[04-May-2026 15:31:54 UTC] PHP Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Class 'WP_Widget' not found in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/widgets/mckeens_news_feed_widget.php:3
Stack trace:
#0 {main}
thrown in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/widgets/mckeens_news_feed_widget.php on line 3
[04-May-2026 15:31:55 UTC] PHP Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Class 'WP_Widget' not found in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/widgets/mckeens_sidebar_menu_widget.php:3
Stack trace:
#0 {main}
thrown in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/widgets/mckeens_sidebar_menu_widget.php on line 3
[04-May-2026 15:31:45 UTC] PHP Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to undefined function add_action() in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/shortcodes/mckeens_display_editorials.php:22
Stack trace:
#0 {main}
thrown in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/shortcodes/mckeens_display_editorials.php on line 22
[04-May-2026 15:31:46 UTC] PHP Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to undefined function add_action() in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/shortcodes/mckeens_display_tabs.php:50
Stack trace:
#0 {main}
thrown in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/shortcodes/mckeens_display_tabs.php on line 50
[04-May-2026 15:31:47 UTC] PHP Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to undefined function add_action() in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/shortcodes/mckeens_heading.php:15
Stack trace:
#0 {main}
thrown in /home/mckeens/public_html/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/inc/shortcodes/mckeens_heading.php on line 15
But what about the actual draft action itself? Like any draft, there were things that went according to script and there were surprises.
From our Top 100 on our final draft rankings, 97 of said players were drafted. The only ones not selected were Alex Zetterberg, Daniil Ustinkov, and Tomas Galvas. Galvas was the highest of those three at 70th overall.
Let’s take a look at some of my favourite selections, some of the biggest surprises, and some of the best undrafted players.
Dickinson had been our favorite defender in this class nearly all season long and we really like the value San Jose got at #11 after trading up from #14 a few days prior. Dickinson is such a safe bet to a top four defender for the organization; the kind of player who can eat serious minutes for them when they’re ready to take that next step again as a playoff contender.
This represents one of the best fits in the draft for us. Solberg improved so much in the second half, and we saw that at the World Championships, where he was a standout playing tough minutes against NHL players with Norway. His game still needs further refinement, but he projects as the perfect partner for the likes of Olen Zellweger or Pavel Mintyukov (even though all three are left-handed shots) with his physical intense defensive presence. It’s obvious Anaheim really liked him as they traded up into this slot with Toronto.
This one caught a lot of people by surprise on the draft floor. There was probably more talk that Parascak could be a “faller” due to concerns over pace/quickness, in combination with his average size. Even Parascak was incredibly surprised to be taken this early, with a look of bewilderment following the announcement of his name. Our Western scouts are still a bit leery of his NHL odds, but there’s no denying that he was one of the draft’s most intelligent players. Washington is banking on that, hoping that he can have a Joe Pavelski type career.
This one wasn’t as big of a surprise to those on the floor because there was a ton of chatter about this about an hour prior to the draft. However, it’s obvious Sennecke had no idea because he was visibly shocked to hear his name, creating one of the most genuine and honest draft reactions of the weekend. Anaheim is banking on Sennecke’s athletic upside and second half improvements, which is often an intelligent thing to do.
Look at all the teams clamoring to sign Jake Guentzel this offseason, because of how good of a complementary offensive player he is. Stiga proved that same thing this year, playing alongside potential 2025 first overall pick James Hagens. He’s a hard worker. He’s skilled. His skating improved over the year. There’s a ton to like and we really like the fit in Nashville for him. These are the types of players Nashville had an abundance of when they were dominating the West.
Admittedly, I was a bit worried that Carter George would drop a bit because of his lack of size in a size-crazed industry (concerning goaltenders). So, it was great to see George go in the second round to Los Angeles. There’s a deep-rooted connection to Owen Sound there and George is a heck of a goaltender. He’s so polished and refined already; he’s a big game goaltender.
Speaking of goaltenders, it was a shock to see 21-year-old Ilya Nabokov as the first netminder taken…and this early. Granted, his resume spoke for itself this year as the KHL’s playoff MVP. Colorado obviously wasn’t a big fan of their goaltending this year and by selecting Nabokov, they’re taking someone who can be a potential difference maker very soon, a lot sooner than your average draft eligible netminder.
Anaheim has had tremendous luck drafting electric offensive defenders like Smith in recent years. Mintyukov, Zellweger and Rodwin Dionicio all fit the mold. Zellweger even came from the same Everett (WHL) program as Smith. He is very raw. However, his offensive upside from the backend is extremely high. With such a strong and deep talent pool in place, Anaheim could afford to take a chance on him.
We ranked Shuravin #34 in our final rankings but did realize that we were higher on him than we expected him to be selected this weekend. It would appear that his weaker second half really pushed him down some draft boards. However, that’s Florida’s gain as they selected an athletic defender who showed some terrific flashes this year at both the KHL and MHL levels.
Personally, I had somewhat expected Mews to fall at the draft. I didn’t believe that he would be a top 40-45 pick. However, I also did not expect him to slide all the way to the mid third. He’s a fairly dynamic offensive defender. I certainly have questions about his projection, but this represents great value for Calgary, especially after they grabbed Zayne Parekh in the first.
We felt that Ruohonen was being massively underrated this year due to the fact that he stayed in the Finnish U20 league in order to preserve his NCAA eligibility. He’ll play in the USHL next year then head to Harvard. The physically imposing two-way power pivot is someone who could dramatically outperform his draft slot.
We get the concerns over the feet. Burrows needs to improve his skating. But the 2024 Mr. Hockey Award winner plays a mature, pro-style game. He is a strong playmaker, and he can find his way to the net. Once he fills out his frame, he could be a terrific middle six NHL player.
As someone who covers Ontario, I just didn’t see this one coming. I thought that maybe Hoskin had a chance to go late in the draft after a strong World Junior A Challenge performance, however, this early? It’s very, very rare to see a double re-entry selected from Canadian Tier 2, let alone almost in the Top 100. We’ll see how this one works out for Calgary in the long run.
I mean, how could we not include Kiviharju here. Yes, we expected him to fall. But, to the end of the fourth? So, what’s next for Kiviharju? Would he consider coming to the OHL next year to help recover his former top prospect status?
No question, we could have listed this as the biggest surprise of round five. Seeing Misa fall to the mid-5th round was shocking. However, this is also an excellent value pick by Calgary. Did Misa close out this past OHL season on a high note? No. But, does he have the skating ability, tenacity, and skill to be an NHL player in some capacity? Absolutely.
At some point, a player becomes just too good to pass up, even if you have concerns over projectability. In the 5th round, Poirier is terrific value for the Hurricanes. The size, skating, and IQ components of his game are dicey. But you can’t argue with the production and the offensive upside. Bottom line, you’re not going to find many guys in round five who could be top six scorers and that’s Poirier.
No offense intended to Graham, but when he was drafted, I turned to Derek (who also scouts the West for us) and asked him who? He was flabbergasted that Graham, a double overager, was selected. He didn’t come close to hitting the point per game mark as a 20-year-old and it certainly brings to light questions over NHL upside.
I get the hesitation from NHL scouts. Is his offensive skill set translatable? He’s purely a complementary guy; one of the “quietest” CHL leading scorers in recent memory. But, at some point you have to bet on players who think the game at an elite level and that’s Romani. One team used a 17th overall selection on a player with pace/strength concerns, but high-end hockey sense, and another used the 162nd overall pick. Who got the best value?
A re-entry out of the BCHL, Ashton is a really intriguing defensive prospect. He’s big. He’s mean. He’s athletic. He flashes high end skill. How it all comes together at a higher level remains to be seen. But we really like the upside. We also really like that he’s going to Minnesota State, a program that has developed defenders like him well.
Again, no offense meant to Leskovar, but Derek had the same reaction to him as I did Graham. If you had told me that Leskovar would be drafted ahead of Leenders, Fibigr, and Finn Harding from that same Mississauga team, I would have called you crazy. Leskovar is a big, mean, throwback on the back end. He got better this year in his first full year with the Steelheads. But an NHL draft selection?
It worked with Devon Levi. It could work again with Leenders. He’s on the smaller side, but he’s very athletic. Quick post to post and solid in scramble mode, Leenders just needs to refine his approach and improve technically. He’s capable of stealing games and he could end up being a draft steal when all is said and done, similar to the way Florida got Levi (then traded him to Buffalo).
We’ve had Pahlsson ranked for a few years now, so it was great to see him finally get selected after a solid year in the USHL. Again, there are some projection concerns over the athletic profile, but he finds a way to be productive. He’s intelligent. He’s shifty. He’s probably going to produce at the college level too with Minnesota.
Again, you hit a point in the draft where players are worth selecting despite some limitations. Mac Swanson’s size and skating combination are worrisome, but he’s one heck of a smart player. If he hits, he’s going to be a home run. The same could be said of Alex Zetterberg, the Swedish equivalent, who did nothing but produce this year. If you’re taking a chance on Swanson this late, Zetterberg deserved to go too.
The undersized defender was one of the draft’s best skaters, but it wasn’t enough for NHL teams. He’ll need to take his offensive game to another level. Would be great to see him in the CHL next year.
Ustinkov started the year as a potential first round candidate and ended up not being selected. Concerns over his processing ability ultimately scared off teams. Does he come over to London next year to try to turn his career around?
Again, this one feels like a misstep. Yes, he’s small. Yes, there are strength concerns. But he’s ultra talented. Few players available in the 7th round would have had the upside of Zetterberg.
Our aggressive ranking of Roed came mostly from me, as he was a player I was very impressed with at the USHL and high school levels. I liked the competitive drive in his game. Next year’s Joe Connor?
