than it should be.
Skilled drag move and cut to the cage off the rush.
Grade: 62.5
Over the course of this season, Zharovsky has proven himself to be a highly intelligent player. He processes the game very quickly, allowing himself more than enough time to create chances, get to spots, and even shut down plays in his own end.
Alex consistently executes on difficult passing plays that directly lead to high danger looks. He has the ice mapped out perfectly in his head and uses a smooth combination of elite handling and deceptive look offs to hide his motives and hit targets with remarkable accuracy. He is an elusive player that uses his talents to open up space for every one of his teammates and reads developing plays well, allowing him to set up dangerous looks nearly every time he steps on the ice.
His off-puck play has also been very impressive this year. He reads the ice well, allowing him to see opportunities before they fully develop. He times his cuts into space at the perfect time, becoming a target just as teammates have the ability to move the puck. He sees developing opportunities moments before they fully form, allowing him to cut to spots where he can be the best available option
On the defensive side of the puck, he completes consistent scans and works to position himself in areas where he can prevent scoring chances. He positions himself well to shut down lanes and break up passes with his stick. He can cheat for offense at times but if a turnover does occur, he is always in a ready position to quickly transition into the offensive zone.
Love the battle for possession on the rebound and just ridiculous vision to set up his teammate with what was essentially a spinning no-look pass, directly on the tape. Gross.
Head up reading options, quickly repositions the puck to take advantage of open triangle on the defenseman and hits his teammate with a perfectly timed pass to spring a breakaway chance.
Kucherov-esque shot pass here to create a goal. Already knew where he was going to pass the puck next allowing for no hesitation to create a great look.
Doesn’t get a full look here but I think this is a good example of Zharovsky’s ability to quickly spot and exploit defensive lapses. The second defender begins cutting too strong towards the middle and rather than wait for him to get there, Alex makes an early cut in the opposite direction, opening up a much larger lane and look.
Grade: 60
Zharovsky is not too physical but his effort and compete levels have definitely grown over the course of this season. He has created some nice clips without the puck, hunting opponents down and getting involved in dirty areas. He should not be considered a game changer without the puck. He is not a player that you can describe as a dog along the boards, but he does his part on the defensive end to help attempt to shut down plays.
As a player who will likely get his first taste of professional hockey next season, it is abundantly clear that he will need to add strength and some more grit to his game to be able to replicate the growth from this season. He has shown that he can play through some contact, able to skate through checks and push play into the offensive zone, but heavier hits and larger players seem to be an obstacle for Alex.
Good hustle and a little physicality to create separation leads to
Strong forecheck forces a turnover and continued effort allows for teammates to set up and Alex nearly creates a chance with skilled handy work and a well-timed pass.
Grade: 50
OFP: 53.5
A note on the 20-80 scale used above. We look at five attributes (skating, shooting, puck skills, hockey IQ and physicality) for skaters and six for goalies (athleticism/quickness, compete/temperament, vision/play reading, technique/style, rebound control and puck handling). Each individual attribute is graded along the 20-80 scales, which includes half-grades. The idea is that a projection of 50 in a given attribute meant that our observer believed that the player could get to roughly NHL average at that attribute at maturity.
]]>
Erie Otters defender Matthew Schaefer remains on top, despite not playing since our last release due to a collarbone injury suffered at the World Juniors. However, we have no doubt that Schaefer will return stronger than ever. He has been skating recently and is gearing up for a return for the OHL playoffs. At this point, Schaefer is our clear number one and we don’t expect that to change.
The other players in our top ten are all the same, with some minor shuffling. Michael Misa moves ahead of James Hagens based on his strong production with Saginaw, mixed with Hagen’s drop in production with Boston College post World Juniors. We feel that both players have similar projections as top six pivots, but we feel Misa’s frame gives him a greater opportunity to be a more complete pro. Caleb Desnoyers is the other big riser. While, admittedly, we do have some minimal concerns about his offensive upside, we appreciate his pro style of play and safe floor, in combination with the improvement he has shown offensively over the course of this season. Roger McQueen is the big “faller” inside our top ten due to injury and durability concerns. He has recently returned to action and we’re eager to see how he performs down the stretch.
