[16-Apr-2026 04:15:58 UTC] PHP Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Class 'WP_Widget' not found in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/widgets/mckeens_news_feed_widget.php:3
Stack trace:
#0 {main}
thrown in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/widgets/mckeens_news_feed_widget.php on line 3
[16-Apr-2026 04:16:00 UTC] PHP Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Class 'WP_Widget' not found in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/widgets/mckeens_sidebar_menu_widget.php:3
Stack trace:
#0 {main}
thrown in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/widgets/mckeens_sidebar_menu_widget.php on line 3
[16-Apr-2026 04:15:54 UTC] PHP Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to undefined function add_action() in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/shortcodes/mckeens_display_editorials.php:22
Stack trace:
#0 {main}
thrown in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/shortcodes/mckeens_display_editorials.php on line 22
[16-Apr-2026 04:15:55 UTC] PHP Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to undefined function add_action() in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/shortcodes/mckeens_display_tabs.php:50
Stack trace:
#0 {main}
thrown in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/shortcodes/mckeens_display_tabs.php on line 50
[16-Apr-2026 04:15:57 UTC] PHP Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to undefined function add_action() in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/shortcodes/mckeens_heading.php:15
Stack trace:
#0 {main}
thrown in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/shortcodes/mckeens_heading.php on line 15
The 2015 draft has already been a tremendously successful draft for Toronto, as the team selected current superstar Mitch Marner with the fourth overall choice. While that selection could be excused as the aforementioned Hunter had also come from the storied London Knights’ organization in the OHL, second rounder Travis Dermott has also been very impressive, racking up his 100th NHL game late last season. The Leafs also still have high hopes for the second second rounder of that haul, Jeremy Bracco.
None of the players selected by Dubas and company in 2018 have yet to appear in the NHL and the same is obviously true for the recent 2019 haul. We have three draft classes – two of which were wholly under his philosophy for player acquisition and the third one a joint function – to understand the Dubas MO and make judgments about it.
The first thing I think about when looking at those three draft classes is the complete absence of size concerns with the players picked. In the 2015 draft, working in tandem with Hunter, Toronto blended big and small players. Marner, Dermott, and Bracco are all smaller than the average NHLer, but later picks Andrew Nielsen, Stephen Desrochers, and Nikita Korostelev are all built large. Neither of the last two draft classes, led by a singular Dubas, had that characteristic. Of the eight skaters the Maple Leafs drafted in 2018, only one stands taller than 6-0”, the 6-1” fifth rounder Filip Kral.
2019 featured more of the same. Six players were drafted. Three stand 5-11” ad the other three all stand 5-9”. Five of the six are also on the slight side. Of course every player they drafted had supporters both inside and outside of the organization, but Toronto ensured that this wave would not bring size or strength to the NHL team. That said, the team has not been completely size averse in their prospect acquisition. Shortly before the 2018 draft, Toronto gave an ELC to undrafted winger Mason Marchment, a 6-4” crasher who plays a game based on strength. This offseason, they signed Ilya Mikheyev from the KHL, whose frame is above league average in the current climate.
Mikheyev is not alone among Toronto’s top 20 who has above average size, with Lamoriello acquisitions Eemeli Rasanen and Yegor Korshkov more known for their impressive figures than they skill components of their games. But even with Rasanen’s gigantic 6-7”, 209lbs frame, the pipeline for the Leafs is full of smaller players. As more of them graduate to the NHL, we will learn a valuable lesson about how well a team can do when it skews so drastically to smaller players. Further, we will see if the team brings in (or calls up) lesser, bigger players, just for the sack of adding a different dimension. It will be fascinating to watch, even if former GM Brian Burke is rolling in his comically loose tie as he watches it.
-Ryan Wagman