He just couldn’t recover from his poor second half. If he can put together a more consistent season next year, he’ll be back on the draft radar.
This one is shocking to me. Loved the aggressive and tenacious approach. Had a terrific WJAC. Here’s hoping that he goes somewhere next year (USHL, NCAA) where he can show that he should have been selected.
I get it. He’s an undersized stay at home type. But this young man is just such a smart defensive player. He competes hard and he’s going to get better at the offensive end too.
A breakout performer at the U18’s with Switzerland, we figured someone would take Meier given the flashes he showed this year as a two-way defender.
]]>
For those unfamiliar, North American players with birth dates from January 1st to September 15th, will be eligible for three NHL drafts. Players with birth dates from September 16th to December 31st, will be eligible for two NHL drafts. And for European players (in European leagues), extend that eligibility by one year in both cases. In the last decade, NHL scouts have increased the rate with which they are selecting “re-entry” candidates, or players previously passed over. Contract limits have made it critical for teams to spread out where they select players from, in addition to their age. This has made second- and third-year eligible U.S. and European based players especially attractive. However, these players have had a lot of success in recent years too. Look around the league and you see these players everywhere. For example, Calgary Flames standout defender Mackenzie Weegar was one. Ottawa Senators standout forward Drake Batherson was one. So too was Winnipeg Jets starter Connor Hellebuyck. Pyotr Kochetkov, one of the top young netminders in the NHL was also one.
Last year, eight “re-entry” candidates went in the Top 110; Adam Gajan, Yegor Sidorov, Vadim Moroz, Florian Xhekaj, Cole Knuble, Patrick Thomas, Ty Mueller, and Bogdan Konyushkov. In our “second chances” article last year (Part 1): (Part 2): (Part 3): We wrote about five of those eight. In total there were 40 taken, right around the trend of other recent drafts (roughly about 20% of all players selected). Additionally, of those 40, we identified and wrote about 28 (well over half of them) in our aforementioned second chances series. Just like in previous editions of this annual report, we aim to identify more.
In 2024, we have some very interesting candidates. Maybe not at the level of Adam Gajan, who was nearly a first-round pick, but there are definitely a few players who could…and should go inside the Top 100. Finland’s Jesse Pulkkinen seems like the top candidate to go first among this group and has had a terrific year offensively. Tri-City netminder Lukas Matecha has been terrific in the WHL as an Import and played in this year’s CHL Top Prospect’s Game. North Bay’s Anthony Romani has been among the leaders in OHL scoring all season. This article intends to highlight them and many other candidates who could be part of that 20% this year.
This is part two of the series, putting the spotlight on those re-entries available from leagues based out of the United States.
USHL

Burnevik was in my opinion a surprise to be passed up at the 2023 NHL Draft last year. It may have been due to the fact that Burnevik was demoted to the U17 team towards the end of the year and left off the IIHF U18 roster, but the tools were there for him to still be selected. Quiet offensively for a stacked NTDP team last year, posting 19 points in 43 games, Burnevik has found his scoring touch with the Madison Capitols in the USHL this year where he leads the team in points (59) and goals (36) as of this writing. He is a large-bodied forward, standing 6-foot-4 and weighing in at 201 pounds. These types of players take more time to develop as they grow into their bodies, and we are seeing this trend with Burnevik. The St. Cloud commit has an NHL-caliber shot to go along with some decent vision and passing in his repertoire. The only concern with Burnevik’s development at this point is his skating, but with some growth and strength conditioning, he may be able to overcome that deficiency and make the next jump, especially when he begins to play at the NCAA level next season. There’s a pretty good chance a team will take a chance on him at this year’s draft. (Mark Dube)
Shahan has taken a big leap forward in his development this season while playing in Sioux City of the USHL. He currently sits second in goals (35) in the entire league and has amassed 49 points in 46 games in his second season. Shahan is currently ranked as a fifth-round projection according to the NHL Central Scouting Midterm list. He is committed to the University of Connecticut next season which should help with his progression and development, playing at a higher level against older players. Shahan possesses a great motor and is always engaging on the forecheck and works hard along the boards and is not afraid to get physical, all traits that are translatable at the NHL level, in a bottom-six checking type role. The fact that he has elevated his offensive output and demonstrated some scoring touch bodes well for a potential re-entry selection at the 2024 NHL Draft. (Mark Dube)
Cerrato re-enters the NHL draft after being part of the U18 NTDP team last season where he played a limited role and ultimately ended the season skating with the U17 crew (like the aforementioned Burnevik). He brings tenacity and a willingness to challenge players along the boards and in front of the net, but his skill set is still somewhat limited at this point, even if he is seeing some offensive success with the Youngstown Phantoms in the USHL this season. Cerrato currently has 42 points in 35 games played and is committed to Penn State University next year where he will continue his development. He is ranked in the seventh round on the NHL Central Scouting Midterm list. (Mark Dube)
After spending his draft campaign playing U18 AAA hockey at Mount St. Charles Academy, Montgomery moved to the USHL for a season of preparation before he heads off to the University of Maine in the fall. While his production at Mount St. Charles (33 points in 52 games) made him a long shot to be selected in the 2023 class (he ultimately went undrafted) it’s the immense progress he’s shown in his time with USHL Lincoln that makes him a candidate to hear his name called at this summer’s draft. The core appeal of Montgomery as a prospect is his tools. The left winger stands six-foot-four and still has room to fill into that frame as he’s listed at just 175 pounds by the Stars. Montgomery’s skating is pretty good for someone his size, and he can be quite a lot to handle when he’s charging full steam ahead on the rush. His reach creates turnovers all over the ice and has been the catalyst for many a rush chance this season. For someone his size, Montgomery has quality puck skills. He’s not an out-of-this-world dangler, but he’s definitely capable of putting a highlight together here and there. That’s certainly the type of game he appears to want to play, and he’s done so with some success in the USHL. Montgomery’s tools have started to come together on a more consistent basis, and he’s been arguably the Stars’ best player this season. While there’s still a long runway ahead of him, Montgomery is an interesting prospect for a team to draft and then track as he develops at the University of Wisconsin. (Ethan Hetu)
A dominant high school player in his first year of draft eligibility, Fisher did not hear his name called in the 2023 draft in large part due to questions over how his game might translate at a higher level of hockey. It’s likely that teams were most likely looking to see how he’d fare playing against tougher competition in the USHL before deciding whether to invest a draft pick in him. In his draft year, Fisher’s limited USHL exposure didn’t exactly go well, as he played sparingly, didn’t make much of an impact when he did play, and Fargo won only four of twelve games with him in their lineup. This season, though, Fisher has found his way in the USHL. He’s at the moment slotted in as the Force’s second-line center (behind high-flying Penguins prospect Zam Plante) and is scoring at around a point-per-game rate. With a college career playing at the University of Denver on the horizon, Fisher could very well hear his name called at the 2024 draft by teams looking to see what one of the best coaches in college hockey (Denver’s David Carle) can do with him. Standing 6’2, 192 lbs, the main point of progress Fisher has made in morphing himself into a draft-able prospect is his physical development. He’s far better suited at the moment to survive the rigors of USHL hockey than he was a year ago, and it’s evident when comparing his shifts for Fargo last season compared to this year. He no longer looks overwhelmed and as a result is in a better position to show off his standout offensive tool, which is widely held to be his shot. Fisher is a player with whom it isn’t exactly difficult to imagine an NHL future. He works hard, brings some offense, and has all the physical tools teams look for. The question Fisher will need to answer is if he has enough dynamic quality, efficiency, or versatility to his game to be more than just an elite junior (and potentially NCAA) player. (Ethan Hetu)
Although the presence of two top USHL products for the 2024 draft (Sacha Boisvert and Matvei Gridin) has drawn most of the attention among Muskegon Lumberjacks, Joe Connor’s progress is notable and has made him a prospect worthy of consideration for the 2024 draft. Like Fisher, the Avon Old Farms product only played in 12 USHL games last season, though he did keep his head above water to a degree Fisher was unable to manage. This season, Connor has emerged as one of Muskegon’s most reliable offensive producers outside of the big two in Gridin and Boisvert. While Connor was prolific playing high school hockey and wowed scouts with his work ethic and exceptional energy level, he simply was not playing against strong enough competition to confidently project how his game might translate at the pro level. Now with a full USHL campaign under his belt, Connor has put together a body of work that suggests a pro future is very much in the cards. Connor was a well-liked but ultimately undrafted prospect last season in large part due to his motor. This season, it’s how Connor has learned to better manage his motor that’s been the most significant improvement. Connor has shown the ability to moderate his energy level in order to provide more nuance and deceptive potential to his game. He’s no longer running at top speed all the time, and his ability to utilize his teammates to create offense has improved as a result. That core tool still remains, and it’s one that will carry him to Northeastern in the fall. The lack of high-end skill or true deceptive elements in Connor’s game likely means he doesn’t have a high-end ceiling at the pro level, but the easy-to-appreciate aspects of Connor’s profile such as his work rate and skating gives him legitimate potential to be a role player in the pros. (Ethan Hetu)