Among the biggest risers, Bill Zonnon, Cole McKinney, and Jake O’Brien standout. O’Brien is knocking on the door of the top ten, moving from 23 to 13 thanks to his elite playmaking ability and three zone awareness. McKinney elevated his play in the second half to become the top pivot on the US NTDP, giving our scouts a better indication of his offensive upside. Zonnon is an energetic forward with a pro frame who has been a favourite of our Eastern scouts thanks to consistent production.
Among the biggest fallers are Malcolm Spence (from 13 to 23, switching with O’Brien), Luca Romano (24 to 44), Ivan Ryabkin (26 to 39), and Tomas Pobezal (from 39 to 81).
You may have caught our recent, and annual second chances series that outlined the top “re-entries” available for 2025. Kristian Epperson (49), Francesco Dell’Elce (82), Petteri Rimpinen (84), and Sam Laurila (98) cracked our Top 100. Additionally, Jamiro Reber is listed as an honorable mention.
Overall, the picture is becoming more and more clear regarding this draft class. Simply put, the majority of our scouts are not enamored with the depth of this group. “In a normal year, when we put together our March list, the debate for the first round is often charged, with the regional scouts all fighting to have their personal, regional favourites included in the top 32,” said Director of Scouting Brock Otten. “But this year, the debate was more about who actually deserved to be ranked in the first round…there was significantly less table pounding.”
“The way I see it” continues Otten, “there is a clear drop off after about the 20th position. There are unquestionably some solid players available outside this range, but few high upside players. Potential role players are the name of the game this year. As a staff, we’re really hoping some players step up in their respective league playoffs and at the U18’s to help give this draft class a little more excitement.”
You can expect our final draft ranking to be released in late May, coinciding with the release of our annual draft guide.
| RANK | PLAYER | POS | TEAM | HT/WT | DOB | GP | G | A | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Matthew Schaefer | D | Erie (OHL) | 6-2/180 | 5-Sep-07 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 22 |
| 2 | Michael Misa | C | Saginaw (OHL) | 6-1/185 | 16-Feb-07 | 62 | 59 | 67 | 126 |
| 3 | James Hagens | C | Boston College (NCAA) | 5-10/175 | 3-Nov-06 | 35 | 10 | 25 | 35 |
| 4 | Porter Martone | RW | Brampton (OHL) | 6-3/205 | 26-Oct-06 | 54 | 32 | 60 | 92 |
| 5 | Jackson Smith | D | Tri-City (WHL) | 6-3/195 | 13-May-07 | 65 | 7 | 41 | 48 |