1 Rasmus Sandin, D (29th overall, 2018. Last Year: 3) Sandin is a versatile defenseman capable of leading rushes and quarterbacking them as well. He is a skilled player with a good shot and great hockey sense. He sees the plays before they happen and stays one step ahead and remains focused while doing so. Last year with the Marlies was an adjustment year after he came from Sault Ste. Marie, and as the season went on, he managed to become more comfortable with the pace of the play. His only downfall, which he will hopefully grow out of, is not knowing when to let go of the puck as he tends to hold onto it for too long. With more maturity and experience he will become smarter with how and when he carries the puck to avoid giving up too many turnovers. Sandin has the potential to lead as a top pairing blueliner with the Maple Leafs at his peak. - SC
2 Nick Robertson, LW (53rd overall, 2019. Last Year: IE) What Robertson lacks in size, he makes up for in skill. One of the youngest 2019 draft eligible players, he is one of the most creative players in the OHL. He uses great edgework and quick hands to open up space to operate; ripping off his powerful wrist shot, or a cross ice pass to an open teammate. His puck control draws defenses in to him, which opens up those lanes and space for his linemates. He is also very tenacious on the puck in the offensive end and is terrific at forcing turnovers with his quick feet and stick. Far from a finished product, he needs to mature physically to help him gain an extra step in his stride and to make him stronger playing through checks. The Leafs can afford to be patient with Robertson in hopes that he hits the growth spurt that his brother Jason did (a top Dallas prospect). The upside here is incredibly high, with Robertson possessing the skill set to be a front line player. - BO
3 Jeremy Bracco, C/RW (61st overall, 2015. Last Year: 11) Bracco is a creative playmaker to say the least and every play holds different possibilities thanks to his level of hockey sense. He is a powerful and agile skater that can easily maneuver around opponents with his edgework, often opting to use his inside edges for turns rather than traditional crossovers. There is nothing bad to be said about his level of skill, but without the puck he will need to be more present in keeping pressure on opponents in the defensive zone. Physicality is another weak point to his game and he will have to start to play more physically next season if he wants to prove he is ready for a more intense level. Bracco has the potential to be a top six forward with Toronto and his game is certainly NHL ready. Due to the Maple Leafs’ offensive strength he may have to settle for a lower spot until he gradually works his way up. - SC
4 Ilya Mikheyev, RW (Undrafted Free Agent, signed May 6, 2019. Last Year: IE) A smooth-skating forward with a good knack for the net, Mikheyev is coming off a stellar season in the KHL, even if the campaign was ruined right at the climax as he picked up an injury during the playoffs. He still managed to earn a nod as a All-Star. The Leafs signed a forward who always plays hard no matter what, and can even be useful on the penalty killing, although in the NHL he won’t go that far on will alone. In Russia, he also scored plenty of clutch goals and showcased himself as a very talented player with great hands and an excellent shot. Mikheyev can play on any line and show great energy, will, and technique. The Leafs may have found a diamond in the rough here, and he can become a very valuable player should he manage to adapt fast to his new reality. - ASR
5 Trevor Moore, LW (Undrafted Free Agent, signed Jul. 26, 2016. Last Year: Not ranked) Moore is a sparkplug of a player and he brings 100% effort every time his feet touch the ice. He never quits on a play and his angling on the forecheck is superb. His shot is nothing spectacular and his hands are alright, but he can move and he is lightning quick which makes up for his average puck skills. The major reason why he has been successful is his natural skill combined with his work ethic, as they balance each other out and make him a persistent threat capable of forcing turnovers and capitalizing on them. Moore had the opportunity to finish the season up with the Maple Leafs last year and will be starting this season up with them as well. He is a good bottom six forward at the NHL level, capable of playing on the penalty kill especially well. He will need to keep improving the speed at which he moves the puck to see his game reach new heights. - SC
6 Timothy Liljegren, D (17th overall, 2017. Last Year: 1) When Liljegren is at his best he can be a great playmaker and a strong passer capable of making crisp, tape-to-tape passes. On the contrary, when he is not on his game, he stands still, fails to play the body, makes bad passes, and causes turnovers. He can be terribly inconsistent from one shift to the next which he will needs to improve upon if he wants to succeed at the next level. He will also have to aim for higher offensive production and more shots in the coming year, as he has paled in comparison to Sandin, whose shots per game nearly double that of Liljegren’s. Hope is not lost for Liljegren, however, as he still has potential and has managed to do well with the Marlies as a top four defenseman. With a more consistent season and an improvement in physical play, he could start as a bottom four defenseman and work his way up in the NHL. - SC
7 Joseph Woll, G (62nd overall, 2016. Last Year: 12) A large netminder with remarkable athleticism, Woll proved last season that he can also be a workhorse in the sense that he can withstand seeing a lot of rubber on any given night and still keep his team in the game. The USNTDP grad spent three years at Boston College, consistently chipping away at his save percentage, raising it each year, from a starting place of .913 to .915 and finishing off at .919. There were collegiate goalies with better numbers, but few who played as much, or against as strong a set of opponents. Woll’s technical game is also a strength, in part assisted by his ability to read the flow of the game and anticipate puck movement. The Leafs will give him time to grow accustomed to the pro schedule in the AHL, in hopes that he could be a starting option once Frederick Andersen’s contract expires after the 2020-21 season. - RW
8 Mac Hollowell, D (118th overall, 2018. Last Year: 19) A true testament to Hollowell’s maturity is how well he handled playing in the AHL playoffs after his OHL season finished. The leading defenseman scorer in the OHL last year, he is more than an undersized offensive defender. He has the ability to play in any situation, with his lack of size at 5-9”, really the only strike against him. He is a great skater. He is aggressive and tenacious in the defensive end, willing to block shots or take a hit to make a play. He quarterbacks the powerplay well and is extremely aggressive in jumping up in the play at 5 on 5. It comes down to how effective Hollowell will be at the pro level, and how well he can defend with his diminutive stature. The Toronto Maple Leafs are very high on him and feel that he can be an NHL defender for them down the road. The best case scenario likely sees him as a Jared Spurgeon type. - BO
9 Yegor Korshkov, RW (31st overall, 2016. Last Year: 5) A talented but fragile player, Korshkov had to pass through uncountable injuries over the last three seasons that have prevented him from showing his full potential. With a fresh start in Toronto, he may finally get the chance to play a full season as a healthy player and show all his potential. He has an NHL body with smooth skating ability and soft hands. However, he may lack the consistency and the conditioning necessary to play at a high level. Considering his age, this is nothing that can’t be resolved with some good coaching – something that he will certainly receive within the Maple Leafs system. In the KHL, Korshkov showed glimpses of elite playing, but he needs to be more consistent. - ASR
10 Eemeli Rasanen, D (59th overall, 2017. Last Year: 8) Räsänen's past season was hampered by an injury, limiting him to only 23 games. After spending the end of the season with the Marlies, he now returns to Jokerit in an attempt to have a bigger role in the KHL. He is a massive right-shot defenseman with strong physical tools and decent puck moving abilities. He can find his teammates with simple and accurate passes. He has a hard shot. The main issue continues to be his skating. His stride is fairly powerful but he lacks in mobility and backwards skating ability. He also has work to do on his play reading and positioning without the puck, particularly in his own end. Räsänen is a long-term project whose overall game and especially skating require quite a bit of refinement. - MB
11 Semyon Der-Arguchintsev, C (76th overall, 2018. Last Year: 16) If there is one prospect who has frustrated Toronto Maple Leaf fans, it is Der-Arguchintsev, affectionately called SDA. He opened eyes at last year’s training camp, earning a long look and a contract thanks to his creativity as a playmaker. Unfortunately, his OHL season was a major disappointment as other areas of his game failed to progress. While his hands are terrific, he remains a perimeter player who lacks the strength to fight through checks or create chances consistently below the hash marks. His shot also remains very weak, which affects his effectiveness as a playmaker. It is too early to give up on SDA as a potential top six forward down the line, especially given his physical immaturity, but the coming OHL season will be a big one for his development as definitive NHL prospect. - BO
12 Mikko Kokkonen, D (84th overall, 2019. Last Year: IE) Kokkonen is a stable, physically mature two-way defenseman. He can start the attack with accurate long-range passes which is an asset for his team's transition game. He has a solid shot and is adept at getting his shots through bodies and on to the net. He most often prefers to make the safe play instead of taking risks. On the downside, he lacks explosiveness and has less than stellar lateral agility. He can also struggle on the breakout due to not processing the game quickly enough. Kokkonen has proved himself against high end competition for several years. He had a respectable season in the Liiga as a 17-year-old and will look to build on that in the upcoming season. That said, he does not truly excel in any areas of the game which may ultimately limit his NHL potential. - MB
13 Michael Koster, D (146th overall, 2019. Last Year: IE) For both of the last two seasons, Koster has split his time between his hometown Chaska High – captaining the squad both years – and with the USHL’s Tri-City Storm. While he was an offensive force from the blueline back home, with the Storm he played a more conservative, defense-first game. That being the case, he was still able to demonstrate his high end speed and flash puck skills occasionally, pushing opponents back on their heels as he rushed the offensive zone. His draft stock was helped by his USHL work, as he proved that he could hold his own and even succeed against the more uniformly bigger and more talented level of opponent he faced in that league. Koster is expected to spend all of next season in the USHL before joining the Minnesota Golden Gophers in 2020-21. He is a long-term project, but has top four upside. - RW
14 Dmytro Timashov, LW (125th overall, 2015. Last Year: 10) Timashov is a fun player whose feet never stop moving. He can play a physical game and is dynamic enough to play well on both powerplay and penalty kill. He is much weaker in the defensive zone than the offensive zone and will need to work on his defensive positioning, especially when on penalty kill as his movement seems unsure and his timing is sometimes off. Notwithstanding, he is a smart player and has enough natural skill to be considered for a bottom six roll in the future. His development in the AHL with the Marlies has been good and his last year had over 40 points, which could cause him to be a front-runner for a call-up to the NHL if he can repeat that production. Playing another year as a top forward will give him the responsibility and confidence to be able to try skating at the NHL level. - SC
15 Teemu Kivihalme, D (140th overall, 2013 [Nashville]. Last Year: Not ranked [Not Affiliated]) The former Predators’ draft pick joined the Toronto organization after two impressive seasons with Karpat in the Liiga. Kivihalme is a high-end skater with terrific two-way mobility He gets around the ice effortlessly and has very good speed. He can carry the puck up the ice and controls the puck well at high speeds, yet he is more effective when delivering the puck quickly to the forwards. In order to become an everyday NHL defenseman, he needs to gain toughness, strength, and to round out his defensive game. His positioning and decision making in the offensive zone can be somewhat questionable at times, but with small refinements, those shortcomings can be fixed. Kivihalme’s development is trending upwards and he will challenge for a roster spot on the Leafs’ defense sooner than later. - MB
16 Ian Scott, G (110th overall, 2017. Last Year: Not ranked) Scott is a polarizing goalie as he has all the physical traits, and has met all of the statistical targets that you look for in a prospect goalie. Height (6-3”), GAA (1.93) and SV% (.932) are all fantastic and yet often he leaves you wanting just a bit more. He uses his body well and is effective at getting in front of the first shot however he can be challenged when forced to move cross ice. He makes some excellent saves off the rush and has impressive agility that enables him to make saves he shouldn’t get to. On the other hand, he does seem to let in a few that he probably shouldn’t. If he can avoid the soft goals he could project as a NHL backup after some experience in the minors. - VG
17 Pontus Holmberg, LW/C (156th overall, 2018. Last Year: Not ranked) Holmberg is a good late round pick as he has bloomed late and a nice set of skills. He has a lot of good traits in his game that could translate well to the NHL, like the way he can cover the puck in the corners and create scoring chances from there. He has strong balance which will get stronger with more overall strength. His production hasn’t taken off yet but should with more strength and poise. He won a roster spot in the SHL last year and had an okay rookie season in a small role. He should be able to earn a bigger role this season and his game should rise accordingly. Holmberg isn’t a sure thing to make the NHL but if he can continue to take steps forward in his development, he could become a creative middle six forward. - JH
18 Jordan Schmaltz, D (25th overall, 2012 [St. Louis]. Last Year: 15 [St. Louis]) The Leafs acquired a reclamation project in Schmaltz in an offseason trade that sent Andreas Borgman to St. Louis, and only time will tell if they win the trade. A first-round pick in 2012, the lanky right-hander has had a rocky developmental path, but can still make a future splash in the NHL as a solid skating, mature two-way defender. An intelligent playmaker, his anticipation on offense is matched only by his smarts on defense, which helps him shut down opposing forwards with tight blueline gaps. Though he is not much of a shooter, his vision and sense in transition allow him to hit friendly open sticks with relative ease. He possesses some intriguing skill, but he simply ran out of time with the Blues; with time, he could be more with Toronto, such as a decent depth blueliner at the NHL level. - TD
19 Adam Brooks, C (92nd overall, 2016. Last Year: 17) Brooks stood out in his major junior years with the Regina Pats in the WHL and has so far had the same growth pattern at the professional level with the Marlies. His rookie year was a decent start and last season saw him double his points total to 40. He is a quick and smooth skater who likes to carry the puck and is confident in his zone entries. He can struggle to hold onto the puck the same way he did in major junior and his play in the neutral zone led to many turnovers this past season. Brooks has a good set of hands but he has less space now and he will have to be more aware while carrying the puck. He will also need to work on moving the puck quicker and being less selfish. He is natural playmaker with the potential to be a second line center if he really pushes himself, but has been building his game to also fit in a bottom six role. - SC
20 Pierre Engvall, LW (188th overall, 2014. Last Year: 14) Engvall is a surprisingly good prospect to be occupying the last spot on this list, however he does not yet play a mature enough game to meet the NHL criteria. He is a strong skater and reads the play well, is a good team player, and can play every forward position well. He does not have a particularly quick or powerful shot but it is at least accurate. He will need to up his intensity and work on gaining momentum in the physical side game before getting to the next level, taking better advantage of his plus size. With a more high pressure attitude, he could end up being listed as valuable special teams contributor and an everyday bottom six forward in the future. Engvall will have to make sure that he starts the season working hard and carries that work ethic through the whole season. - SC
]]>As is the case with many old pros, Bergman moved into coaching, spending six seasons behind the bench in his native land, mostly in lower leagues, but also one season in the SHL with Skelleftea. He spent a few years out of the public eye before emerging in 1993 as a scout for the Anaheim Ducks with whom he worked for five seasons.
The Mighty Ducks drafted six players out of Sweden in those five years, two of whom (Johan Davidsson and Michael Holmqvist) played in the NHL for a combined 239 games. After that, Bergman disappeared again, emerging as a Swedish scout for Toronto in 2005 and he has been in the Maple Leafs’ employ ever since. From his inauspicious beginnings as a scout for Anaheim, Bergman is now widely recognized as a super scout.
In his first draft with Toronto, the Leafs used a sixth-round pick on a big winger named Viktor Stalberg. In his second draft, a seventh-round pick was used on Carl Gunnarsson. Toronto did not select a player out of Sweden over the next two years, and their three Swedish selections from 2010 did not have the success experienced by Stalberg or Gunnarsson, nor did their Swedish pick from 2011.
In fairness to Bergman, picks from the range of the draft where his recommendations were being selected were not often successful, and the success of those first two had earned him a long leash. The Maple Leafs have selected at least one prospect from the Sweden in each draft since 2010 and without fail, they have exceeded expectations, even the ones who did not go on to NHL fame.
Between the reins of John Ferguson Jr., Cliff Fletcher, Brian Burke, Dave Nonis, Lou Lamoriello and now Kyle Dubas, Bergman has been a constant. The Maple Leafs’ system is now chock full of Swedish prospects, and many, if not all of them, have Bergman’s fingerprints all over them.
Although we lack proof, it is hard to imagine that the two Swedish first rounders picked by Toronto in recent years who were already playing in the OHL in their draft year, were not selected without Bergman’s input and blessing. So, as we look at a Toronto system whose top four players were born, raised and schooled in Sweden, in addition to another two from the top ten and a seventh in the next group of ten, we know where the credit lies. We can also look at how pivotal those Swedish players were in the Calder Cup championship run by the Maple Leafs’ AHL affiliate, the Toronto Marlies.
Tommie Bergman will turn 71 years young shortly before the next WJC in Vancouver but is still going strong. As new GM Dubas, himself with a scouting background, grows accustomed to his present role, he can rest assured that he has an asset in Bergman that most other teams would kill for.

1 Timothy Liljegren, D (17th overall, 2017 Last Year: 1st) As the only 18-year-old defenseman to play regularly in the AHL last year, the bumps were expected and Liljegren experienced his share. But he also had his moments of magic. He regularly demonstrated high end puck carrying skills and the mobility that had him seen at one time as one of the top prospects eligible for the 2017 draft. He is a fantastic passer and has nice whip on his wrist shot from the point, all indicative of a strong top four blueliner, with top pairing potential. He could occasionally show his youth and inexperience when defending against first rate talent, although his instincts are in the right places. He will provide tight coverage but can sometimes fail to finish a check or close strongly enough. He has even shown the occasional willingness to use his still developing body. The things he lacks are coachable. The things he has are less so.
2 Andreas Johnsson, LW (202nd overall, 2013. Last Year: 11th) Andreas Johnsson was impressive in his first full campaign in North America. He was fantastic in his second season. Not only did he produce at a point per game clip in the AHL, during the regular season, and at 1.5 points per in a AHL postseason run that ended in a title and the Jack A. Butterfield Trophy as playoffs MVP, but he also brought his highly skilled, and gritty game to the NHL scoring three times in 15 combined regular season and playoff games for the Leafs. Johnsson has all of the tools needed to be a high-end top nine winger with top six upside. His IQ shows on both sides of the puck and seems to have a magnetic attraction to getting the biscuit on his stick. His time is now.
3 Rasmus Sandin, D (29th overall, 2018. Last Year: IE) In addition to his years under the watchful gaze of Thommie Bergman, Sandin spent much of his draft year in Sault Ste. Marie of the OHL, where Toronto GM Kyle Dubas took his first steps as a hockey executive and still has deep connections. So it is fair to say that the Maple Leafs knew what they were getting when Sandin was available to them in the first round. The most impressive facet of his game is his highly advanced hockey brain, but his skating ability and puck skills also both grade out as above average. Undersized, but not without a physical element to his game, he is a prototypical modern age defenseman, one who can gain control of the puck and make the right plays in getting it into a favorable position.
4 Carl Grundstrom, RW (57th overall, 2016. Last Year: 4th) For the second year in a row, Grundstrom finished his Swedish season and then came to Canada to get his feet wet in the AHL. This time, with their lengthy playoff run, he got enough ice time to prove that he belonged, scoring eight goals during the postseason campaign. A rugged power winger, Grundstrom has a very good motor, and excellent hands. His first few steps are above average, and he can gain separation. Once he gets the puck, he moves it along quickly but with purpose. His strength is also evident in his ability to maneuver with the puck under heavy coverage without coughing it up. He will likely spend the majority of 2018-19 in the AHL before taking the next step.