While Poitras certainly had a solid USHL rookie season, his 37-point performance was not enough for him to hear his name called. As a five-foot-eleven forward with average-to-below-average physical tools, Poitras simply did not possess the kind of profile NHL teams are looking to invest in with their limited number of draft picks. Now with another season of USHL hockey under his belt, Poitras stands a better chance of hearing his name called at the 2024 draft, though his fate there is still very much up in the air. Poitras is a good skater, but not an elite one. He’s got enough zip to be an asset off the puck on the forecheck and hustling back in transition, and his speed is certainly something to build off of. Poitras also has a decent skill level, and the combination of those puck skills with his skating allows him to create a decent number of relatively clean carry-in zone entries for his team. That being said, his approach to offense can be very straightforward at times. While he works hard and has produced effectively this season, his game lacks the kind of deceptive elements that lead to offense at higher levels. It’s certainly something he can work on, but at the moment it’s hard to have a ton of confidence that he’ll pile up points against more difficult competition. Still, his skating, work rate, and basic skill level are enough to make him worth considering for the 2024 draft, especially since he’ll be at Northeastern next season which could be a strong place for him to continue his development. (Ethan Hetu)
Blais-Savoie’s statline certainly doesn’t stand out to the point where you’d assume he was a serious draft candidate. However, offense isn’t his game. He’s a lockdown, stay at home defender who is unquestionably one of the best defensive players in the USHL. This was also evident at the World Junior A Challenge, where he was named a tournament all star despite barely hitting the scoresheet. The issue is that Blais-Savoie doesn’t have the size/reach that you like to see from your typical stay at home types in the NHL; he’s a non-traditional defensive stalwart. However, with excellent mobility and strong defensive instincts, it’s clear that Blais-Savoie doesn’t need to be hulking to be highly effective at the junior level. Colorado College has rapidly turned into a premier program again under Kris Mayotte and scouts are bound to love that destination for Blais-Savoie. It wouldn’t shock me at all if he were a late round selection by a team who believes that his safe puck play and defensive acumen could make him a Zach Whitecloud type. (Brock Otten)
Not a dynamic player, but Gardula has been extremely effective for Sioux City this year in his first full season out of Cushing Academy. He builds in deception well by varying his pace and altering his approach offensively, reacting to what the defense gives him. More slippery than quick, Gardula is confident on his edges and can shake coverage by quickly pivoting or shifting his direction; utilizing stops and starts while maintaining possession. Gardula is also an active forechecker who plays a physical game, consistently applying pressure in retrieval opportunities. A high IQ player, NHL scouts are bound to hesitate regarding Gardula because the physical tools are currently lacking. There’s a need to improve his explosiveness and quickness, and with average size and skill, questions regarding his projection are realistic. A UConn commit, NHL teams may take a wait and see approach. (Brock Otten)
Pahlsson was ranked last year by us as a re-entry after a terrific season in the Swedish J20 league, but he ultimately went unselected. NHL scouts would be silly to make that mistake again after Pahlsson has been one of the best players in the USHL this year with Dubuque. The University of Minnesota commit’s pace of play may concern NHL scouts; he prefers to slow the game down and is at his best working East/West, versus North/South, however his vision, skill, and offensive zone anticipation are all impressive. He shows good speed in bursts and will use this to escape pressure initially, but his top speed would be classified as only average. Even though he’s an older draft prospect, he’s likely a longer term project still because there’s a need to add strength and improve his physical play in order to succeed at the higher levels with the way he likes to play. However, after three or four years at Minnesota, Pahlsson could be an excellent complementary offensive piece. (Brock Otten)
One of the leading scorers in the USHL this year, Sondreal is a Boston College commit. He’s transformed himself from being a high energy, two-way support player to a go-to offensive player for Dubuque. His game is still fueled by his tenacious approach and speed, but he’s found a niche as a terrific offensive support player who gets himself in good scoring position and who shows good vision with the puck in transition and coming off the cycle. He’s not an overtly creative player with the puck and he’s probably best suited for the wing at the next level, but his game is tailored nicely to a middle six role at the pro level if he continues to develop. (Brock Otten)
We ranked Thoreson 209th last year after a strong season split between the USHL and Minnesota High School hockey with Andover High. We liked his combination of competitiveness and skill, but worried about his lack of dynamic stride given his lack of size. Playing a full year in the USHL, it’s obvious that Thoreson has put in the work to improve his athleticism. He’s still not the most dynamic skater, but he’s more confident on his edges and has gained a step to make him more consistently dangerous on the counter attack. He’s still an impressive playmaker who can thread the needle, which in combination with his great work ethic and puck protection skills, make him one of the USHL’s premier set-up men. However, I’d put him as a draft long shot still, because of the same projection concerns teams would have likely had last year. (Brock Otten)
One of the most improved players in the USHL this year, Powell has been one of the USHL’s leading scorers in the second half of the season, emerging as an offensive juggernaut. The 6’0, 200lb power forward and Ohio State commit has learned how to leverage his size and skill advantage to become a dominant force at the junior level. He’s not the prettiest skater, but he builds up sufficient speed to play his North/South game. He’s extremely active in puck pursuit and he has great off puck instincts to help force turnovers, both with his stick and his body through heavy hits. Perhaps what has impressed me most this year is how strong his playmaking ability coming off the wall has been. He wins those battles, forces those turnovers, but is then able to quickly assess the ice in front of him to set up scoring chances. When he’s not looking to set up plays from behind the net or the half wall, he’s getting to the net front and has a clear understanding of how to be an effective power player. At this point, given his rapid progression, NHL teams would be silly to pass on him at this year’s NHL draft. (Brock Otten)
A former highly touted player coming out of the New York area (and prep school scene), Nicholas’ first USHL season and initial NHL draft year did not go according to plan last year. He struggled with the adjustment and found himself buried in the Sioux City lineup. This year has been a different story. He finds himself just outside the top ten of assists in the entire USHL and Nicholas has been an offensive catalyst for Sioux City. The former Michigan, now Brown commit (he flipped his commitment early in the calendar year) has worked hard to improve his skating and that added extra speed has made him a more difficult cover in transition, especially when you factor in his strong puck protection skill. Nicholas is excellent in close quarters and does his best work in high traffic areas, utilizing his quick hands and strength on the puck to extend plays. If he could just find another level physically to improve his two-way outlook, many of his tendencies and skills could make him a solid pro. NHL scouts are sure to be familiar with Nicholas previously and it’s likely more than a few have been impressed by his improvement this season. (Brock Otten)
Even if he has struggled a bit lately, Gadzhiev has done enough in a limited sample size this season to impress scouts. He came to Muskegon from the Slovak second league at the start of the calendar year and has emerged as the team’s starting netminder. He only has average size, but he’s clearly a strong athlete with the ability to cover post to post quickly and get in and out of the butterfly efficiently. He challenges shooters well and has a lot of potential technically because of his athleticism. He’s struggled a bit with his rebound control and positioning in the last little bit and teams have made adjustments on him, but his overall body of work has been solid enough. Where he goes from here remains to be seen (especially as a 2004 born). He could play in the USHL as an OA next year and try to search for an NCAA scholarship (if he’s deemed eligible despite playing in the Slovak second league). Depending on NHL interest, the avenues for his development are pretty vast. (Brock Otten)
NCAA

As a five-foot-eight blueliner, Vinny Borgesi was always going to face an uphill battle in terms of getting drafted by an NHL club. While his work in the USHL was solid (38pts in 57 GP with Tri-City in his draft campaign) he didn’t put forth an overwhelming, undeniably impressive statistical case to be drafted. He ultimately didn’t hear his name called at the 2022 draft in Montreal, nor was he selected in Nashville for the 2023 draft after his freshman season at Northeastern. Now, in the midst of a significantly improved year two with the Huskies, Borgesi has his last and best chance of being selected in an NHL draft. In some ways, Borgesi is the same defenseman he was in the USHL. He remains a confident, aggressive blueliner who always seeks to activate and involve himself in the play. He’s still a strong skater (both in terms of stop-start ability/work on his edges and straight-line speed) with quality puck skills and strong vision. But now that he has significant college experience under his belt, he’s become a far more well-rounded player and a stronger pro prospect. He’s added more deception to his game, and he’s more efficient in his approach to creating offense from the blueline. One of his favorite things to do is utilize his skating to dart into open space in the offensive zone, drawing the attention of opponents and thereby creating space/separation for teammates. That’s led to quite a few assists this season. Borgesi is now the Huskies’ most relied-upon defenseman and is driving far better results than he did a year ago when he sometimes looked overwhelmed as a freshman. Borgesi averages more minutes per game than any other Huskies player, and with the box score numbers to back up his very real on-ice improvements, the smooth-skating undersized blueliner could be an intriguing late-round option for an NHL team looking for a player a bit closer to being pro-ready. (Ethan Hetu)