| 6 | Caleb Desnoyers | C | Moncton (QMJHL) | 6-2/180 | 11-Apr-07 | 56 | 35 | 49 | 84 |
| 7 | Victor Eklund | LW | Djurgardens (HockeyAllsvenskan) | 5-11/160 | 3-Oct-06 | 42 | 19 | 12 | 31 |
| 8 | Anton Frondell | C | Djurgardens (HockeyAllsvenskan) | 6-1/195 | 7-May-07 | 29 | 11 | 14 | 25 |
| 9 | Roger McQueen | C | Brandon (WHL) | 6-5/195 | 2-Oct-06 | 14 | 9 | 9 | 18 |
| 10 | Lynden Lakovic | LW | Moose Jaw (WHL) | 6-4/190 | 12-Dec-06 | 45 | 24 | 31 | 55 |
| 11 | Radim Mrtka | D | Seattle (WHL) | 6-6/205 | 9-Jun-07 | 41 | 3 | 31 | 34 |
| 12 | Brady Martin | C | Soo Greyhounds (OHL) | 6-0/175 | 16-Mar-07 | 55 | 30 | 37 | 67 |
| 13 | Jake O'Brien | C | Brantford (OHL) | 6-2/170 | 16-Jun-07 | 64 | 32 | 64 | 96 |
| 14 | Cullen Potter | C | Arizona State (NCAA) | 5-10/170 | 10-Jan-07 | 34 | 13 | 9 | 22 |
| 15 | Justin Carbonneau | RW | Blainville-Boisbriand (QMJHL) | 6-1/190 | 25-Nov-06 | 61 | 46 | 43 | 89 |
| 16 | Kashawn Aitcheson | D | Barrie (OHL) | 6-1/195 | 21-Sep-06 | 63 | 25 | 33 | 58 |
| 17 | Cameron Reid | D | Kitchener (OHL) | 6-0/190 | 8-Apr-07 | 66 | 14 | 39 | 53 |
| 18 | Ben Kindel | C | Calgary (WHL) | 5-10/175 | 19-Apr-07 | 62 | 34 | 64 | 98 |
| 19 | Braeden Cootes | C | Seattle (WHL) | 5-11/180 | 9-Feb-07 | 58 | 25 | 36 | 61 |
| 20 | Carter Bear | LW | Everett (WHL) | 6-0/180 | 4-Nov-06 | 56 | 40 | 42 | 82 |
| 21 | Jack Murtagh | LW | USN U18 (USDP) | 6-1/200 | 22-Aug-07 | 42 | 20 | 24 | 44 |
| 22 | Cameron Schmidt | RW | Vancouver (WHL) | 5-7/160 | 19-Jan-07 | 59 | 39 | 37 | 76 |
| 23 | Malcolm Spence | LW | Erie (OHL) | 6-1/200 | 22-Sep-06 | 62 | 32 | 38 | 70 |
| 24 | Joshua Ravensbergen | G | Prince George (WHL) | 6-5/190 | 27-Nov-06 | 50 | 33 | 12 | 2.93 |
| 25 | Jack Nesbitt | C | Windsor (OHL) | 6-4/185 | 12-Jan-07 | 63 | 24 | 39 | 63 |
| 26 | Cole McKinney | C | USN U18 (USDP) | 6-0/200 | 16-Mar-07 | 45 | 21 | 29 | 50 |
| 27 | Eric Nilson | C | Djurgardens (Swe J20) | 5-11/155 | 11-May-07 | 37 | 12 | 26 | 38 |
| 28 | Logan Hensler | D | Wisconsin (NCAA) | 6-2/190 | 14-Oct-06 | 32 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
| 29 | Henry Brzustewicz | D | London (OHL) | 6-2/200 | 9-Feb-07 | 65 | 10 | 29 | 39 |
| 30 | Blake Fiddler | D | Edmonton (WHL) | 6-4/210 | 9-Jul-07 | 62 | 9 | 22 | 31 |
| 31 | Shane Vansaghi | RW | Michigan State (NCAA) | 6-2/210 | 11-Oct-06 | 35 | 6 | 10 | 16 |
| 32 | Bill Zonnon | C | Rouyn Noranda (QMJHL) | 6-1/185 | 3-Oct-06 | 62 | 28 | 53 | 81 |
| 33 | Jakob Ihs Wozniak | RW | Lulea (Swe J20) | 6-2/185 | 1-Feb-07 | 40 | 23 | 34 | 57 |