5 Yegor Korshkov, RW (31st overall, 2016. Last Year: 15th) Drafted by Toronto in his third year of eligibility, Korshkov has since improved his offensive output year over year in the KHL, finishing last year fifth among all skaters aged 22 and under. Although a physically imposing specimen, his game is centered more around a high-end hockey IQ and impressive offensive skills. He sees the game very well and is able to create chances for himself, or his linemates. He also moves very well for his size, suggesting an ability to hold up in the fast-paced style of play Toronto prefers. The main question with Korshkov is when he will come over. Toronto is interested, but he is expected to play at least one more season in Yaroslavl.
6 Garret Sparks, G (190th overall, 2011. Last Year: unranked) After appearing in 17 NHL games in the Maple Leafs’ lost season of 2015-16, it was largely expected that Sparks would have graduated from this list long ago. Instead, the rebuilding Maple Leafs sent him back to the AHL and his 1.79 GAA and .936 save percentage both led the league last year, earning him a well deserved Baz Bastien Memorial Award as the top netminder in the circuit. A highly athletic goalie who skates very well for his position, he plays an aggressive game, and is calm under pressure, trusting in his quick legs to get him out of jams. He has also improved upon his propensity to let one bad goal snowball. He has a good chance of stealing the backup job in the NHL this season.
7 Calle Rosen, D (UDFA: May 16, 2017. Last Year: 10th) One of two undrafted free agent defenders signed out of Sweden in the 2017-18 offseason, Rosen started slower than Andreas Borgman, but was more integral to the AHL Marlies in the second half, exhibiting a real dynamic element from the blueline. A high-end skater with very impressive puck skills, he excels when he dips into the offensive end as a trailer on the rush. He is very poised on the puck and has a strong enough shot that his goal scoring rate should with more North American experience. Ostensibly an offensive defenseman, he is competent off the puck, although his slight frame will necessitate that he be protected to an extent.
8 Eemeli Rasanen, D (59th overall, 2017. Last Year: 16th) A gigantic defender with intriguing natural gifts, Rasanen is a big presence from the point, although his production in his first post draft year was a mild disappointment. He skated very well for his size and has a killer point shot, although his wrist shot can also get through the crowd and on net. A bit of a gentle giant the 6-7” Finnish blueliner was fine in Kingston of the OHL, but often left you wanting to see more. Like many players of his stature, it looks like slow development is the best course and he has returned to Finland to spend 2018-19 with Jokerit, competing against KHL competition. The step up in competition might be the challenge he needs.
9 Sean Durzi, D (52nd overall, 2018. Last Year: IE) Although he spent some time on the sidelines last year due to an ankle injury, Durzi’s production when he was healthy was top notch, with his 1.23 points per game rate placing him second among all OHL defensemen and earning him a call in the second round in his second year of draft eligibility. Like most of the defensemen above him on this list, Durzi has above average mobility and puck skills while lacking somewhat in the size department. The right-handed shot grades out as above average in most of his core attributes, outside of physicality. His vision is advanced although he needs to time his pinches better. His tracking ability suggests that he has value off the puck as well.
10 Dmytro Timashov, LW (125th overall, 2015. Last Year: 18th) After struggling at times in his first year as a pro, Timashov began to right the ship in his follow up campaign, flashing dynamic playmaking abilities in both the regular season and the postseason for the Marlies. Still inconsistent, the core elements of above average skating – with edgework that help that attribute play up – and very impressive puck skills suggesting that his sneaky skill set will allow him to continue to improve. Short but stocky, he has strength although he rarely initiates physical play. There is a boom or bust quality to Timashov’s overall game, but his ability to generate offense will ensure that he gets as many chances as he needs to end up on the right side of that coin flip.
11 Jeremy Bracco, C/RW (61st overall, 2015. Last Year: 5th) In a lot of ways, Jeremy Bracco has a lot in common with the player immediately above him on this list. Slightly better wheels perhaps, slightly less dynamic as a play maker. Where Bracco still has ground to make up is in his ability to not be an anchor away from the puck. For that reason, he often found himself on the press-box last season, especially in the postseason, appearing in only four games. As with Timashov last year, it is far too early to condemn Bracco as a bust after only one year in the AHL, especially when we see that his scoring numbers were actually pretty good. More will be expected of him is his follow-up, but he has the good to deliver.
12 Joseph Woll, G (62nd overall, 2016. Last Year: 8th) A highly athletic netminder, Woll had some ups and downs in his sophomore season at Boston College, as well as his second stint with Team USA at the WJC, although for both teams, he consistently kept his squad in the game. A pure butterfly goalie, he enjoys handling the puck and can help kickstart the transition. He can struggle seeing the puck cleanly and is known to whiff with his glove, but he has some elements of a promising netminder and the Maple Leafs, who have enough at the pro level to staff their NHL, AHL, and ECHL squads, will let him take his time on campus.
13 Josh Leivo, RW (86th overall, 2011. Last Year: 7th) Josh Leivo shouldn’t be on this list. After putting up 10 point in 13 NHL games in 2016-17, he was expected to make the NHL roster out of camp. And he did. But then he spent nearly the entire season in the press box, dressing only 16 times, a victim of head coach Mike Babcock’s preference for veteran grinders on the fourth line. In fairness to Babcock, Leivo lacks in pace and does not have a reputation as a defensive stalwart, although he knows how to handle himself in his own zone. Leivo plays a strong game, knows how to push possession and has a fantastic shot. With three more games played, he will graduate from this list.
14 Pierre Engvall, LW (188th overall, 2014. Last Year: unranked) A late round find from Sweden in the mold of Victor Stalberg (see above), Engvall performed very well in his first season in the SHL, earning an ELC after the season there ended, and he continued to impressed in a cameo with the Marlies. Engvall has a long, rangy frame, skates quite well and earns accolades for his offensive tool kit. He can get the puck nicely through the neutral zone and shows strength on the puck. He still has to develop his game away from the puck and can come across as a bit soft despite his length, but to his credit, he spent this year adjusting to two new levels of competition. A full, healthy AHL campaign will teach us a lot about what is in his future.
15 Igor Ozhiganov, D (UDFA: May 17, 2018. Last Year: IE) A 25-year-old with six full seasons in the KHL under his belt, Ozhiganov is a prospect in the technical sense of the word, if not in the pure sense. While his final season with CSKA Moscow was a bit of a disappointment, there was great speculation that his diminished role on the club as at least as much a reaction of his coaches to the rampant rumors that would be leaving after the season for North America, as it was about anything to do with his actual level of play. A beefy right-handed shooter, he offers a bit of everything, including fine wheels, solid offensive instincts and skills, and a mature overall game. Ozhiganov could make the Leafs out of camp in a #6/7 D role, or spend some time getting acclimated to the North American game in the AHL first.

16 Semyon Der-Arguchintsev, C (76th overall, 2018. Last Year: IE) A smooth skater with slick skills with the puck, Der-Arguchintsev is so slight that it is a wonder his full last name can fit on the back of his uniform. Notably, if he was born one day later, he would not even have been eligible for the draft until next June. His lack of strength shows up in his shot as much as it does in the parts of the game that are normally attributed to physicality, but he is as projectible as anyone from the 2018 draft class. His hockey smarts currently are more geared towards the offensive side of the puck, but his ability to process the game bodes well to continued development in that area. He is one to watch.
17 Adam Brooks, C (92nd overall, 2016. Last Year: 6th) One the one hand, for a player who led the WHL in assists for two years running, with a combined 169 over 138 games, to put up only 19 points in a roughly full first season in the AHL was a letdown. He still shows a knack for setting up teammates with a clever pass, helping extend possessions and moving the puck in the right direction, but the finishing was lacking. On the other hand, Brooks was pleasantly surprising in both his willingness and his ability to play a two-way game. A slight 5-11”, he plays a cerebral game, and can be suitable for a variety of roles. I expect improved offensive output in his second season with the Marlies, but it is fair to question how much better he can be.
18 Dakota Joshua, C (128th overall, 2014. Last Year: unranked) In a system teeming with speed and skill, it can be easy to overlook Joshua, a beefier power forward playing for a non-powerhouse NCAA program. Although he played a critical role as a junior for the Buckeyes, helping the team to the Frozen Four, he was more of a secondary offensive threat than a primary scorer. A solid two-way player who has decent hands although not a frequent puck player. His utility in his own zone and the penalty kill, as well as his sheer strength when moving the puck, should be enough to convince the Leafs to offer him a contract after completing his collegiate eligibility this season.
19 Mac Hollowell, D (118th overall, 2018. Last Year: IE) A teammate of first rounder Rasmus Sandin’s with Sault Ste. Marie, Hollowell is tiny in a system already loaded with smaller defenders. After being overlooked in his first year of draft eligibility, he more than doubled his offensive output in his second go-round. Despite the gaudy point numbers (56 points in 63 games in the regular season), Hollowell’s tools are only around average. Where he stands out is in his feet as he is an excellent skater as well as his hockey smarts. He plays within his limitations and generally makes the right play. A critical part of one of the best possession team in the CHL, the hope as that he can carry some of that to the pros within two seasons.
20 Fedor Gordeev, D (141st overall, 2017. Last Year: unranked) Still new to the blueline, the gigantic (6-6”, 212) Gordeev can struggle to take care of business in his own end. On the other hand, playing with a moribund Flint squad in the OHL, he nearly doubled his point production, showing more assertiveness with the puck from the blueline. He skates well for his size and has begun to play with the jam expected of a player with his imposing stature. Gordeev still has a way to grow, in his game if not in his frame, but it cannot hurt for an organization so saturated with smaller defenders to have a few bigger men as points of comparison and to offer a different look.
]]>A note on the 20-80 scale used below. We look at five attributes (skating, shooting, puck skills, hockey IQ and physicality) for skaters and six for goalies (athleticism/quickness, compete/temperament, vision/play reading, technique/style, rebound control and puck handling). Each individual attribute is graded along the 20-80 scales, which includes half-grades. The idea is that a projection of 50 in a given attribute meant that our observer believed that the player could get to roughly NHL average at that attribute at maturity.
| Eemeli Rasanen | 2017 Draft (59th - Toronto Maple Leafs) |
|---|---|
| Position: D, Shoots R | H/W: 6'7", 215 lbs |
| Stats to date (GP-G-A-PTS-PIMS) | Kingston Frontenacs, OHL (12-3-8-11-16) |