As one of the younger players who were eligible to be drafted for the first time in 2023, it shouldn’t come as a massive surprise that Adams went undrafted last season but now looks to be a near-lock to become a 2024 selection. He was solid across two seasons in the USHL with the Tri-City Storm, if not at all spectacular. But it’s his early performances as a first-year player for the Friars that have really caught scouts’ attention. Adams won’t turn 19 until early September and has been one of the more effective forwards at Providence this season despite his relative inexperience. A well-rounded, detailed player, Adams has a commitment to bringing value on both ends of the ice. On defense, he’s a hard-working player who leverages a strong motor and quality defensive instincts to help kill chances and transition the puck to the neutral and offensive zones. On offense, Adams has decent puck skills and a functional shot, though he doesn’t have separating talent in any one offensive area. He’s a smart player who knows how to make an impact on the game, and he’s far from a perimeter player. But his offensive game can lack deception at times, and there are moments where one would like to see his understanding of timing and spacing relative to his teammates in the offensive zone improve. There’s a lot to work with here given Adams is such a versatile, hard-working player. But there may not be the kind of tools to write home about that would warrant spending a draft pick on Adams earlier than the middle rounds. (Ethan Hetu)
The second Hryckowian brother to play at Northeastern University, Dylan Hryckowian is in the midst of an impressive freshman campaign. Despite scoring at a solid clip for the Cedar Rapids RoughRiders in the USHL last year, Hryckowian did not hear his name called at the 2023 draft. Now it’s his work as a freshman with the Huskies that gives him a solid chance to be selected at the 2024 process. The name of the game for Hryckowian is speed and work rate. He’s a lot to handle as the F1 on the forecheck, and he can be highly disruptive. That carries over to his work in his own zone, where he’s a plus contributor defensively and an asset in helping transition pucks up the ice. Offensively, Hryckowian is more of a mixed bag. He’s an intelligent player, and one can certainly appreciate the details of his game. He has a solid understanding of how offense is created, and his work off the puck is very polished. But in terms of his actual skill level when the puck is on his stick, he’s missing the kind of separating skill that most scorers at the pro level have. He has a decent shot and his puck skills are far from a liability at the NCAA level, but when he transitions to the pro game he could very well have trouble creating time and space with the puck on his stick unless he relies on his skating exclusively. Given those questions as to how his offense might transition to the pro game, Hryckowian isn’t likely to be selected as high as his strong college production (23 points in 29 games at the time of writing) might suggest. But his high-end skating, high-energy style, and refined understanding of how to contribute offensively away from the puck make him a solid candidate to be a late-round draft selection. (Ethan Hetu)
Although Patrick Geary does not have the sort of statistical profile that merits an NHL draft selection, looking at just his box score numbers either from this season at Michigan State (28 GP 11pts) or last year with USHL Waterloo (60 GP 13pts) would not do justice to how effective a player Geary is. He’s a throwback stay-at-home defenseman, a steady, reliable blueliner who can limit the likelihood of his team surrendering a goal whenever he hops over the boards while also bringing an imposing physical element. Geary was a fast-rising player at Waterloo, and although his offensive numbers actually declined year-over-year in the USHL, it’s hard to argue he wasn’t a significantly improved player in his sophomore campaign there. Now as a first-year player on a top NCAA program, Geary has not played as big of a role but has been similarly effective as a defense-first defenseman who plays with an edge. In his final year of draft eligibility, Geary has shown he can excel defensively against stiff NCAA competition. He’s certainly made strides in other aspects of his game, though those areas are still a work in progress. It’s possible an NHL team decides to invest a draft pick in Geary this summer in order to be in a position to reap the benefits of Geary’s continued development as an all-around player, hoping that at the very least he offers the basic upside of a strong defensive defenseman. (Ethan Hetu)
One of the top scoring freshmen in college hockey this year, Gordon is operating near the point per game mark for the Huskies. He has a lot going for him as a complementary winger. His release is terrific, and he has shown an ability to score in a variety of different ways this season. He’s one of those players who hunts open ice well and always is in a strong shooting position with his stick on the ice, ready for the one timer; he doesn’t need much room to operate. He also operates well as an F1 and invites and initiates contact to make a play, making him an excellent boards player. He’s intelligent, energetic, and he has enough offensive talent to be a goal scorer at the next level. Really the only thing missing from his game is high end skating ability, which is obviously cause for concern. However, you simply can’t argue with the success he’s had this year as Michigan Tech’s leading scorer. (Brock Otten)
On a team with several NHL draft picks (and a few future ones), O’Connell has fit right in as a freshman, sitting tied for second on the team in goals (as of writing this). He’s not driving the bus, but he’s certainly helping to navigate it. He plays a really honest North/South game and has worked hard to improve his skating from last year, which has made him a more effective player on and off the puck. Equal parts playmaker and goal scorer, O’Connell is a chameleon who does what is needed depending on what the situation calls for. He shows well as a goal scorer in tight with soft hands, but he’s probably at his best putting defenders on his back driving wide or working the wall. It’s cliche, but O’Connell plays a very pro style game, built around attacking traffic, protecting the puck, and making quick decisions. Based on his development and play this year, he should very much be on the draft radar of many teams. (Brock Otten)
Part of a very strong freshmen class for the Big Red, Robertson has had an immediate impact, playing well over 20 minutes per night on a lot of occasions. On a blueline with three NHL drafted players, Robertson has been the most effective of that group and it should bode well for his chances of being selected this year in his final year of eligibility. He doesn’t have the most efficient linear stride, but he’s quite mobile and confident on his edges, part of what makes him such a competent powerplay quarterback. He’s playing with a ton of confidence offensively despite being a freshman and is constantly looking to attack by carrying up ice into the offensive zone. Defensively, he’s been better than expected and has fit into Cornell’s system really well. Being only 5’11, there will be question marks regarding his ability to defend at the pro level. There will also be question marks surrounding whether he’s creative or innately skilled enough to be a powerplay quarterback at the pro level. However, as a heads up puck mover who gets pucks through and who can use his mobility to his advantage in all three ones, Robertson has value. (Brock Otten)
Got confirmation that standout freshman netminder for Maine, Albin Boija, is indeed eligible for the 2024 NHL Draft, despite turning 21 this year while playing in NA. Same reasoning Lucas Edmonds and Andrei Buyalsky were eligible previously. Boija has come in and stolen the starter’s job away from senior and fellow Swede Victor Ostman, posting some of the most impressive numbers in the NCAA. Boija is only average sized at 6’1, but he’s very technically sound. He is ultra-aggressive in counting down angles and lives at the edge of the blue paint. His movements are calculated to ensure that he’s covering his angles, and his rebound control is quite refined. While his pads are quick and he competes hard to make second chance saves, there’s going to be a need for him to improve his lower body strength to get quicker post to post. At times he has to take a secondary push to go post to post and might not be as quick as NHL scouts might like given his average size. However, you can’t argue with his success this year and the upside he might possess. (Brock Otten)
We ranked Peck pretty aggressively last year (106th) after a terrific season with Avon Old Farms in the prep circuit, but he ended up going unselected. This year, Peck has taken his talents to the NAHL with Bismarck and his strong season has put himself back on the scouting map as a re-entry. What’s most impressive about Peck’s year is that he’s improved considerably since the start of the season. Things didn’t start great for him, but he’s been nearly unbeatable the last few months. The University of Michigan commit even got a cup of coffee in the USHL with Muskegon, winning his only appearance. Peck remains a calming presence in the crease because of his play tracking ability, strong positioning, and excellent rebound control. He limits second chance opportunities and always seems to be in great position to make the initial save when play moves North/South. However, it doesn’t appear that his quickness/agility has improved from last year and until that happens, his upside as a pro will be limited. He’s still susceptible to being caught out of position when the play moves quickly East/West and he struggles to get in and out of the butterfly to make second chance saves when needed, or when he has to react to a redirect or blocked shot. IMO, athleticism can be improved. And this is why I’d still advocate for Peck to be selected this year. He has a chance to be a long-term starter as part of a great program in Michigan (with Barczewski graduating and Peck/Korpi coming in) and he’s going to get the off ice development needed to improve the weaker points of his game. (Brock Otten)
]]>The million-dollar question is…are we still playing catch-up as a scouting community following the resumption of play post pandemic? Last year, this was definitely the case as leagues returned to full seasons. But are certain players still growing exponentially as they try to recover lost development time? This is particularly true of players in the CHL and in Europe, where most junior leagues halted.
For those unfamiliar, North American players with birth dates from January 1st to September 15th, will be eligible for three NHL drafts. Players with birth dates from September 16th to December 31st will be eligible for two NHL drafts. And for European players (in European leagues), extend that eligibility by one year in both cases. Recently, NHL scouts have increased the rate with which they are selecting “re-entry” candidates, or players previously passed over. Contract limits have made it critical for teams to spread out where they select players from, in addition to their age. This has made second- and third-year eligible U.S. and European based players especially attractive. However, these players have had a lot of success in recent years too. Look around the league and you will see these players everywhere. For example, Calgary Flames standout defender Mackenzie Weegar was one. Ottawa Senators standout forward Drake Batherson was one. So too were Winnipeg Jets starter Connor Hellebuyck and Tampa Bay Lightning rookie defender Nick Perbix.
Last year, four “re-entry” candidates went in the Top 100; Dmitri Buchelnikov, Lucas Edmonds, Mikey Milne, and Aidan Thompson. In total there were 42 taken, right around the trend of other recent drafts (roughly about 20% of all players selected). Let’s take a look at our ten highest ranked “re-entry” players for 2023, in addition to some comments from our scouting staff.