| 34 | Nathan Behm | RW | Kamloops (WHL) | 6-1/190 | 18-Apr-07 | 57 | 31 | 35 | 66 |
| 35 | Adam Benak | C | Youngstown (USHL) | 5-7/160 | 10-Apr-07 | 53 | 16 | 38 | 54 |
| 36 | Kurban Limatov | D | MHK Dynamo Moskva (MHL) | 6-3/195 | 20-Mar-07 | 45 | 8 | 15 | 23 |
| 37 | Carter Amico | D | USN U18 (USDP) | 6-5/225 | 15-Mar-07 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 38 | Cole Reschny | C | Victoria (WHL) | 5-10/180 | 6-Apr-07 | 60 | 23 | 63 | 86 |
| 39 | Ivan Ryabkin | C | Muskegon (USHL) | 6-0/195 | 25-Apr-07 | 18 | 11 | 8 | 19 |
| 40 | Milton Gastrin | C | MoDo Hockey (Swe J20) | 6-1/185 | 2-Jun-07 | 40 | 18 | 24 | 42 |
| 41 | Will Moore | C | USN U18 (USDP) | 6-2/175 | 24-Mar-07 | 49 | 21 | 22 | 43 |
| 42 | Sascha Boumedienne | D | Boston University (NCAA) | 6-1/175 | 17-Jan-07 | 35 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| 43 | Conrad Fondrk | C | USN U18 (USDP) | 6-0/190 | 1-Jun-07 | 40 | 13 | 14 | 27 |
| 44 | Luca Romano | C | Kitchener (OHL) | 5-11/175 | 25-Jun-07 | 65 | 25 | 26 | 51 |
| 45 | Alexander Zharovsky | RW | Tolpar Ufa (MHL) | 6-1/165 | 22-Feb-07 | 45 | 24 | 26 | 50 |
| 46 | Max Psenicka | D | Portland (WHL) | 6-4/175 | 18-Jan-07 | 22 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| 47 | Jack Ivankovic | G | Brampton (OHL) | 5-11/180 | 22-May-07 | 41 | 23 | 12 | 3.13 |
| 48 | Maxim Agafonov | D | Tolpar Ufa (MHL) | 6-2/195 | 10-Apr-07 | 33 | 6 | 7 | 13 |
| 49 | Kristian Epperson | LW | Saginaw (OHL) | 5-11/180 | 7-May-06 | 55 | 26 | 51 | 77 |
| 50 | Vaclav Nestrasil | RW | Muskegon (USHL) | 6-5/185 | 6-Apr-07 | 51 | 14 | 19 | 33 |
| 51 | Jimmy Lombardi | C | Flint (OHL) | 6-0/180 | 16-Feb-07 | 61 | 13 | 28 | 41 |
| 52 | Gustav Hillstrom | C | Brynas (Swe J20) | 6-1/175 | 20-Jan-07 | 43 | 16 | 22 | 38 |
| 53 | Pyotr Andreyanov | G | Krasnaya Armiya Moskva (MHL) | 6-0/205 | 22-Jan-07 | 37 | 23 | 6 | 1.75 |
| 54 | Arvid Drott | RW | Djurgardens (Swe J20) | 6-0/180 | 11-Aug-07 | 40 | 18 | 18 | 36 |
| 55 | Matthew Gard | C | Red Deer (WHL) | 6-5/190 | 7-Apr-07 | 63 | 18 | 17 | 35 |
| 56 | Ethan Czata | C | Niagara (OHL) | 6-1/175 | 29-May-07 | 65 | 20 | 33 | 53 |
| 57 | Hayden Paupanekis | C | Spokane-Kelowna (WHL) | 6-4/195 | 4-Feb-07 | 68 | 22 | 19 | 41 |
| 58 | Charlie Trethewey | D | USN U18 (USDP) | 6-1/200 | 2-Aug-07 | 51 | 6 | 12 | 18 |
| 59 | Aleksei Medvedev | G | London (OHL) | 6-2/180 | 10-Sep-07 | 33 | 22 | 7 | 2.72 |
| 60 | Daniil Prokhorov | RW | MHK Dynamo St. Petersburg (MHL) | 6-5/210 | 27-Apr-07 | 41 | 19 | 7 | 26 |
| 61 | William Horcoff | C | Michigan (NCAA) | 6-5/190 | 23-Jan-07 | 18 | 4 | 6 | 10 |