Skating: His mobility around the ice is incredible for a player of his height. His skating lets him play both decent North-South and East-West games which surprised me last season. This year it is more of the same as Rasanen has good form when he is skating forward and backwards. Backwards is the biggest compliment to his skating. When he is facing gap control pressure his backwards skating helps keep opponents outside the dots and he pushes them to the walls. His long stick obviously helps in this regard, but it is the skating ability to be able stay with the player when they attempt to move around that makes him a reliable defenseman. There is one bad feature about his skating and it has to do with his height. He is slow to react to players away from the puck moving into the high slot area. He cannot move as fast as he should because his lanky legs prevent him. Grade: 55
Shot: One of the few defensemen in the OHL that I have seen that possesses all three major shots that can be taken from the blue line (Slap, wrist and snap). Rasanen is putting up good offensive numbers early in the season and it is thanks in large part to his shot selection, particularly his slap shot. His wind up and hand positioning on the stick enable him to put his body weight into the shot and make it scarier for the goaltender tyring to make the save. Grade: 60
Skills: As a defenseman with a long stick Rasanen does not struggle at all with keeping the puck. He has the capabilities of using his forehand, but also his backhand when he is skating around the net. His passing is top notch as he favors backhand passes to confuse his opponents. The drawback to his puck skills is his lack of mobility with the puck in the offensive zone. When he carries it, he is not skating and is dribbling the puck less, but because of his big size opponents do not dare challenge him unless he is being double teamed. Grade:50
Smarts: A smart and composed player that does not buckle under the pressure too much. Last season Rasanen was a little shaky at times when he was facing faster players and he would misjudge his timing when guarding his own zone and the opponent would be able to skate around. Now Rasanen works better to understand the positioning of his opponent’s skating and looks to see where their eyes are looking. He is hitting less, but that is his choice to put more energy into forcing players into an area on the ice that makes them uncomfortable instead of just going for a hit. He has worked hard to develop his game into a two-way style of play, but he still needs to work on his role as an offensive defenseman. There will be times where he will pinch, but the high-risk play does not end up working and it sends the other team into a 2-on-1 scenario going the wrong way. He needs to communicate more with his forward teammates who will take the defensive spot when he charges to the net. Grade: 55
Physicality: No question about it, Rasanen is a physical specimen. He is hitting less though to play more of a fast style under his new coach. However, he will lay it on his opponents if he is re-directing his opponent to the wall outside the dots when they are attempting an offensive rush. Grade: 50
Summary: Eemeli Rasanen was a gamble at the NHL draft being taken in the second round by the Maple Leafs. The Maple Leafs like their mature players and Rasanen has proven to be just that. His game has matured since his first season in the OHL as he is choosing to make better plays that effect his game in a positive way. It is already paying dividends with his increased production through the first ten games of the young season. He possesses a five-tool skill set with the huge benefit of being the tallest player in the OHL. The biggest challenge to his development entering the pro ranks is his ability to adapt to the faster play. There were times where I thought his reaction time was off in the defensive zone, not because of his mentality, but because of his overall lack of mobility preventing him from accelerating from one spot to another within a few strides. It will be interesting to see how he plays in the AHL once he is of age.
Overall Future Projection (OFP): 54.25
| Noel Hoefenmayer | 2017 Draft (108th - Arizona Coyotes) |
|---|---|
| Position: D, Shoots L | H/W: 6'0", 190 lbs |
| Stats to date (GP-G-A-PTS-PIMS) | Ottawa 67's, OHL (14-1-5-6-10) |

Skate: Hoefenmayer’s skating is the same as it was last season. It is great, but nothing has changed. Hoefenmayer’s acceleration from his own end to the offensive zone is still fun to watch, but because he did not improve on his skating opponents are catching him more so he has had to dump pucks in more rather than carrying the puck into the offensive zone. He may have worked on his skating, but it was noticeably the same speed as it was last season. Grade: 50
Shot: His shot has changed for the better. Hoefenmayer has focused more on his aim and it was evident earlier this season as he was firing the puck at his teammates’ sticks to get the tip in assist. It is a different approach from the usual shot attempts a lot of defenseman in the OHL take. Hoefenmayer still has a powerful slap shot, but he uses it less and puts a lot more focus on involving his teammates in front of the net more than just shooting the puck on net and hoping for a secondary rebound chance. Grade: 55
Skills: He can still protect the puck through his stick handling abilities. The way he can deliver a cross over with the puck is fun to watch and annoying for his opponents. He is using more head fakes to get defenders looking the other way when he brings the puck up ice. His predictable skating hurts his puck possession and he gets caught in a neutral zone trap quite often when he is moving the puck up ice and his puck handling skills cannot help him. Grade: 50
Smarts: He is struggling early in the season, he normally plays with confidence, but for some reason he is second guessing himself. He is not playing the smart way he has shown capable of in the past, and his struggles are most notable in the neutral zone. When he tries to carry the puck in the neutral zone, the neutral zone trap strangles his play and Hoefenmeyer ends up turning the puck over. It is tragic because he plays with such poise in the offensive zone that you would think he never had struggles with the puck. In the defensive zone it is the same story. He is not thinking straight and his defensive positioning is off key as he is not communicating with his teammates about who is covering whom. He needs to regain his overall confidence to step up this season. Grade: 50
Physicality: There was a real physical aspect to Hoefenmeyer’s game this season. He will play in the dirty areas, but he relies on support to help him win the loose battles. He needs to step up his aggressive side this year otherwise he is going to be pushed around to the point that he will eventually hurt himself. Grade: 45
Summary: It is early into the season, but Noel Hoefenmeyer’s struggles have been noticeable. He is not playing on the PK and his PP time was limited. He is not playing with confidence except for in the offensive zone where he thrives. Defensively he needs to put more intensity in driving players out of his zone and he needs to be more aware of where the players away from the puck are. The one noticeable sign of improvement is his offensive ability to create offensive chances. He has put a focus of shooting the puck from the blue line to his teammates’ sticks which is a unique way of driving the puck to the net. Unfortunately, this season if he does not start to hit his stride he may take a step back in his development and he will start to panic about whether he can get an entry level contract with the Arizona Coyotes.
Overall Future Projection (OFP): 50
]]>
Freed from Burke and his pugilistic bent to team building, the Leafs tanked hard and began the rebuild with a hyper-skilled approach to the draft. In three consecutive years, Toronto had a top ten choice and maxed out on each, selecting William Nylander, Mitch Marner, and Auston Matthews in consecutive years.
In the latter two years, the Maple Leafs also had a number of extra picks to play with and it seemed like each and every selection was made with upside in mind. In fairness, the organization left over by Burke was fairly barren, with Connor Brown and Josh Leivo representing the best of a bad lot. Even with the top picks of those two drafts already NHL stars, nine of the 20 players drafted in those two classes are ranked among the current top 20. The talent influx was so great, the Leafs had to literally walk away from three of the players they selected, for sheer lack of available contract space.
Not only did the Leafs run out of contract room. Between the high end players drafted, and a few others signed as free agents from Europe, the team found itself at the draft this year with a loaded talent base, and now actually in need of some of character players. If not exactly hearkening back to the days of “truculence and aggression”, they have now turned their sights on players who, while not lacking in skill, are more fitting to the high-energy, two-way types that new head Coach Mike Babcock likes to use to fill out the bottom end of the NHL roster.
Whereas in the last two years they took hyper-talented players like Dmytro Timashov, Martins Dzierkals, and Adam Brooks with their mid-round picks, all three offensive minded junior hockey producers who made up in points what they lacked in size and strength, this year, those middle round picks were used on Vladislav Kara, Fedor Gordeev, and Ryan McGregor. These three all have in common questions about their offensive skills, and plaudits about their two-way games. They also all have projectable frames, especially the 6-6”, 215 pound Gordeev.
A system can never have enough talent in its ranks, but there is something to be said for having diversity in the types of talents available. The approach to their 2017 draft class is not necessarily a statement about a new direction for their scouting staff, as much as it an admission that they did not have enough of that type of player and that the talented youngsters they already had did not seem like locks that they could remain effective when playing down in the lineup. That said, some of the putatively offensive players in the system have already been accruing experience playing bottom six minutes in the AHL, such as Timashov, and Trevor Moore.

1 Timothy Liljegren – Seen as one of the top draft prospects 12 months ago, Liljegren’s draft year was slowed by being repeatedly shuffled between levels and teams, as well as a bout with mononucleosis. One of the best skaters available in the 2017 draft class, his raw puck skills verge on the elite, although they have not often showed themselves yet in game situations. Can be devastating when he plays the aggressor. Effectiveness in his own zone comes and goes, but flashes enough to expect that part of his game to grow and improve with time and steady development.
![April 6, 2016: Toronto Maple Leafs Right Wing Kasperi Kapanen (37) [9616] in action during the game between the Toronto Maple Leafs game against the Columbus Blue Jackets at Air Canada Centre in Toronto, ON. (Photo by Gerry Angus/Icon Sportswire)](https://www.mckeenshockey.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Kasperi-Kapanen-289x231.jpg)
3 Travis Dermott – Although he missed a stretch of time to injury, when healthy Dermott was showed a dynamic, puck moving modern day game from the blueline in his rookie pro season. Undersized, but he maximizes every inch and pound of his frame, catching opponents off-balance with some explosive hits. Can create danger with the puck on a rush. Very mature defensive game highlighting aggressiveness and positioning. Heads up player who loves to walk the line.