Spending most of his year of first draft eligibility in Slovakia’s junior circuit, Gajan didn’t exactly have the brightest stage to show off what he could do. He finally got exactly that at the World Juniors, where he stole the show for Slovakia, posting a .936 save percentage in four games, winning the award for Best Goaltender. He had officially announced his commitment to Minnesota-Duluth earlier that month and has slowly raised his standing to the point where it seems highly unlikely that he won’t hear his name called at this next NHL draft. Gajan offers the size teams covet from their goalies and moves surprisingly well for someone that big. He’s confident in his net, able to square up to shooters and challenge them. While it was admittedly a small sample of games, the World Juniors showed that Gajan was able to take a significant moment and rise up to it, which is an important aspect of the mental side of goaltending. There’s still so much development that needs to happen here before his pro future is even a consideration, but he’ll thankfully have a long runway to work with in the NCAA. Teams are always in need of an infusion of talent to their goaltending pipeline, so at this point, it would be quite a surprise for Gajan to go undrafted once again, even though he spent most of this season in the NAHL rather than the USHL. (Ethan Hetu)
Hanzel has always been a toolsy blueliner with a lot of long-term upside, thanks to a rangy, fluid skating style, the ability to handle the puck well at full speed, and a frame that has room left to fill in. The problem has been him knowing how to maximize his tools and put everything together effectively and consistently. Perhaps playing on a Thunderbirds team with an embarrassment of riches prospect-wise has rubbed off on him, as his game has taken major strides from last season to this one. One of the biggest signs of his growth was how he played while talented teammate Kevin Korchinski was off at the World Juniors for a month, taking the larger slice of the pie with aplomb and producing 10 points in 11 games. It's also worth mentioning that the vast majority of his offense this season has come at even strength, as he doesn't get much cushy powerplay time. There's a lot to like about Hanzel, and even better, there's likely even more upside still that hasn't been tapped into yet. (Derek Neumeier)
In his final year of draft eligibility, the last calendar year has been a whirlwind for Jatkola. It started this summer at the make-up WJC’s, where he stole the Finnish starter’s role from Ottawa prospect Leevi Merilainen. It then carried over to Liiga, where Jatkola became a dependable starter at the age of 20 (he turns 21 later this September). Jatkola relies on his quickness and athleticism because he doesn’t have a massive frame (listed at 6 '1). His improvement over the last few years has been phenomenal and as long as he continues to be aggressive in the crease, he could have a bright future. (Brock Otten)
A top ten scorer in the WHL for half the year, Roest ended up finishing just outside the Top 20. Everett started the season without many of their top forwards from last year and eventually decided to become sellers before the trade deadline, creating an opening for others on the team to step up, and the son of former NHLer Stacy Roest thrived with the newfound opportunity. He's a well-rounded center who is making notable progress in a number of areas, including skating, finishing, playmaking, off-puck play and faceoffs. His offensive game doesn't quite pop as much as his scoring totals might suggest, but he plays a very mature, fleshed-out game that makes a positive difference in a variety of ways. If he can continue going down this path he'll keep increasing his odds of eventually carving out an NHL job as a plug-and-play forward, which are always useful to have on a roster. (Derek Neumeier)
Last season was the debut season in the MHL for center Yegor Vinogradov and he played well, but considering his age, it was not especially impressive, so it wasn’t exactly a surprise that he went undrafted. This season, much due to his versatility, he made the Torpedo KHL roster right from the start, which is unusual for a young player, considering that he was trusted with a full-time role. Vinogradov did well in that role due to his combination of size, motor and skill. He’s a hard worker who plays a 200-foot game and he understands how to use his size to his advantage by driving the net to look for scoring opportunities. Upon being sent down to the MHL later in the year, Vinogradov showed that he can be an offensive leader too, as his contribution was a major reason for his team’s MHL championship victory. If he can translate that to the pro level too, the end result might be really interesting. (Viktor Fomich)
The appeal of Sidorov as a prospect is almost comically straightforward: he's really, really good at scoring goals, and does it with incredible frequency. He's certainly not a Connor Bedard level goal-scorer (nobody in the WHL is, or might ever be again), but he's nevertheless one of the best in the league, finishing with 40 this season, following up his 23 tallies in 58 matches last year. And this is in spite of playing on a Blades team that isn't exactly great at setting him up for easy finishes. Give him the slightest bit of time and space to get a clean look and lean into his stick and the puck is almost always finding twine. He's also excellent in the preceding couple of seconds, dusting or dragging the puck into the precise shooting spot he likes. The big question is whether or not he'll ever get quick enough to adjust to the NHL level, where such time and space are rare luxuries, especially since everything else about his game is lacklustre — if he's not scoring, he's not contributing much. Still, a player like Sidorov is absolutely worth the gamble with a mid to late-round pick. (Derek Neumeier)
A classic late bloomer, Hellnemo has emerged as one of the top young goaltenders in Sweden a year after being passed over at the draft following a disappointing year at the J20 and J18 levels. He won five games in the SHL as a U19 player and was arguably one of the best goalies at the J20 level when he played there (if you ignore his disappointing playoff performance). Hellnemo is a pure stopper. His movements are very refined for a young netminder, and he’s got a great glove hand that helps him protect the upper portion of the net. Rebound control is a bit of an issue at this current time, but with his play tracking ability, he has the potential to be a netminder across the pond. (Brock Otten)
After a relatively impressive rookie season in the USHL where he was instantly one of Fargo’s top performers, it was somewhat surprising that Knuble didn’t hear his name called at the 2022 NHL draft. On paper, it feels as though a player of Knuble’s production profile who also brings the NHL bloodlines would be valued (his father, Mike, played over 1,000 NHL games for six prominent franchises). The main drawback with Knuble lies in his feet. He may not be a bad skater on his edges, but he doesn’t have the speed you’d like to see from someone of his size profile whatsoever. His main calling card is a strong commitment to two-way hockey combined with some strong offensive tools. He has a quality set of hands that are a major help to his offensive toolset, and it will be interesting to see how he adjusts to playing in the NCAA at Notre Dame, where he’s less likely to be so heavily relied upon as an offensive generator. After a dominating performance at the World Junior A Challenge and a strong year in the USHL (top ten in scoring), one would think he hears his name called the second time around, but he needs to improve his skating for him to have similar success at more challenging levels of hockey. (Ethan Hetu)
The third leading scorer in the Swedish J20 league this year, Pahlsson finished with a better or equal points per game average than many NHL drafted players. An intelligent and crafty pivot, Pahlsson is an extremely well-rounded offensive player who consistently makes his linemates better. His edgework and agility are good, making him elusive, however there could be a need for him to improve his quickness to be an impactful pro in Sweden or across the pond. Regardless, given his high-end skill and offensive potential, it would be shocking to see him go unselected a second time around. (Brock Otten)
After scoring just 18 points in 61 games last season, it was no surprise that Pohlkamp ultimately went undrafted in his first year of eligibility. The USHL proved to be a decently steep challenge, but this season all he did was rise to the occasion. Pohlkamp’s points production exploded, as he led the USHL in scoring by a defenseman and took home the league’s top defenseman award. There are nights when he looks like an entirely different player from the one that often struggled as a USHL rookie. He plays with quiet confidence from the back end, and he has all the tools to make an impact on both ends of the ice. He’s not the tallest, but he’s well filled out for the 5-10 frame he possesses. He’s a solid skater who does a good job at facilitating zone exits and moving his team up the ice, and when he’s in the offensive zone he’s smart about making his reads and choosing when to play aggressively. Pohlkamp is also armed with a massive point shot and has a desire to play aggressively defensively. A late addition to the U.S.’ World Junior A Challenge team, he ended up as one of the top defenders in the tournament. He's headed to Bemidji State next season and would be an intriguing player for a team to select and then track over the course of his collegiate career. (Ethan Hetu)
]]>
It’s that time! The McKeen’s scouting staff has finalized our final rankings for the 2023 NHL Draft ahead of the release of our draft guide in a few weeks. As per usual, our list runs 224 players deep to match the number of selections in the draft, but we have included over 300 players when you include our Honorable Mentions.
Much to the surprise of no one, Connor Bedard remains our top ranked player, as he has been all season long. In fact, our top three remains unchanged from our midseason rankings with Adam Fantilli and Leo Carlsson holding down the second and third spots, respectively. There has been one change in our top five with Will Smith leapfrogging Matvei Michkov into the fourth position following his dominant second half and U18’s.
Russian defender Dmitry Simashev remains our top ranked blueliner but has now moved into the top ten. His combination of size, mobility, physicality, and improving offensive skill set is going to be alluring to NHL teams and we feel that his upside is the highest in a weaker crop for defenders.
A trio of Swedish players are among our biggest risers from our midseason list, with Tom Willander, Anton Wahlberg, and David Edstrom all jumping up into the first round. All three were excellent in the second half of the season, which culminated with strong performances at the U18’s. Willander, in particular, has a huge fan in our Director of Scouting, Brock Otten. “If you were to ask me who my favourite defender in the draft class is, I’d probably say Willander. He rarely makes a poor play and I believe that we are underappreciating his potential as an NHL defender because of how efficient and safe his game can be. I would be shocked if he does not become a quality second pairing guy at the NHL level and I don’t think the other defenders ranked in the first have that same assurance,” said Otten.
Another massive jumper in our list is Hamilton Bulldogs winger Nick Lardis. 98th on our midseason list, Lardis now finds himself ranked just inside of our first round. His play with Hamilton, following a trade from Peterborough has vaulted him up draft boards, including ours. His combination of quickness and scoring ability gives him a solid projection at the NHL level.
Despite having two goaltenders inside of our first round at midseason (Carson Bjarnason and Michael Hrabal), we ended the year with none. Trey Augustine is now our top ranked netminder, ranked in the mid second round. However, Augustine, Bjarnason, Hrabal, and USHL Clark Cup MVP Jacob Fowler are all closely ranked in that range.
Look for the release of our 2023 Draft Guide in the next couple weeks. It will include all of our rankings and reports, a mock draft, a preview of the 2024 NHL Draft, and much more.