| 62 | Tyler Hopkins | C | Kingston (OHL) | 6-1/180 | 23-Jan-07 | 64 | 19 | 31 | 50 |
| 63 | Lasse Boelius | D | Assat (Fin-U20) | 6-0/180 | 16-Mar-07 | 34 | 4 | 14 | 18 |
| 64 | Eddie Genborg | RW | Linkopings (SHL) | 6-1/180 | 20-Apr-07 | 28 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 65 | Semyon Frolov | G | MHK Krylia Sovetov (MHL) | 6-3/200 | 17-Jan-07 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2.75 |
| 66 | Ben Kevan | RW | Des Moines (USHL) | 6-0/180 | 3-Jan-07 | 46 | 12 | 29 | 41 |
| 67 | Peyton Kettles | D | Swift Current (WHL) | 6-5/195 | 1-Sep-07 | 51 | 5 | 9 | 14 |
| 68 | Zeb Lindgren | D | Skelleftea (Swe J20) | 6-1/195 | 14-Apr-07 | 38 | 4 | 15 | 19 |
| 69 | Everett Baldwin | D | St. George's School (USHS-RI) | 5-11/175 | 15-Jan-07 | 22 | 10 | 10 | 20 |
| 70 | Ryker Lee | RW | Madison (USHL) | 5-11/180 | 8-Nov-06 | 48 | 27 | 33 | 60 |
| 71 | Michal Svrcek | LW | Brynas (Swe J20) | 5-10/175 | 26-Jan-07 | 30 | 14 | 16 | 30 |
| 72 | Zachary Morin | LW | Saint John (QMJHL) | 6-1/185 | 25-Jan-07 | 54 | 16 | 20 | 36 |
| 73 | Jacob Rombach | D | Lincoln (USHL) | 6-6/200 | 1-Apr-07 | 50 | 3 | 15 | 18 |
| 74 | Alex Huang | D | Chicoutimi (QMJHL) | 6-0/170 | 30-Jul-07 | 62 | 6 | 33 | 39 |
| 75 | Tommy Lafreniere | C | Kamloops (WHL) | 5-11/170 | 16-Jan-07 | 66 | 24 | 32 | 56 |
| 76 | Haoxi (Simon) Wang | D | Oshawa (OHL) | 6-6/210 | 27-Jul-07 | 29 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 77 | William Belle | RW | USN U18 (USDP) | 6-3/220 | 14-Jan-07 | 50 | 4 | 11 | 15 |
| 78 | Jan Chovan | RW | Tappara (Fin-U20) | 6-3/185 | 9-Jan-07 | 39 | 11 | 12 | 23 |
| 79 | Luka Radivojevic | D | Muskegon (USHL) | 5-9/165 | 3-Jan-07 | 28 | 1 | 16 | 17 |
| 80 | Shamar Moses | RW | North Bay (OHL) | 6-1/200 | 6-May-07 | 58 | 12 | 35 | 47 |
| 81 | Tomas Pobezal | C | HK Nitra (Svk) | 5-10/180 | 18-Sep-06 | 42 | 15 | 8 | 23 |
| 82 | Francesco Dell'Elce | D | Massachusetts (NCAA) | 6-0/170 | 23-Jun-05 | 38 | 6 | 16 | 22 |
| 83 | Vojtech Cihar | LW | Karlovy Vary (Czechia) | 6-0/175 | 29-Mar-07 | 43 | 4 | 5 | 9 |
| 84 | Petteri Rimpinen | G | Kiekko-Espoo (Fin) | 6-0/175 | 25-Apr-06 | 40 | 16 | 9 | 2.36 |
| 85 | Carlos Handel | D | Halifax (QMJHL) | 6-0/170 | 31-Mar-07 | 50 | 3 | 23 | 26 |
| 86 | Burke Hood | G | Vancouver (WHL) | 6-3/195 | 30-Apr-07 | 41 | 18 | 13 | 3.21 |
| 87 | Melvin Novotny | LW | Leksands (Swe J20) | 6-1/185 | 3-Apr-07 | 41 | 12 | 26 | 38 |
| 88 | Sean Barnhill | D | Dubuque (USHL) | 6-5/205 | 8-Jan-07 | 46 | 4 | 4 | 8 |
| 89 | Tomas Poletin | LW | Pelicans (Fin-U20) | 6-1/200 | 30-Apr-07 | 25 | 13 | 7 | 20 |