4 Carl Grundstrom – A hard working forward with a strong and diverse collection of offensive tools, Grundstrom’s prospect stock took a big step forward last year between great performances for Sweden at the WJC, for Frolunda in the European champions Hockey League and in a late season cameo with the Marlies in the AHL playoffs. An excellent skater with a high hockey IQ and great hands, he is expected to play in Sweden again this year, but could be in the NHL sooner than later.
5 Jeremy Bracco – Ending his junior career on a high, winning both a WJC gold medal and a Memorial Cup, Bracco’s decision to leave Boston College only five games into his freshman season seems to have paid off. He is a fantastic skater with breathtaking puck skills. Undersized but with a nose for the net, he will sometimes play possum only to strike with deadly force once opposing defenders are occupied with one or other of his linemates. Has near elite hands.
6 Adam Brooks – The two-time defending assist leader in the WHL is finally going to bring his sublime passing skills to the AHL this year. Forced into an overage WHL season due to the Marlies’ numbers crunch last year, Brooks creates plays for linemates more through his high hockey IQ and instincts than through pure puck skills. Although undersized, he is more than functional in his own zone and plays a valuable role in getting the puck back and beginning the transition to an offensive attack.
7 Josh Leivo – Along with Garret Sparks, one of only two prospects left in the system from the Brian Burke era, Leivo plays with some of the jam that characterized that time in Maple Leafs’ history. Hampered by injuries throughout his pro career, he produced very well with the NHL club when healthy last year, but that was rare. A solid skater with energy who loves to crash the net, this year is likely his last chance to break through with Toronto.
8 Joseph Woll – By far the highest upside goalie among all netminders in the system, Woll had a very promising first NCAA season with Boston College. Very strong at blocking the bottom half of the net, thanks to quick legs. Likes to challenge the shooter when the puck is straight ahead, but will play deeper in his crease the closer the puck is to the walls. He reads plays fairly well, but can get in trouble due to sloppy footwork.
9 Andreas Borgman – A dynamic skater with great acceleration who relishes open ice hits, Borgman signed as a free agent this spring after helping to lead HV71 to an SHL title. He plays a two-way game, although his play is stronger in his own end than when supporting the attack. He reads the play well and tends to keep a tight gap. His upside is somewhat limited due to his moderate offensive tools, but between his skating and his off-puck work, he will play in the NHL.
10 Calle Rosen – It is not by design that the two talented Swedish blueliners signed by Toronto this offseason rank one next to the other. Of the two, Rosen is more physically unassuming, but carries a bomb from the point. He is also a powerful skater who demonstrates good puck control and precise passing. He is advanced positionally, but can exhibit a general lack of poise when playing without the puck. Has top four upside, but needs own zone refinement to get there.
11 Andreas Johnsson – A smart, smallish player with great instincts, Johnsson proved last year that his game can translate nicely to North America. While he was not the offensive force that he had been in the SHL, he was still able to flash soft hands and a very hard shot. Has a special talent for getting off clean shots through a maze of legs. Will play in the dirty areas, but avoids getting directly involved in puck scrums. Can get to a second gear with his feet.
12 Frederik Gauthier – Although he has less offensive upside than anyone on this list, excepting (probably) the goalie, Gauthier is almost exactly what Mike Babcock looks for in a fourth line center. Huge, with a gigantic wingspan, he plays a strong possession game and is great defensively, particularly on the penalty kill. Solid skater for his size. Has good faceoff technique. Can be used for tough shifts, leaving the favorable situations for his more talented teammates.
13 Kerby Rychel – An offensive force as a junior, Rychel’s game has slowly been morphing into that of his father Warren’s since turning pro. Of course he will never be a 1980’s style goon, but it is fair to point out that he has gone from a bruising power forward with good discipline to a bruising, undisciplined power forward. To his credit, he is a strong skater and he loves to unleash his powerful shot. Attitude issues helped him get traded from Columbus. Will need to earn his chances with Toronto.
14 Martins Dzierkals – The most effective player on last year’s Latvia entry at the WJC, Dzierkals is an exciting player with great puck skills. Drafted out of Latvia before moving on to Rouyn-Noranda, the Maple Leafs had an extra year before needing to sign him to an ELC, so he will play with the Marlies this year on an AHL-only contract. He is a dynamic offensive threat who grades very well on both his skating and puck skills. Plays with more jam than many players his size.
15 Yegor Korshkov – A big physical winger who’s playing style seems more geared to the North American game than the KHL where he is now entering his fourth season. Korshkov uses a variety of shot types to threaten opposing netminders, although his release could stand to be quicker. Although his shot is the stronger tool, his tendency is to play in a passing role. A 200-foot player, his KHL contract expires after this season.
16 Eemeli Rasanen – As awe-inspiring as Rasanen’s towering 6-7” frame is, he also has game to go along with his length. A very good skater, particularly for his size, can be part of the rush instead of only a trailer. His short area quickness still needs refinement. Better at moving the puck around than teeing one up from the point. Came along defensively in leaps and bounds in his first OHL season. Very comfortable at closing gaps and pushing opponents to the walls. Uses his size, but plays clean.
17 Andrew Nielsen – A big boy with an even bigger shot, Nielsen was the runaway scoring leader among Marlies’ defensemen as an AHL rookie, thanks largely to his cannon. In many cases, the facts embedded in the last sentence would be enough for a top ten or even top five ranking. Nielsen lands here due to his clunky, slow skating. He can get away with it at times in his own zone due to great reach and a willingness to get inside opponents and force them to the outside.
18 Dmytro Timashov – A fantastic scorer in the QMJHL with sublime playmaking skills, Timashov still flashed those elements of his game in his first pro season, but struggled in general at even strength. He was still able to get himself into position to score, but was not able to capitalize nearly as much as he did as a junior. Although short, he is stocky, and his stature should not be what holds him back. Needs to prove he can produce on a depth line before moving up.
19 Miro Aaltonen – A small skill player, Aaltonen had a great season in the KHL before signing as a free agent with Toronto. Never signed by Anaheim, which drafted him in 2013, he developed for a few years in Liiga before his year in Russia. He can be selfish on the puck, has a strong enough shot that his approach often pays off. Will shoot from anywhere. His skating is average at best, which results in him disappearing from the action when the puck is not on his stick.
20 Rinat Valiev – Although his second pro season was beset by injuries, Valiev still has a lot to recommend him as a potential third pairing NHL blueliner. He has a solid frame, coupled with excellent mobility and edge work. He makes smart plays in all zones and helps the puck keep moving in the right direction. Can play a very strong game, as well, although could do better at maintaining discipline. Has been passed on the Toronto depth chart, but still worth keeping an eye on.
Even with so many breathtaking young talents already established in the NHL, the Maple Leafs still have an upper echelon system bursting with the next wave. Fully rebuilt from Brian Burke’s mismanagement, Toronto has been able to target different types of players giving the system both breadth and depth. The next question the management team will have to answer is how it plans to integrate their youth now that there is legitimate NHL talent up and down the NHL roster.
]]>
The analysis will focus on the first five rounds, as it is clear to most long-time observers that the final two rounds are often taken up with long-shots, favours to regional scouts, and a myriad of other reasons. I will, of course, call out some astute late picks, but will not judge a team for the names called in the final hour. The apocryphal story of Pekka Rinne, drafted as an eighth round after-thought in 2004 based mostly on his play in game warm-ups. Few other scouts would have seen him at all, and he has had a very good career, which is not yet over. For the most part, though, those picks have little statistical likelihood of having NHL careers and teams should not be judged there.
Each draft class will be graded using the 20-80 scale that we use in our player specific scouting reports throughout the site. In this context, a 50 is essentially an average grade in light of the picks the team had on draft day. A 20 would mean the draft is an unmitigated disaster while an 80 would be the best draft class of all time. As those things can only be truly seen in retrospect, most classes will trend towards 50 at this point, so pay attention to those we see as outliers.
Finally, all grades are incomplete. Actual winners and losers in this draft class will not be known until 2023 at the earliest, after those who will have “made it” will have played out their entry-level contracts. What I am looking at here is whether, knowing what we know now, the drafting team got good value.
| RD | # | CS | MCK | PLAYER | P | AGE | HT/WT | TEAM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | 6-E | 20 | Timothy LILJEGREN | D | 18 | 6-0/190 | Rogle (Swe) |
| 2 | 59 | 32-N | 58 | Eemeli RASANEN | D | 18 | 6-7/215 | Kingston (OHL) |
| 4 | 110 | 3-NG | 109 | Ian SCOTT | G | 18 | 6-3/175 | Prince Albert (WHL) |
| 4 | 124 | NR | Vladislav KARA | LW | 19 | 6-2/190 | Bars Kazan (Rus 2) | |
| 5 | 141 | 104-N | hm | Fedor GORDEEV | D | 18 | 6-6/215 | Ham-Fnt (OHL) |
| 6 | 172 | 107-N | hm | Ryan MCGREGOR | C | 18 | 6-0/160 | Sarnia (OHL) |
| 7 | 203 | 208-N | hm | Ryan O'CONNELL | D | 18 | 6-1/170 | St. Andrew's (CHS-O) |
| RD | # | PLAYER | P | TEAM | GP (W) | G (L) | A (T) | PTS (GA) | PIM (Sv%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | Timothy LILJEGREN | D | Rogle (Swe) | 19 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| 1 | 17 | Rogle (Swe Jr) | 12 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 8 | ||
| 1 | 17 | Timra (Swe 2) | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||
| 2 | 59 | Eemeli RASANEN | D | Kingston (OHL) | 66 | 6 | 33 | 39 | 41 |
| 4 | 110 | Ian SCOTT | G | Prince Albert (WHL) | 12 | 31 | 3 | 3.69 | 0.895 |
| 4 | 124 | Vladislav KARA | LW | Bars Kazan (Rus 2) | 34 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 4 |
| 4 | 124 | Irbis (MHL) | 31 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 10 | ||
| 5 | 141 | Fedor GORDEEV | D | Ham-Fnt (OHL) | 64 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 45 |
| 6 | 172 | Ryan MCGREGOR | C | Sarnia (OHL) | 65 | 14 | 13 | 27 | 16 |
| 7 | 203 | Ryan O'CONNELL | D | St. Andrew's (CHS-O) | 47 | 6 | 27 | 33 | 18 |
Toronto Maple Leafs – Draft Grade: 45
After years of focusing on high end skills, compiling draft picks by the bushelful to beef up the system, the Maple Leafs have taken a more traditional approach this year, focusing their draft on the blueline, which remained underserved by the draft hauls of the past few years.

Their first two picks represent that yin and yang of defense types, with first rounder Timothy Liljegren a prototype of the modern, fast-faster-fastest style defender. He is a fantastic skater who plays hard in all three zones, but fell on draft boards after starting the year in the small group of players considered as top shelf picks, due to being shuffled between multiple levels of competition and a bout with mono.

Their second rounder, Eemeli Rasanen, a Finnish import playing with Kingston in the OHL, is gigantic and his skating can be called good for his size, if I am being generous. He is a physical force and has a canon from the point. He needs to be more aggressive with closing gaps if his foot speed is not to hamper his development.
After those two, the Leafs went with projects with their other five picks. Goaltender Ian Scott has fans due to his athleticism and experience seeing a lot of shots per game, but loses some of them due to being unable to stop enough of them. Fifth rounder Fedor Gordeev is a Russia-born, Toronto-area raised defencemen of Rasanen-like proportions, although without the history of offensive production.
Best value: Timothy Liljegren, D, Rogle (1/17): The one player in this draft class with the potential to make the 17th overall slot look like a steal. If he returns to Rogle next season healthy and confident, he has elite two-way potential. Decision making also needs to improve, but that should come with added experience and consistent ice time.
Biggest head-scratcher: Vladislav Kara, C, Bars Kazan (4/124): I considered Scott for this slot, as I prefer goaltenders who stop pucks, but with Scott, at least the greater scouting community was known to be on his tail. Kara, an overager, is more of a black box. He never played in the KHL or in any official international tournament for Russia. He has produced moderately at the Russian junior level, but there was more tested players with upside still available here and no indication that Kara would not have been available with one of the Leafs’ later picks.
]]>Eemeli Rasanen wins the 2017 draft award for prospect most likely to be unfairly compared to Zdeno Chara on the basis of height alone. Standing 6-7”, and with a marked offensive bent to his game, the Finnish import had a strong rookie season in the OHL, helping Kingston get to the second round of the OHL playoffs, before returning to Europe to represent Finland at the WU18s.
While Rasanen does not have the mean streak that marked Chara’s play, he does put his massive frame to good use. He is very tough to play against in the corners. Further, as long as he can keep his man in front of him, he can be hard to get past with his long reach and his proclivity for closing gaps. Therein also lies his main weakness. With some larger prospects, you will read that he is a good skater for his size, even if he would lose footraces to average sized opponents. Not so with Rasanen. He is simply slow of foot.
This was more apparent in the wider rinks of Europe, and raised some eyebrows at the WU18 for the wrong reasons, but it remains a concern for NHL scouts. If a team thinks that specialized training can improve his skating to at least average, he will be a great weapon, able to provide offense from the blueline while demonstrating a good head for the game. On the other hand, as the overwhelming majority of his OHL offense (30 of 39 points) came on the man advantage, his ceiling may be more limited in that side of the game than presently appears to be the case.
A note on the 20-80 scale used below. We look at five attributes (skating, shooting, puck skills, hockey IQ and physicality) for skaters and six for goalies (athleticism/quickness, compete/temperament, vision/play reading, technique/style, rebound control and puck handling). Each individual attribute is graded along the 20-80 scales, which includes half-grades. The idea is that a projection of 50 in a given attribute meant that our observer believed that the player could get to roughly NHL average at that attribute at maturity.
| Eemeli Resanen | 2017 Draft Eligible |
|---|---|
| Position: D, Shoots R | H/W: 6-7", 215 lbs |
| Stats to date (GP-G-A-PTS-PIMS) | Kingston Frontenacs, OHL (66-6-33-39-41) |
| Finland U18, WU18 (6-1-0-1-2) |