As a subscriber, link to our full ranking with links to the player pages here - McKeen's Draft Rankings - You can download the ranking as an excel file as well.
| RANK | PLAYER | POS | HT/WT | DOB | NATION | TEAM | GP-G-A-PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Connor Bedard | C | 5-10/185 | 17-Jul-05 | Canada | Regina (WHL) | 57-71-72-143 |
| 2 | Adam Fantilli | C | 6-2/195 | 12-Oct-04 | Canada | Michigan (B1G) | 36-30-35-65 |
| 3 | Leo Carlsson | C | 6-3/200 | 26-Dec-04 | Sweden | Orebro (SHL) | 44-10-15-25 |
| 4 | Will Smith | C | 6-0/175 | 17-Mar-05 | USA | USN U18 (USDP) | 59-51-75-126 |
| 5 | Matvei Michkov | RW | 5-10/170 | 9-Dec-04 | Russia | SKA St. Petersburg-HK Sochi (KHL) | 30-9-11-20 |
| 6 | Zach Benson | LW | 5-9/160 | 12-May-05 | Canada | Winnipeg (WHL) | 60-36-62-98 |
| 7 | Dalibor Dvorsky | C | 6-1/200 | 15-Jun-05 | Slovakia | AIK (HockeyAllsvenskan) | 38-6-8-14 |
| 8 | Ryan Leonard | RW | 5-11/190 | 21-Jan-05 | USA | USN U18 (USDP) | 56-50-43-93 |
| 9 | Dmitri Simashev | D | 6-4/200 | 4-Feb-05 | Russia | Loko Yaroslavl-Loko-76 Yaroslavl (MHL) | 33-1-11-12 |
| 10 | Matthew Wood | RW | 6-3/195 | 6-Feb-05 | Canada | Connecticut (HE) | 35-11-23-34 |
| 11 | Oliver Moore | C | 5-11/185 | 22-Jan-05 | USA | USN U18 (USDP) | 60-31-43-74 |
| 12 | Colby Barlow | LW | 6-0/195 | 14-Feb-05 | Canada | Owen Sound (OHL) | 59-46-33-79 |
| 13 | Nate Danielson | C | 6-1/185 | 27-Sep-04 | Canada | Brandon (WHL) | 68-33-45-78 |
| 14 | Axel Sandin Pellikka | D | 5-11/180 | 11-Mar-05 | Sweden | Skelleftea (Swe J20) | 31-16-20-36 |
| 15 | Daniil But | LW | 6-5/200 | 15-Feb-05 | Russia | Loko Yaroslavl-Loko-76 Yaroslavl (MHL) | 32-18-14-32 |
| 16 | David Reinbacher | D | 6-2/185 | 25-Oct-04 | Austria | Kloten (Sui-NL) | 46-3-19-22 |
| 17 | Eduard Sale | LW | 6-1/170 | 10-Mar-05 | Czech | HC Kometa Brno (Czechia) | 43-7-7-14 |
| 18 | Samuel Honzek | LW | 6-3/185 | 12-Nov-04 | Slovakia | Vancouver (WHL) | 43-23-33-56 |
| 19 | Mikhail Gulyayev | D | 5-11/170 | 26-Apr-05 | Russia | Omskie Yastreby (MHL) | 22-2-23-25 |
| 20 | Lukas Dragicevic | D | 6-1/190 | 25-Apr-05 | Canada | Tri-City (WHL) | 68-15-60-75 |
| 21 | Gabe Perreault | RW | 5-11/165 | 7-May-05 | USA | USN U18 (USDP) | 62-53-79-132 |
| 22 | Otto Stenberg | C | 5-11/180 | 29-May-05 | Sweden | Frolunda (Swe J20) | 29-11-15-26 |
| 23 | Tom Willander | D | 6-1/180 | 9-Feb-05 | Sweden | Rogle (Swe J20) | 39-4-21-25 |
| 24 | Calum Ritchie | C | 6-2/185 | 21-Jan-05 | Canada | Oshawa (OHL) | 59-24-35-59 |
| 25 | Andrew Cristall | LW | 5-9/165 | 4-Feb-05 | Canada | Kelowna (WHL) | 54-39-56-95 |
| 26 | Gavin Brindley | C | 5-8/165 | 5-Oct-04 | USA | Michigan (B1G) | 41-12-26-38 |
| 27 | Bradly Nadeau | LW | 5-10/165 | 5-May-05 | Canada | Penticton (BCHL) | 54-45-68-113 |
| 28 | Anton Wahlberg | C | 6-3/195 | 4-Jul-05 | Sweden | Malmo (Swe J20) | 32-14-13-27 |
| 29 | Riley Heidt | C | 5-10/180 | 25-Mar-05 | Canada | Prince George (WHL) | 68-25-72-97 |
| 30 | Brayden Yager | C | 5-11/165 | 3-Jan-05 | Canada | Moose Jaw (WHL) | 67-28-50-78 |
| 31 | David Edstrom | C | 6-3/185 | 18-Feb-05 | Sweden | Frolunda (Swe J20) | 28-15-13-28 |
| 32 | Nick Lardis | LW | 5-10/165 | 8-Jul-05 | Canada | Pbo-Ham (OHL) | 69-37-28-65 |
| 33 | Kasper Halttunen | RW | 6-3/205 | 7-Jun-05 | Finland | HIFK (Fin-Liiga) | 27-0-1-1 |
| 34 | Jayden Perron | RW | 5-9/165 | 11-Jan-05 | Canada | Chicago (USHL) | 61-24-48-72 |
| 35 | Oliver Bonk | D | 6-2/175 | 9-Jan-05 | Canada | London (OHL) | 67-10-30-40 |
| 36 | Quentin Musty | LW | 6-2/200 | 6-Jul-05 | USA | Sudbury (OHL) | 53-26-52-78 |
| 37 | Trey Augustine | G | 6-1/185 | 23-Feb-05 | USA | USN U18 (USDP) | 28-1, 2.14, 0.925 |
| 38 | Tanner Molendyk | D | 5-11/185 | 3-Feb-05 | Canada | Saskatoon (WHL) | 67-9-28-37 |
| 39 | William Whitelaw | RW | 5-9/170 | 5-Feb-05 | USA | Youngstown (USHL) | 62-36-25-61 |
| 40 | Ethan Gauthier | RW | 5-11/175 | 26-Jan-05 | Canada | Sherbrooke (QMJHL) | 66-30-39-69 |
| 41 | Gracyn Sawchyn | C | 5-11/160 | 19-Jan-05 | USA | Seattle (WHL) | 58-18-40-58 |
| 42 | Carson Bjarnason | G | 6-3/185 | 30-Jun-05 | Canada | Brandon (WHL) | 21-19, 3.08, 0.900 |
| 43 | Aram Minnetian | D | 5-11/190 | 19-Mar-05 | USA | USN U18 (USDP) | 61-7-24-31 |
| 44 | Michael Hrabal | G | 6-6/210 | 20-Jan-05 | Czech | Omaha (USHL) | 9-13, 2.86, 0.908 |
| 45 | Jacob Fowler | G | 6-1/215 | 24-Nov-04 | USA | Youngstown (USHL) | 27-9, 2.28, 0.921 |
| 46 | Oscar Fisker Molgaard | C | 6-0/165 | 18-Feb-05 | Denmark | HV 71 (SHL) | 41-4-3-7 |
| 47 | Carson Rehkopf | LW | 6-1/195 | 7-Jan-05 | Canada | Kitchener (OHL) | 68-30-29-59 |
| 48 | Beau Akey | D | 5-11/170 | 11-Feb-05 | Canada | Barrie (OHL) | 66-11-36-47 |
| 49 | Danny Nelson | C | 6-3/200 | 3-Aug-05 | USA | USN U18 (USDP) | 61-20-26-46 |
| 50 | Etienne Morin | D | 6-0/180 | 9-Mar-05 | Canada | Moncton (QMJHL) | 67-21-51-72 |
| 51 | Felix Nilsson | C | 6-0/175 | 22-Jun-05 | Sweden | Rogle (Swe J20) | 36-19-22-41 |
| 52 | Maxim Strbak | D | 6-1/205 | 13-Apr-05 | Slovakia | Sioux Falls (USHL) | 46-5-13-18 |
| 53 | Jakub Dvorak | D | 6-5/205 | 25-May-05 | Czech | Bili Tygri Liberec (Czechia) | 24-0-2-2 |
| 54 | Carey Terrance | C | 6-0/175 | 10-May-05 | USA | Erie (OHL) | 67-30-17-47 |
| 55 | Jesse Kiiskinen | RW | 5-11/180 | 23-Aug-05 | Finland | Pelicans (Fin-U20) | 31-20-23-43 |
| 56 | Mathieu Cataford | C | 5-11/185 | 1-Mar-05 | Canada | Halifax (QMJHL) | 68-31-44-75 |
| 57 | Roman Kantserov | RW | 5-9/175 | 20-Sep-04 | Russia | Stalnye Lisy Magnitogorsk (MHL) | 45-27-27-54 |
| 58 | Tristan Bertucci | D | 6-1/170 | 12-Jul-05 | Canada | Flint (OHL) | 63-11-39-50 |
| 59 | Andrew Gibson | D | 6-3/195 | 13-Feb-05 | Canada | Soo Greyhounds (OHL) | 45-7-14-21 |
| 60 | Caden Price | D | 6-0/185 | 24-Aug-05 | Canada | Kelowna (WHL) | 65-5-35-40 |
| 61 | Charlie Stramel | C | 6-3/215 | 15-Oct-04 | USA | Wisconsin (B1G) | 33-5-7-12 |
| 62 | Coulson Pitre | RW | 6-0/170 | 13-Dec-04 | Canada | Flint (OHL) | 59-25-35-60 |
| 63 | Adam Gajan | G | 6-2/165 | 6-May-04 | Slovakia | Chippewa Steel (NAHL) | 19-12, 2.57, 0.917 |
| 64 | Hoyt Stanley | D | 6-2/185 | 4-Feb-05 | Canada | Victoria (BCHL) | 53-4-34-38 |