| 90 | Roman Bausov | D | MHK Dynamo St. Petersburg (MHL) | 6-5/180 | 28-Apr-07 | 39 | 2 | 9 | 11 |
| 91 | Mason Moe | C | Madison (USHL) | 6-1/185 | 26-Mar-07 | 41 | 13 | 24 | 37 |
| 92 | Reese Hamilton | D | Calgary-Regina (WHL) | 6-0/170 | 26-Mar-07 | 59 | 4 | 10 | 14 |
| 93 | Dakoda Rheaume-Mullen | D | Michigan (NCAA) | 6-0/180 | 18-Dec-06 | 35 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 94 | Nathan Quinn | C | Quebec (QMJHL) | 5-11/170 | 29-Aug-07 | 52 | 17 | 29 | 46 |
| 95 | Samuel Meloche | G | Rouyn Noranda (QMJHL) | 6-2/190 | 22-Jul-07 | 49 | 29 | 13 | 2.96 |
| 96 | Maceo Phillips | D | USN U18 (USDP) | 6-6/225 | 25-Feb-07 | 47 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 97 | Eduard Bondar | D | Val d'Or (QMJHL) | 6-5/195 | 31-Jan-07 | 52 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| 98 | Sam Laurila | D | Fargo (USHL) | 6-1/185 | 2-Sep-06 | 50 | 7 | 28 | 35 |
| 99 | Owen Conrad | D | Charlottetown (QMJHL) | 6-2/210 | 10-Mar-07 | 62 | 7 | 19 | 26 |
| 100 | Malte Vass | D | Farjestads (Swe J20) | 6-2/185 | 28-Mar-07 | 40 | 2 | 9 | 11 |
| HM | Karl Annborn | D | HV 71 (Swe J20) | 6-1/185 | 6-Mar-07 | 39 | 3 | 21 | 24 |
| HM | Lucas Beckman | G | Baie-Comeau (QMJHL) | 6-1/180 | 23-Aug-07 | 51 | 30 | 18 | 2.68 |
| HM | Carson Cameron | D | Peterborough (OHL) | 6-1/190 | 27-Jun-07 | 60 | 7 | 16 | 23 |
| HM | Hayden Harsanyi | C | Medicine Hat-Saskatoon (WHL) | 5-10/175 | 10-Jan-07 | 34 | 11 | 12 | 23 |
| HM | Dmitri Isayev | LW | Avto Yekaterinburg (MHL) | 5-9/150 | 26-Jun-07 | 43 | 22 | 23 | 45 |
| HM | Atte Joki | C | Lukko (Fin-U20) | 6-1/190 | 21-Jul-07 | 40 | 15 | 17 | 32 |
| HM | Viktor Klingsell | RW | Skelleftea (Swe J20) | 5-10/185 | 10-Feb-07 | 43 | 17 | 22 | 39 |
| HM | Nathan Lecompte | C | Chicoutimi (QMJHL) | 5-10/165 | 19-Jan-07 | 56 | 14 | 35 | 49 |
| HM | Jeremy Loranger | C | Sherwood Park (BCHL) | 5-9/160 | 15-Jun-07 | 50 | 37 | 57 | 94 |
| HM | Jamiro Reber | C | HV 71 (SHL) | 5-10/170 | 4-Sep-06 | 47 | 8 | 7 | 15 |
| HM | Grayden Robertson-Palmer | C | Phillips Academy (USHS-MA) | 5-11/195 | 29-Aug-07 | 30 | 16 | 23 | 39 |
| HM | David Rozsival | RW | Bili Tygri Liberec (Czechia U20) | 6-0/185 | 1-Jun-07 | 30 | 17 | 20 | 37 |
| HM | Lukas Sawchyn | LW | Edmonton (WHL) | 5-10/175 | 27-Feb-07 | 64 | 15 | 38 | 53 |
| HM | Theo Stockselius | C | Djurgardens (Swe J20) | 6-2/180 | 24-Jul-07 | 40 | 22 | 29 | 51 |
| HM | Mason West | RW | Edina (USHS-MN) | 6-5/205 | 3-Aug-07 | 31 | 27 | 22 | 49 |
| HM | Max Westergard | RW | Frolunda (Swe J20) | 5-11/160 | 3-Sep-07 | 41 | 19 | 31 | 50 |