Skating: Rasanen has the skating for a defenseman, a BIG defenseman, yet is still able to skate backwards without disrupting his backward strides and square up the opposing forward. For a big defenseman, he has a decent stride, although not like the other defenseman moving up the ice. He can still be a part of the play without falling behind. Grade: 55
Shot: He needs more work on his shot when he is a stand-alone shooter. In the playoffs, he took a high number of slap shots that missed the net and did not complement his teammates on secondary chances. He likes to take one timers near the blue line and gets in great position to take shots, but he is looking at the defender when he shoots so he is shooting at him when he should be looking to the outside of the blocker to have the puck at least go through him maybe have a chance to hit the net. Grade: 50
Skills: Very surprised at how well Rasanen can move the puck up the ice with his big frame. His skating makes him look like a clumsy player with the puck, but his slick stick work allows him to be in a transitional play with his forwards to either pass the puck at the offensive zone entry or move the puck in himself. He understands his big frame is a challenge for opposing players and uses the extra time to make smart quick passes to open teammates or teammates in a better position on the ice than he is. Grade: 55
Smarts: Rasanen is a crafty smart giant that any team would be able to appreciate. At the start of the season he was extremely uncomfortable playing the stretch with his defensive partner whenever they had to close the gaps. He made it work by the end of the season as he finally got comfortable using his big frame to close out the gaps and drag opposing puck possessors to the walls or push them to dump the puck in. An extremely smart defenseman that can play a decent two-way game and can potentially double his offensive output next season. Grade: 60
Physicality: He is active on the clean side of the game when it comes to pushing players against the boards or holding opponents along the boards by placing his leg between the opponent’s legs and using his body weight to take them out of the play. However, he needs to understand that he can really do damage to someone and create an intimidating style of aggressive play that causes players with the puck to be scared to be even close to him. In other words, look at how big he is - he should score much higher here. Grade: 55
Summary: Eemeli Rasanen is probably the tallest player in the draft this year and produced decent numbers in his first season in the OHL. Playing on the North American ice surface for the first time this season, of course he was going to be uncomfortable and struggle, but he continued to improve all the way through the playoffs. He played with more confidence as the season wore on, and it showed up in his defensive play. His puck handling capabilities need a bit of improvement to go along with his skating to become more of an offensive factor for the Frontenacs next season. He has the raw potential to be a special defenseman next season and any NHL team that drafts him is getting a good prospect that is committed to developing his play on and off the ice.
| Zach Gallant | 2017 Draft Eligible |
|---|---|
| Position: C, Shoots L | H/W: 6-2", 190 lbs |
| Stats to date (GP-G-A-PTS-PIMS) | Peterborough Petes, OHL (60-21-26-47-74) |

Skating: Gallant's best attribute that he brings to the game is his acceleration when he receives the puck. On one hand when he collects around the neutral zone, his acceleration carries him across the o-zone entry without opponents seeing him. on the other he can also use his acceleration in the defensive zone to increase the damage of his attempted hit or to move the puck out of the zone. He needs work on his first stride otherwise he would have a higher grade and he would be a difference maker on the offense, but his acceleration comes from his cross over instead of the first stride. Grade: 55
Shot: Shooting is decent, he has many options from an accurate wrist shot to a decent looking slap shot. The problem is that there is no power from either shot when he is skating. When he would be coming up the ice with the puck on a break out, aim it high, hitting the goaltender in the waist area most of the time, but he rarely puts much strength in his shots, making them easy saves for the goalie. However, when he is standing still and has time to put pressure on the puck he can release a strong shot, which is why he was effective on the powerplay. Grade: 55
Skills: Gallant has above average puck handling skills that allow him to move around the defensive zone and neutral zone when players are behind him or transitioning to defense, giving him an edge. However, when he enters the offensive zone and he has opponents in front of him he has a hard time moving around defensemen, even at an average height and it causes him to delay the play in the corner or worse, lose the puck in a 50/50 battle. Looks to pass the puck in the offensive zone and can make a quick play. Grade: 55
Smarts: Gallant is a frustrating player to watch because he is a decent two-way forward that can be a difference maker, but there is something in his head that tells him to not play in the first period, but play hard in the third period. He is extremely inconsistent and there were times in the playoffs that he did not see ice time in a given period. He understands how to read plays and get himself open, but I question if he has the confidence to play as an effective center at a higher level. Grade: 50
Physicality: A capable physical player as he puts up five good hits per game on average. He is there on the forecheck making the right plays and he often causes a stir behind the opposing net or in the corners. His problem is he cannot be physical with the puck as he tends to lose the 50/50 battles at an alarming rate. Grade: 55
Summary: Zach Gallant is an intriguing prospect with the size and skills to potentially be a bottom six forward, but needs a lot of work to make it to the next level. The NHL team that drafts him needs to work hard on his mental development as it is his biggest weakness heading into the draft and his failure to score a single goal in two rounds of the 2017 playoffs is proof of that shortcoming. A reputation for inconsistency and laziness will cause him to go lower in the draft, but there is hope. He has decent skating skills and a shooting style that normally hits the target. He can be a decent defensive forward when he wants to be and has potential to make the NHL, but again, the team that takes a chance on him will need to put in a ton of work to get a return on their investment.
]]>Nico Hischier will make National Hockey League history as the first name called in Chicago at the 2017 NHL Entry Draft.
The New Jersey Devils hold the first overall selection having won the draft lottery, and will be looking at three prospects in particular who have risen to the top of the 2017 draft class.

Hischier is a very attractive choice having 'checked all the boxes' during an outstanding North American debut with the Halifax Mooseheads. The native of Naters, Switzerland led all rookie scorers in the QMJHL and finished 10th in league scoring, while delivering strong performances for his country at both the U20 and U18 World Junior Championships (WJC).
A fast and dynamic skater with high-end puck skills, Hischier distinguished himself for his two-way diligence and his ability to contribute in every area of the ice and - by extension - the game. He possesses a high hockey IQ and is a very creative player combining both structure and innovation.
It will be an agonizing decision if New Jersey opts to pass on Hischier in favour of the other prime attraction - Nolan Patrick of the Brandon Wheat Kings.
The Winnipeg native entered the 2016-17 season as the consensus top choice after a standout season in which he tied for the league playoff scoring lead with 30 points in 21 games (13-17-30) and earned WHL Playoff MVP honours.

Patrick was injured during that playoff run however and underwent sports hernia surgery last July. His groin/abdominal problems would re-surface after playing in Brandon's opening five games, and sideline him for 34 games and force him to miss the U20 WJC.
Returning in January, Patrick still managed to finish fifth on the Wheat Kings in scoring with 20 goals and 46 points despite playing in just 33 games.
However he suffered another health setback late in the regular season - an unspecified upper-body injury - and missed the WHL playoffs.
Nolan Patrick would be the first Manitoban selected first overall in the NHL draft - with Nico Hischier set to become the first-ever Swiss-born player.
A third option emerged for New Jersey this spring at the U18 WJC where defenceman Miro Heiskanen turned in a commanding performance for Finland and effectively threw his hat into the ring.

It makes some sense for the Devils to consider adding a potential building block on the blueline given the loss of Adam Larsson in last summer's Taylor Hall deal.
Heiskanen would be the first Finnish-born player to go first overall.
CENTRE STAGE
Gabriel Vilardi of the Windsor Spitfires sits at No. 4 on the McKeen's Top 125 - ranking the best prospects available for the 2017 NHL Entry Draft.

The 6-foot-3, 200-pound forward led Windsor with 29 goals and 61 points - in just 49 games - and then played a central role in helping the Spitfires win the Memorial Cup, highlighted by a four-assist performance in a win over the top-ranked Erie Otters.
Big, highly-skilled, and ultra competitive, Vilardi brings plenty of meat to the plate - but the skating has raised concerns about how impactful an NHLer he can be. Described as a 'knock kneed' skater, he will have to continue upgrading his quickness and explosiveness.
The Kingston, Ontario native can play on the wing but showcased at the Top Prospects Game in January that he is very effective playing in the middle.
The fifth-ranked prospect is Casey Mittelstadt, the top American-born player.
Mittelstadt ripped apart the high school circuit averaging 2.56 points per game (64 points in 25 games) and earning Minnesota’s distinguished Mr. Hockey award as the state’s top senior skater. He fell short though of leading his hometown Eden Prairie to a state championship, falling in the semi-finals.
Mittelstadt was questioned about returning for his senior year amid concerns that his development could be stunted. However, he helped allay some of those concerns with impressive stints in the USHL, wrapped around his high school season, recording 30 points in 24 games - for a 1.25 points-per-game average which was tops in the league.
Sharp-shooting winger Owen Tippett of the Mississauga Steelheads is next at No. 6.
The Peterborough, Ontario native infuriated with his inconsistent (and incomplete) defensive work habits but, at the end of the day, may be the best goal-scoring prospect in this draft class.
He finished fifth in the OHL with 44 goals and added another 10 goals in 20 playoff games.
Slick-skating defenceman Cale Makar of the Brooks Bandits is ranked seventh.
The Calgary, Alberta native was among this season's biggest risers - shooting up the draft chart and dazzling with his skating and skills while leading Brooks to the RBC Cup final.
Makar still has plenty of growing to do in terms of learning how to harness and deploy his exceptional talents. His education will be in good hands for his upcoming freshman season at the University of Massachusetts. Makar may benefit most by staying on the NCAA collegiate route for at least two years, though the lure of the NHL is all powerful.
Sorting out the rest of the top 10 has been a convoluted journey since the initial rankings were published last fall. That's not unusual - but this season the rankings seemed to be in a larger state of flux. There's not much to separate the next dozen or so players - all of whom could conceivably land a top 10 spot.

Cody Glass of the Portland Winterhawks was another big riser, moving up from 24th - in the preliminary ranking - to grab the No. 8 position.
A cerebral two-way pivot with good size and skill, the Winnipeg native led Portland and tied for seventh in WHL scoring during a spectacular breakout season - in which he more than tripled his rookie numbers from 2015-16.
Glass begins a run of centremen with seven of the next ten players being pivots; Michael Rasmussen (10th), Elias Pettersson (11th), Martin Necas (12th), Robert Thomas (15th), Nick Suzuki (16th), and Lias Andersson (17th).
KLIM PICKINGS
The wildcards for this year's draft will begin with swift-skating Swedish defenceman Timothy Liljegren
The native of Kristianstad, Sweden has been a prime name for 2017 since he was 16 years old - and was ranked No. 4 on our preliminary list. However, he was sidelined early by a bout of mononucleosis and struggled to find his game after returning.
There's no denying the physical gifts as he is a strong, fast skater with a good skill set featuring a heavy wristshot.