| 65 | Andrew Strathmann | D | 5-10/190 | 27-Feb-05 | USA | Youngstown (USHL) | 56-3-35-38 |
| 66 | Hunter Brzustewicz | D | 5-11/185 | 29-Nov-04 | USA | Kitchener (OHL) | 68-6-51-57 |
| 67 | Luca Pinelli | C | 5-8/165 | 5-Apr-05 | Canada | Ottawa (OHL) | 67-29-34-63 |
| 68 | Cam Allen | D | 6-0/195 | 7-Jan-05 | Canada | Guelph (OHL) | 62-5-20-25 |
| 69 | Tanner Ludtke | C | 6-0/185 | 27-Nov-04 | USA | Lincoln (USHL) | 57-32-34-66 |
| 70 | Theo Lindstein | D | 6-0/180 | 5-Jan-05 | Sweden | Brynas (SHL) | 32-1-1-2 |
| 71 | Koehn Ziemmer | RW | 6-0/205 | 8-Dec-04 | Canada | Prince George (WHL) | 68-41-48-89 |
| 72 | Carter Sotheran | D | 6-3/195 | 26-Jun-05 | Canada | Portland (WHL) | 68-4-19-23 |
| 73 | Arttu Karki | D | 6-1/175 | 8-Dec-04 | Finland | Tappara (Fin-U20) | 36-13-26-39 |
| 74 | Albert Wikman | D | 6-0/190 | 10-Mar-05 | Sweden | Farjestads (Swe J20) | 43-2-10-12 |
| 75 | Quinton Burns | D | 6-1/180 | 14-Apr-05 | Canada | Kingston (OHL) | 54-2-27-29 |
| 76 | Nico Myatovic | LW | 6-2/180 | 1-Dec-04 | Canada | Seattle (WHL) | 68-30-30-60 |
| 77 | Jeremy Hanzel | D | 6-0/190 | 27-Feb-03 | Canada | Seattle (WHL) | 66-13-35-48 |
| 78 | Easton Cowan | RW | 5-10/170 | 20-May-05 | Canada | London (OHL) | 68-20-33-53 |
| 79 | Juraj Pekarcik | LW | 6-2/185 | 12-Sep-05 | Slovakia | HK Nitra (Slovakia) | 30-0-3-3 |
| 80 | Denver Barkey | C | 5-8/160 | 27-Apr-05 | Canada | London (OHL) | 61-22-37-59 |
| 81 | Martin Misiak | RW | 6-2/195 | 30-Sep-04 | Slovakia | HC Nove Zamky (Slovakia) | 29-1-9-10 |
| 82 | Drew Fortescue | D | 6-1/175 | 28-Apr-05 | USA | USN U18 (USDP) | 61-1-25-26 |
| 83 | Felix Unger Sorum | RW | 5-11/170 | 14-Sep-05 | Sweden | Leksands (Swe J20) | 42-10-36-46 |
| 84 | Lenni Hameenaho | RW | 6-0/175 | 7-Nov-04 | Finland | Assat (Fin-Liiga) | 51-9-12-21 |
| 85 | Kalan Lind | LW | 6-0/160 | 25-Jan-05 | Canada | Red Deer (WHL) | 43-16-28-44 |
| 86 | Rasmus Kumpulainen | C | 6-2/190 | 8-Aug-05 | Finland | Pelicans (Fin-U20) | 41-11-23-34 |
| 87 | Alex Ciernik | LW | 5-11/175 | 8-Oct-04 | Slovakia | Sodertalje-Vasterviks (HockeyAllsvenskan) | 25-3-9-12 |
| 88 | Alexander Rykov | RW | 6-0/175 | 14-Jul-05 | Russia | Chelmet Chelyabinsk (VHL) | 20-4-7-11 |
| 89 | Scott Ratzlaff | G | 6-0/175 | 9-Mar-05 | Canada | Seattle (WHL) | 25-8, 2.15, 0.918 |
| 90 | Yegor Rimashevsky | RW | 6-3/200 | 1-Feb-05 | Belarus | MHK Dynamo Moskva (MHL) | 29-13-13-26 |
| 91 | Jesse Nurmi | LW | 5-10/165 | 7-Mar-05 | Finland | KooKoo (Fin-U20) | 41-21-29-50 |
| 92 | Kaden Hammell | D | 6-1/175 | 12-Mar-05 | Canada | Kam-Evt (WHL) | 67-8-18-26 |
| 93 | Jayson Shaugabay | RW | 5-9/155 | 4-May-05 | USA | Warroad (USHS-MN) | 31-33-63-96 |
| 94 | Noel Nordh | RW | 6-2/195 | 25-Jan-05 | Sweden | Brynas (Swe J20) | 38-13-14-27 |
| 95 | Gavin McCarthy | D | 6-1/180 | 2-Jun-05 | USA | Muskegon (USHL) | 42-8-19-27 |
| 96 | Tyler Peddle | LW | 6-0/195 | 28-Jan-05 | Canada | Drummondville (QMJHL) | 64-24-17-41 |
| 97 | Francesco Dell'Elce | D | 6-0/165 | 23-Jun-05 | Canada | St. Andrew's (CHS-O) | 51-20-42-62 |
| 98 | Timur Mukhanov | LW | 5-8/170 | 17-Jun-05 | Russia | Omskie Krylia (VHL) | 31-4-4-8 |
| 99 | Larry Keenan | D | 6-3/185 | 15-Mar-05 | Russia | Culver Academy (USHS-IN) | 49-11-26-37 |
| 100 | Emil Jarventie | LW | 5-9/165 | 4-Apr-05 | Finland | Ilves (Fin-U20) | 21-8-11-19 |
| 101 | Matthew Mania | D | 6-1/180 | 11-Jan-05 | USA | Sudbury (OHL) | 67-10-28-38 |
| 102 | Juha Jatkola | G | 6-1/175 | 12-Sep-02 | Finland | KalPa (Fin-Liiga) | 20-11, 2.16, 0.903 |
| 103 | Zach Nehring | RW | 6-3/180 | 7-Mar-05 | USA | Shattuck-SM (USHS-MN) | 48-34-40-74 |
| 104 | Austin Roest | C | 5-9/175 | 22-Jan-04 | Canada | Everett (WHL) | 60-32-46-78 |
| 105 | Hedqvist, Isac | C | 5-10/165 | 22-Mar-05 | Sweden | Lulea (Swe J20) | 41-14-20-34 |
| 106 | Stephen Peck | G | 6-2/170 | 18-Jan-05 | USA | Avon Old Farms (USHS-CT) | 28GP, 1.26, 0.948 |
| 107 | Yegor Klimovich | RW | 5-9/160 | 14-May-05 | Russia | Sibirskie Snaipery Novosibirsk (MHL) | 36-19-30-49 |
| 108 | Nikita Susuyev | RW | 6-0/170 | 6-Feb-05 | Russia | MHK Spartak Moskva (MHL) | 38-11-17-28 |
| 109 | Ethan Miedema | LW | 6-4/205 | 22-Mar-05 | Canada | Wsr-Kgn (OHL) | 68-20-32-52 |
| 110 | Luca Cagnoni | D | 5-9/180 | 21-Dec-04 | Canada | Portland (WHL) | 67-17-47-64 |
| 111 | Jakub Stancl | LW | 6-3/200 | 10-Apr-05 | Czech | Vaxjo Lakers (Swe J20) | 35-11-6-17 |
| 112 | Aydar Suniev | LW | 6-1/200 | 16-Nov-04 | Russia | Penticton (BCHL) | 50-45-45-90 |
| 113 | Ty Henricks | LW | 6-4/205 | 28-Jun-05 | USA | Fgo-Mus (USHL) | 47-9-10-19 |
| 114 | Yegor Vinogradov | C | 6-2/180 | 17-Apr-03 | Russia | Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod (KHL) | 53-7-10-17 |
| 115 | Yegor Sidorov | RW | 5-11/180 | 18-Jun-04 | Belarus | Saskatoon (WHL) | 53-40-36-76 |
| 116 | Will Vote | RW | 5-8/155 | 22-Feb-05 | USA | USN U18 (USDP) | 60-16-29-45 |
| 117 | Brandon Svoboda | C | 6-3/210 | 4-Feb-05 | USA | Youngstown (USHL) | 59-16-10-26 |
| 118 | Axel Landen | D | 6-1/185 | 29-Mar-05 | Sweden | HV 71 (Swe J20) | 44-10-6-16 |
| 119 | Alexander Hellnemo | G | 6-2/180 | 5-Jan-04 | Sweden | Skelleftea (Swe J20) | 15-8, 2.32, 0.916 |
| 120 | Nikita Nedopyokin | C | 5-10/185 | 22-Mar-05 | Russia | SKA-1946 St. Petersburg (MHL) | 37-14-18-32 |
| 121 | Brady Cleveland | D | 6-5/210 | 1-Apr-05 | USA | USN U18 (USDP) | 54-0-6-6 |
| 122 | Ondrej Molnar | LW | 5-10/170 | 8-Feb-05 | Slovakia | Erie (OHL) | 34-4-15-19 |
| 123 | Noah Dower Nilsson | LW | 6-0/175 | 25-Apr-05 | Sweden | Frolunda (Swe J20) | 37-26-28-54 |
| 124 | Jordan Tourigny | D | 5-10/165 | 28-Feb-05 | Canada | Shawinigan (QMJHL) | 67-6-35-41 |
| 125 | Cole Knuble | C | 5-11/175 | 1-Jul-04 | USA | Fargo (USHL) | 57-30-36-66 |
| 126 | Erik Pahlsson | C | 6-0/170 | 9-Apr-04 | Sweden | HV 71 (Swe J20) | 46-26-37-63 |
| 127 | Eric Pohlkamp | D | 5-10/200 | 23-Mar-04 | USA | Cedar Rapids (USHL) | 59-16-35-51 |
| 128 | Dylan MacKinnon | D | 6-1/185 | 12-Jan-05 | Canada | Halifax (QMJHL) | 61-6-17-23 |
| 129 | German Tochilkin | LW | 6-2/180 | 24-Sep-03 | Russia | Kunlun Red Star (KHL) | 21-4-2-6 |