However, his hockey sense and overall decision making have continually come into question as the scrutiny on his game intensified. He doesn't seem to possess an innate feel for pressure and can be prone to stickchecks and turning pucks over on outlets. Can this part of his make-up develop and mature? Perhaps. It's a risk NHL teams must weigh before considering him as a top selection.
Another 'hot potato' pick will be Dynamo Moscow forward Klim Kostin who began the season at No. 5 in the rankings following a solid showing at the Ivan Hlinka Memorial. The Penza native captained Russia and led his team in scoring (5-4-3-7) while flashing an intriguing mix of size, skill and creativity.
He also put in a decent showing at the Canada-Russia series in November, albeit not enough for World Junior team coach Valeri Bragin to include him on the U20 roster. However, Kostin underwent season-ending shoulder surgery in January and missed an opportunity to further convince NHL scouts at the U18 WJC in April.
Strong and skilled with the puck, Kostin can create openings with his stickhandling and 1-on-1 abilities, but must work on his skating and consistency.

Eeli Tolvanen also watched his stock soften as the season progressed after beginning as a top 10 pick (8th).
The native of Vihti, Finland tied for third in the USHL with 30 goals and then helped Sioux City reach the Clark Cup Finals. Tolvanen possesses sharp offensive instincts and a lethal shot, yet there are concerns about how his slight frame and dimensional game will translate to higher levels.
No player fell further in the rankings this season than towering Russian winger Nikita Popugaev.
The Moscow native fired 19 goals in his first 25 games with Moose Jaw, however his play tailed off in December and he was dealt a month later to Prince George where he continued to sputter.
Popugaev brings great size at 6-foot-6 and 220 pounds as well as a strong shooting arsenal. His skating needs to come along though, particularly his footwork and overall agility.
But the bigger concern is how badly he wants it - as his work ethic and defensive play regressed to alarming levels over the second half.
PLENTY OF FINNISH
Finland gave advance warning that they would be a big factor at the 2017 NHL Draft when they captured gold at the 2016 U18 WJC.
It was Finland's first gold medal at the event since winning the first two tournaments in 1999 and 2000 - and was accomplished with a predominantly underage blueline.
They followed up this year at the U18's with a silver medal, led by the splendid duo of Miro Heiskanen and Urho Vaakanainen.
Heiskanen's exploits were well chronicled, however Vaakanainen's play may have turned just as many NHL heads. His smooth skating, subtle skills, and innate feel for the game were on full display throughout.
Vaakanainen could turn out to be one of the best players from this draft.
Expect the Finns to be high profile at this draft - as they could place up to seven players in the opening round plus another half dozen in the second.
In all, there are 16 Finnish-born players in the McKeen's Top 125 including a number of potential sleepers such as Joni Ikonen (59th), Aleksi Heponiemi (65th), Emil Oksanen (76th) and U18 WJC captain Aarne Talvitie (77th).

Gritty two-way centre Santeri Virtanen threw his name into the ring with an impressive showing at the U18 WJC after missing most of the season to injury.
His late rise wasn't a total surprise as he had initially been slotted as a potential 50-70 pick after a good showing at the Ivan Hlinka last fall.
| RANK | PLAYER | POS | TEAM | HT/WT | DOB | Nation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nolan Patrick | C | Brandon (WHL) | 6-2/200 | 19-Sep-98 | Canada |
| 2 | Nico Hischier | C | Halifax (QMJHL) | 6-1/175 | 4-Jan-99 | Switzerland |
| 3 | Miro Heiskanen | D | HIFK Helsinki (Fin) | 6-0/170 | 18-Jul-99 | Finland |
| 4 | Gabriel Vilardi | C | Windsor (OHL) | 6-3/200 | 16-Aug-99 | Canada |
| 5 | Casey Mittelstadt | C | Eden Prairie (USHS-MN) | 6-1/200 | 22-Nov-98 | USA |
| 6 | Owen Tippett | RW | Mississauga (OHL) | 6-1/200 | 16-Feb-99 | Canada |
| 7 | Cale Makar | D | Brooks (AJHL) | 5-11/180 | 30-Oct-98 | Canada |
| 8 | Cody Glass | C | Portland (WHL) | 6-2/180 | 1-Apr-99 | Canada |
| 9 | Kristian Vesalainen | LW | Frolunda (Swe) | 6-3/205 | 1-Jun-99 | Finland |
| 10 | Michael Rasmussen | C | Tri-City (WHL) | 6-6/215 | 17-Apr-99 | Canada |
| 11 | Elias Pettersson | C | Timra (Swe 2) | 6-2/165 | 12-Nov-98 | Sweden |
| 12 | Martin Necas | C | Kometa Brno (Cze) | 6-0/170 | 15-Jan-99 | Czech |
| 13 | Urho Vaakanainen | D | JyP Jyvaskyla (Fin) | 6-0/185 | 1-Jan-99 | Finland |
| 14 | Juuso Valimaki | D | Tri-City (WHL) | 6-2/205 | 6-Oct-98 | Finland |
| 15 | Robert Thomas | C | London (OHL) | 6-0/190 | 2-Jul-99 | Canada |
| 16 | Nick Suzuki | C | Owen Sound (OHL) | 5-11/185 | 10-Sep-99 | Canada |
| 17 | Lias Andersson | C | HV 71 (Swe) | 5-11/200 | 13-Oct-98 | Sweden |
| 18 | Isaac Ratcliffe | LW | Guelph (OHL) | 6-5/200 | 15-Feb-99 | Canada |
| 19 | Erik Brannstrom | D | HV 71 (Swe) | 5-10/175 | 2-Sep-99 | Sweden |
| 20 | Timothy Liljegren | D | Rogle (Swe) | 6-0/190 | 30-Apr-99 | Sweden |
| 21 | Klim Kostin | C | Dynamo Moscow (Rus) | 6-3/195 | 5-May-99 | Russia |
| 22 | Eeli Tolvanen | RW | Sioux City (USHL) | 5-10/175 | 22-Apr-99 | Finland |
| 23 | Conor Timmins | D | Sault Ste Marie (OHL) | 6-1/185 | 18-Sep-98 | Canada |
| 24 | Kailer Yamamoto | RW | Spokane (WHL) | 5-8/160 | 29-Sep-98 | Canada |
| 25 | Jason Robertson | LW | Kingston (OHL) | 6-2/195 | 22-Jul-99 | USA |
| 26 | Ryan Poehling | C | St. Cloud State (NCHC) | 6-2/195 | 3-Jan-99 | USA |
| 27 | Nicolas Hague | D | Mississauga (OHL) | 6-6/215 | 5-Dec-98 | Canada |
| 28 | Josh Norris | C | NTDP (USA) | 6-1/195 | 5-May-99 | USA |
| 29 | Shane Bowers | C | Waterloo (USHL) | 6-1/185 | 30-Jul-99 | Canada |
| 30 | Cal Foote | D | Kelowna (WHL) | 6-4/215 | 13-Dec-98 | USA |
| 31 | Henri Jokiharju | D | Portland (WHL) | 6-0/180 | 17-Jun-99 | Finland |
| 32 | Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen | G | HPK (Fin) | 6-4/195 | 9-Mar-99 | Finland |
| 33 | Jaret Anderson-Dolan | C | Spokane (WHL) | 5-11/190 | 12-Sep-99 | Canada |
| 34 | Kole Lind | RW | Kelowna (WHL) | 6-1/180 | 16-Oct-98 | Canada |
| 35 | Jesper Boqvist | C | Brynas (Swe) | 6-0/180 | 30-Oct-98 | Sweden |
| 36 | Grant Mismash | LW | NTDP (USA) | 6-0/185 | 19-Feb-99 | USA |
| 37 | Keith Petruzzelli | G | Muskegon (USHL) | 6-5/180 | 9-Feb-99 | USA |
| 38 | Pierre-Olivier Joseph | D | Charlottetown (QMJHL) | 6-2/165 | 1-Jul-99 | Canada |
| 39 | Maxime Comtois | C | Victoriaville (QMJHL) | 6-2/200 | 8-Jan-99 | Canada |
| 40 | Adam Ruzicka | C | Sarnia (OHL) | 6-4/205 | 11-May-99 | Slovakia |
| 41 | Morgan Frost | C | Sault Ste Marie (OHL) | 5-11/170 | 14-May-99 | Canada |
| 42 | Filip Chytil | C | Zlin (Cze) | 6-0/180 | 5-Sep-99 | Czech |
| 43 | Nikita Popugaev | LW | Prince George (WHL) | 6-6/220 | 20-Nov-98 | Russia |
| 44 | Jake Oettinger | G | Boston University (HE) | 6-4/210 | 18-Dec-98 | USA |
| 45 | Josh Brook | D | Moose Jaw (WHL) | 6-1/185 | 15-Jun-99 | Canada |
| 46 | Santeri Virtanen | C | TPS Turku (Fin Jr) | 6-2/195 | 11-May-99 | Finland |
| 47 | Kyle Olson | C | Tri-City (WHL) | 5-11/165 | 22-Mar-99 | Canada |
| 48 | Evan Barratt | C | NTDP (USA) | 6-0/190 | 18-Feb-99 | USA |
| 49 | Max Gildon | D | NTDP (USA) | 6-3/190 | 17-May-99 | USA |
| 50 | MacKenzie Entwistle | RW | Hamilton (OHL) | 6-3/180 | 14-Jul-99 | Canada |
| 51 | Stelio Mattheos | RW | Brandon (WHL) | 6-1/195 | 14-Jun-99 | Canada |
| 52 | Marcus Davidsson | C | Djurgardens (Swe) | 6-0/190 | 18-Nov-98 | Sweden |
| 53 | Michael DiPietro | G | Windsor (OHL) | 6-0/195 | 9-Jun-99 | Canada |
| 54 | David Farrance | D | NTDP (USA) | 5-11/190 | 23-Jun-99 | USA |
| 55 | Stuart Skinner | G | Lethbridge (WHL) | 6-3/210 | 1-Nov-98 | Canada |
| 56 | Matthew Strome | LW | Hamilton (OHL) | 6-4/210 | 6-Jan-99 | Canada |
| 57 | Alex Formenton | LW | London (OHL) | 6-2/165 | 13-Sep-99 | Canada |
| 58 | Eemeli Rasanen | D | Kingston (OHL) | 6-7/215 | 6-Mar-99 | Finland |
| 59 | Joni Ikonen | C | Frolunda (Swe Jr) | 5-10/170 | 14-Apr-99 | Finland |
| 60 | Scott Reedy | C | NTDP (USA) | 6-1/205 | 4-Apr-99 | USA |
| 61 | Sasha Chmelevski | C | Ottawa (OHL) | 5-11/190 | 9-Jun-99 | USA |
| 62 | Filip Westerlund | D | Frolunda (Swe) | 5-11/180 | 17-Apr-99 | Sweden |
| 63 | Ian Mitchell | D | Spruce Grove (AJHL) | 5-11/175 | 18-Jan-99 | Canada |
| 64 | Maxim Zhukov | G | Green Bay (USHL) | 6-3/190 | 22-Jul-99 | Russia |
| 65 | Aleksi Heponiemi | C | Swift Current (WHL) | 5-10/150 | 9-Jan-99 | Finland |
| 66 | Ostap Safin | LW | Sparta Praha (Cze Jr) | 6-4/200 | 11-Feb-99 | Czech |
| 67 | Jack Studnicka | C | Oshawa (OHL) | 6-1/170 | 18-Feb-99 | Canada |
| 68 | Nick Henry | RW | Regina (WHL) | 5-11/190 | 4-Jul-99 | Canada |
| 69 | Markus Phillips | D | Owen Sound (OHL) | 6-0/200 | 21-Mar-99 | Canada |
| 70 | Jarret Tyszka | D | Seattle (WHL) | 6-2/190 | 15-Mar-99 | Canada |
| 71 | Kirill Maksimov | RW | Niagara (OHL) | 6-2/195 | 1-Jun-99 | Russia |
| 72 | Jake Leschyshyn | C | Regina (WHL) | 5-11/185 | 10-Mar-99 | Canada |
| 73 | Alexei Toropchenko | RW | MVD Balashikha (Rus Jr) | 6-3/190 | 25-Jun-99 | Russia |
| 74 | Kirill Slepets | LW | Loko Yaroslavl (Rus Jr) | 5-10/165 | 6-Apr-99 | Russia |
| 75 | Olle Eriksson Ek | G | Farjestads (Swe Jr) | 6-2/185 | 22-Jun-99 | Sweden |
| 76 | Emil Oksanen | LW | Espoo United (Fin 2) | 6-1/190 | 25-Sep-98 | Finland |
| 77 | Aarne Talvitie | C | Espoo Blues (Fin Jr) | 5-10/200 | 11-Feb-99 | Finland |
| 78 | Reilly Walsh | D | Proctor Academy (USHS-NH) | 5-11/180 | 21-Apr-99 | USA |
| 79 | Ivan Lodnia | RW | Erie (OHL) | 5-10/180 | 31-Aug-99 | USA |
| 80 | Jonah Gadjovich | LW | Owen Sound (OHL) | 6-2/210 | 12-Oct-98 | Canada |
| 81 | Ben Mirageas | D | Chicago (USHL) | 6-1/180 | 8-May-99 | USA |
| 82 | Dylan Samberg | D | Hermantown (USHS-MN) | 6-3/190 | 24-Jan-99 | USA |
| 83 | Antoine Morand | C | Acadie-Bathurst (QMJHL) | 5-10/180 | 18-Feb-99 | Canada |
| 84 | Morgan Geekie | C | Tri-City (WHL) | 6-2/180 | 20-Jul-98 | Canada |
| 85 | Alexei Lipanov | C | MVD Balashikha (Rus 2) | 6-0/165 | 17-Aug-99 | Russia |
| 86 | Jack Badini | C | Chicago (USHL) | 6-0/200 | 19-Jan-98 | USA |
| 87 | Brady Lyle | D | North Bay (OHL) | 6-1/205 | 6-Jun-99 | Canada |
| 88 | Lucas Elvenes | C | Rogle (Swe Jr) | 6-0/175 | 18-Aug-99 | Sweden |
| 89 | Zach Gallant | C | Peterborough (OHL) | 6-2/190 | 6-Mar-99 | Canada |
| 90 | Lane Zablocki | RW | Red Deer (WHL) | 5-11/190 | 27-Dec-98 | Canada |
| 91 | Kevin Hancock | C | Owen Sound (OHL) | 5-11/185 | 2-Mar-98 | Canada |
| 92 | Alexandre Texier | C | Grenoble (Fra) | 6-0/190 | 13-Sep-99 | France |
| 93 | Noel Hoefenmayer | D | Ottawa (OHL) | 6-0/190 | 6-Jan-99 | Canada |
| 94 | Nate Schnarr | C | Guelph (OHL) | 6-3/180 | 15-Jun-99 | Canada |
| 95 | Jonas Rondbjerg | RW | Vaxjo Lakers (Swe Jr) | 6-0/175 | 31-Mar-99 | Denmark |
| 96 | Ivan Chekhovich | LW | Baie-Comeau (QMJHL) | 5-10/180 | 14-Jan-99 | Russia |
| 97 | Robin Salo | D | Sport (Fin) | 6-1/190 | 13-Oct-98 | Finland |
| 98 | Luke Martin | D | Michigan (B1G) | 6-4/215 | 20-Sep-98 | USA |
| 99 | Cale Fleury | D | Kootenay (WHL) | 6-1/205 | 19-Nov-98 | Canada |
| 100 | Mikey Anderson | D | Waterloo (USHL) | 6-0/195 | 25-May-99 | USA |
| 101 | Mason Shaw | C | Medicine Hat (WHL) | 5-9/180 | 3-Nov-98 | Canada |
| 102 | Linus Nyman | RW | Kingston (OHL) | 5-9/160 | 11-Jul-99 | Finland |
| 103 | Gustav Lindstrom | D | Almtuna (Swe 2) | 6-2/190 | 20-Oct-98 | Sweden |
| 104 | Marian Studenic | RW | Hamilton (OHL) | 6-0/165 | 28-Oct-98 | Slovakia |
| 105 | Jack Rathbone | D | Dexter (USHS-MA) | 5-10/175 | 20-May-99 | USA |
| 106 | Artyom Minulin | D | Swift Current (WHL) | 6-2/200 | 1-Oct-98 | Russia |
| 107 | Kalle Miketinac | C | Frolunda (Swe Jr) | 5-11/190 | 2-Apr-99 | Sweden |
| 108 | Dmitri Samorukov | D | Guelph (OHL) | 6-2/180 | 16-Jun-99 | Russia |
| 109 | Ian Scott | G | Prince Albert (WHL) | 6-3/175 | 11-Jan-99 | Canada |
| 110 | Austen Keating | C | Ottawa (OHL) | 6-0/170 | 7-May-99 | Canada |
| 111 | Maksim Sushko | RW | Owen Sound (OHL) | 6-0/185 | 10-Feb-99 | Belarus |
| 112 | Tyler Inamoto | D | NTDP (USA) | 6-2/195 | 6-May-99 | USA |
| 113 | Ty Lewis | LW | Brandon (WHL) | 5-11/180 | 5-Mar-98 | Canada |
| 114 | Drake Batherson | C | Cape Breton (QMJHL) | 6-1/190 | 27-Apr-98 | Canada |
| 115 | Rickard Hugg | C | Leksands (Swe Jr) | 5-10/185 | 18-Jan-99 | Sweden |
| 116 | Scott Walford | D | Victoria (WHL) | 6-1/195 | 12-Jan-99 | Canada |
| 117 | Jordy Bellerive | C | Lethbridge (WHL) | 5-10/195 | 2-May-99 | Canada |
| 118 | Matthew Kellenberger | D | Oakville (OJHL) | 6-0/175 | 11-Jan-99 | Canada |
| 119 | Johnathan Kovacevic | D | Merrimack (HE) | 6-4/215 | 2-Jul-97 | Canada |
| 120 | Nick Campoli | C | North York (OJHL) | 5-11/190 | 16-Feb-99 | Canada |
| 121 | Mario Ferraro | D | Des Moines (USHL) | 5-11/185 | 17-Sep-98 | Canada |
| 122 | Michael Pastujov | LW | NTDP (USA) | 6-0/195 | 23-Aug-99 | USA |
| 123 | Tyler Steenbergen | C | Swift Current (WHL) | 5-10/190 | 7-Jan-98 | Canada |
| 124 | Mark Rubinchik | D | Saskatoon (WHL) | 6-0/180 | 21-Mar-99 | Russia |
| 125 | Kasper Kotkansalo | D | Sioux Falls (USHL) | 6-2/200 | 16-Nov-98 | Finland |
Team Finland were playing without some key high-end prospects in Eeli Tolvanen, Kristian Vesalainen and Juuso Valimaki - away at the U-20 camp in the United States.
Two defencemen and two forwards stood out for the Finns at the Ivan Hlinka, but the only one who, IMO, looked like a solid first-round candidate was Urho Vaakanainen.
FORWARDS
Aleksi Heponiemi (2017), C, Swift Current (WHL) - Good playmaker...he'll be a fine WHL player, but remains to be seen whether he can overcome his lack of size to become a coveted pro prospect. (4-0-5-5)
Linus Nyman (2017), LW, Kingston (OHL) - Produced at the tournament, certainly has some offensive skills..but at a shade over 5-9 he'll be a late draft consideration. Will join Rasanen in Kingston this season. (4-3-4-7)
Lauri Pajuniemi (2017), RW, TPS Turku (Fin) - Youngest draft eligible player at the tournament...misses the 2017 draft by four days. Not overly big, he nevertheless was one of the more noticeable prospects...made things happen with diligent effort and speed even if he failed to produce. Might be a third-round consideration...perhaps the fourth, but package is there to get some consideration for the top 60. (4-1-0-1)
Samuel Parkkari (2017), LW, Tappara (Fin) - Has the size to be drafted, not sure he has the skill or skating. Late draft if he's taken. (4-0-0-0)

Santeri Virtanen (2017), LW, Dubuque (USHL) - Brings a nice size/skill combo...skates okay for a bigger guy, decent work ethic and puck skills. Liked how he progressed during the tournament and by the end was clearly their top forward prospect. 2nd or 3rd round is a possibility. (4-1-1-2)
DEFENCE

Eemeli Rasanen (2017), D, Kingston (OHL) - One of the bigger players in the event. For the most part plays a smart, simple game within his limitations. He'll be a reliable shutdown defender who skates okay and has decent puck moving ability. He'll get lots of attention playing in Kingston this season, should adapt well to the North American game. Looks like he may be a top 50 prospect. (4-0-1-1)
Eero Teravainen (2017), D, Lincoln (USHL) - Possesses a good point shot and some offensive abilities, but he's 5-10 and doesn't look like he'd cope well with NHL size and speed in the future. A longshot. (4-2-1-3)
Toni Utunen (2018), D, Tappara (Fin) - The only underaged prospect on the Finns...impressive for a 16-year-old to be cracking the U-18 team in a country with lots of defensive talent. Hopefully he still has a growth spurt..will likely be a key figure on next year's U-18 team. (4-0-0-0)
Urho Vaakanainen (2017), D, JyP Jyvaskyla (Fin) - One of the better defencemen at the tournament. He's a mobile puck mover, smart, poised and smooth. Looked like a first-round defenceman, perhaps even a consideration for the top 20. (4-0-1-1)
Saku Vesterinen (2017), D, Charlottetown (QMJHL) - Smooth skating blueliner with decent puck moving skills...he's undersized though, and lacks the jam to be an effective defender at this point. Someone to keep an eye on in the QMJHL, but looks like a later draft if any. (4-0-1-1)
Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen (2017), G, HPK (Fin) - May be one of the better goalie prospects given his size and athletic ability, but struggled to stop the puck with an 86 per cent save percentage. (2GP, 4.10, .864)
]]>