| 130 | Jake Fisher | C | 6-1/180 | 27-Mar-05 | USA | Cretin-Durham Hall (USHS-MN) | 29-34-29-63 |
| 131 | Damian Clara | G | 6-6/215 | 13-Jan-05 | Italy | Farjestads (Swe J20) | 17-17, 2.79, 0.903 |
| 132 | Aiden Fink | RW | 5-9/155 | 24-Nov-04 | Canada | Brooks (AJHL) | 54-41-56-97 |
| 133 | Bogdan Konyushkov | D | 5-11/175 | 20-Dec-02 | Russia | Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod (KHL) | 64-2-23-25 |
| 134 | Yegor Zavragin | G | 6-2/185 | 23-Aug-05 | Russia | Mamonty Yugry (MHL) | 11-6, 2.49, 0.920 |
| 135 | Ty Halaburda | C | 5-11/175 | 22-Apr-05 | Canada | Vancouver (WHL) | 66-21-16-37 |
| 136 | Cole Burbidge | LW | 6-1/160 | 26-Aug-05 | Canada | Saint John (QMJHL) | 68-19-31-50 |
| 137 | Daniil Karpovich | D | 6-3/210 | 6-Dec-04 | Belarus | Avto Yekaterinburg (MHL) | 47-10-25-35 |
| 138 | Andrei Loshko | C | 6-1/175 | 7-Oct-04 | Belarus | Chicoutimi (QMJHL) | 67-22-48-70 |
| 139 | Beckett Hendrickson | C | 6-1/175 | 24-Jun-05 | USA | USN U18 (USDP) | 51-13-21-34 |
| 140 | Alex Pharand | C | 6-3/205 | 1-May-05 | Canada | Sudbury (OHL) | 67-18-21-39 |
| 141 | Zeb Forsfjall | C | 5-9/170 | 16-Jan-05 | Sweden | Skelleftea (Swe J20) | 34-8-14-22 |
| 142 | Joe Connor | C | 5-9/170 | 31-Mar-05 | USA | Avon Old Farms (USHS-CT) | 28-21-23-44 |
| 143 | Samuel Urban | G | 6-1/195 | 1-May-05 | Slovakia | Team Slovakia U18 (Svk2) | 1-13, 4.51, 0.897 |
| 144 | Mazden Leslie | D | 6-0/195 | 15-Apr-05 | Canada | Vancouver (WHL) | 66-12-38-50 |
| 145 | Maxim Fedotov | D | 5-10/170 | 22-Jan-02 | Russia | Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod (KHL) | 64-9-17-26 |
| 146 | Joey Willis | C | 5-10/170 | 14-Mar-05 | USA | Saginaw (OHL) | 68-15-29-44 |
| 147 | Artyom Kashtanov | C | 6-6/190 | 9-Dec-04 | Russia | Avto Yekaterinburg (MHL) | 43-15-25-40 |
| 148 | Angus MacDonell | C | 5-9/180 | 11-May-05 | Canada | Sar-Mis (OHL) | 64-29-12-41 |
| 149 | Konstantin Volochko | D | 6-0/170 | 19-Jun-05 | Belarus | Dinamo-Shinnik Bobruysk (MHL) | 46-8-12-20 |
| 150 | Hannes Hellberg | LW | 6-0/175 | 19-Jun-05 | Sweden | Leksands (Swe J20) | 42-34-23-57 |
| 151 | Carsen Musser | G | 6-4/215 | 19-May-05 | USA | USN U18 (USDP) | 14-6, 3.07, 0.890 |
| 152 | Yaroslav Tsulygin | D | 6-0/160 | 19-May-05 | Russia | Salavat Yulaev Ufa (KHL) | 44-0-2-2 |
| 153 | Thomas Milic | G | 6-0/180 | 14-Apr-03 | Canada | Seattle (WHL) | 27-3, 2.08, 0.928 |
| 154 | Arno Tiefensee | G | 6-4/190 | 1-May-02 | Germany | Adler Mannheim (DEL) | 13-10, 2.43, 0.910 |
| 155 | Quinn Mantei | D | 5-11/180 | 23-Apr-05 | Canada | Brandon (WHL) | 67-2-23-25 |
| 156 | Matthew Soto | RW | 5-10/180 | 31-Aug-05 | Canada | Kingston (OHL) | 54-15-27-42 |
| 157 | Matt Copponi | C | 5-10/165 | 3-Jun-03 | USA | Merrimack (HE) | 37-14-15-29 |
| 158 | Vojtech Port | D | 6-2/170 | 3-Aug-05 | Czech | RD-Edm (WHL) | 48-4-13-17 |
| 159 | Michael DeAngelo | LW | 5-11/180 | 19-Nov-04 | USA | Green Bay (USHL) | 52-11-24-35 |
| 160 | Matteo Mann | D | 6-5/225 | 31-Dec-04 | Canada | Chicoutimi (QMJHL) | 45-0-5-5 |
| 161 | Paul Fischer | D | 6-1/190 | 30-Jan-05 | USA | USN U18 (USDP) | 55-4-17-21 |
| 162 | Hudson Malinoski | C | 6-0/175 | 19-May-04 | Canada | Brooks (AJHL) | 44-16-53-69 |
| 163 | Brad Gardiner | C | 6-0/180 | 6-Mar-05 | Canada | Ottawa (OHL) | 68-19-20-39 |
| 164 | Zaccharya Wisdom | RW | 6-0/175 | 29-Apr-04 | Canada | Cedar Rapids (USHL) | 59-28-20-48 |
| 165 | Jonathan Castagna | C | 6-1/185 | 20-Apr-05 | Canada | St. Andrew's (CHS-O) | 50-29-43-72 |
| 166 | Tanner Adams | RW | 5-11/185 | 2-Sep-05 | USA | Tri-City (USHL) | 49-12-21-33 |
| 167 | Grayden Siepmann | D | 5-10/185 | 26-May-04 | Canada | Calgary (WHL) | 61-9-34-43 |
| 168 | Axel Hurtig | D | 6-3/200 | 10-Jun-05 | Sweden | Rogle (Swe J20) | 34-2-6-8 |
| 169 | Ian Scherzer | C | 6-0/180 | 3-Jul-05 | Austria | Rogle (Swe J20) | 30-3-4-7 |
| 170 | Ryan Conmy | RW | 5-9/190 | 23-Oct-04 | USA | Sioux City (USHL) | 60-33-29-62 |
| 171 | Ethan Hay | C | 6-1/190 | 15-Jan-05 | Canada | Flint (OHL) | 64-17-11-28 |
| 172 | Rodwin Dionicio | D | 6-2/205 | 30-Mar-04 | Switzerland | Nia-Wsr (OHL) | 50-15-35-50 |
| 173 | Josh Van Mulligen | D | 6-2/180 | 26-Jul-05 | Canada | Medicine Hat (WHL) | 68-1-8-9 |
| 174 | Nikita Ishimnikov | D | 6-3/195 | 21-Apr-05 | Russia | Avto Yekaterinburg (MHL) | 41-11-7-18 |
| 175 | Justin Kipkie | D | 6-4/190 | 28-Jul-05 | Canada | Victoria (WHL) | 67-8-25-33 |
| 176 | Sawyer Mynio | D | 6-1/175 | 30-Apr-05 | Canada | Seattle (WHL) | 68-5-26-31 |
| 177 | Brady Stonehouse | RW | 5-9/180 | 6-Aug-04 | Canada | Ottawa (OHL) | 68-37-20-57 |
| 178 | Hunter Anderson | LW | 5-9/175 | 28-Apr-05 | USA | Shattuck-SM (USHS-MN) | 48-52-47-99 |
| 179 | Spencer Sova | D | 6-0/185 | 10-Jan-04 | Canada | Erie (OHL) | 68-16-23-39 |
| 180 | Oliver Tulk | C | 5-7/170 | 19-Jan-05 | Canada | Calgary (WHL) | 68-24-36-60 |
| 181 | Isac Born | C | 5-11/165 | 7-Jul-04 | Sweden | Frolunda (SHL) | 36-2-3-5 |
| 182 | Beau Jelsma | C | 5-9/175 | 28-Apr-04 | Canada | Barrie (OHL) | 67-31-30-61 |
| 183 | Carmelo Crandell | RW | 5-11/170 | 2-Mar-05 | Canada | Sherwood Park (AJHL) | 49-17-37-54 |
| 184 | Stanislav Yarovoy | LW | 6-2/195 | 26-Aug-03 | Russia | Vityaz Moscow Region (KHL) | 45-9-7-16 |
| 185 | Elliot Stahlberg | LW | 6-0/185 | 29-Mar-05 | Sweden | Farjestads (Swe J20) | 35-9-12-21 |
| 186 | Ivan Anoshko | C | 5-11/170 | 7-Oct-04 | Belarus | Dinamo-Shinnik Bobruysk (MHL) | 53-21-32-53 |
| 187 | Jake Livanavage | D | 5-10/175 | 6-May-04 | USA | Chicago (USHL) | 48-6-30-36 |
| 188 | Adrian Carnebo | D | 6-2/185 | 1-May-04 | Sweden | Djurgardens (Swe J20) | 43-7-28-35 |
| 189 | Jaden Lipinski | C | 6-3/205 | 2-Dec-04 | USA | Vancouver (WHL) | 66-19-32-51 |
| 190 | Ian Blomquist | G | 6-2/185 | 29-Mar-03 | Sweden | Vasteras (HockeyAllsvenskan) | 4-11, 2.97, 0.904 |
| 191 | Emil Pieniniemi | D | 6-2/170 | 2-Mar-05 | Finland | Karpat (Fin-U20) | 31-1-12-13 |
| 192 | Oskar Asplund | D | 5-11/175 | 18-Nov-03 | Sweden | Almtuna (HockeyAllsvenskan) | 49-6-24-30 |
| 193 | Daniil Davydov | C | 5-11/165 | 6-Mar-04 | Russia | MHK Dynamo St. Petersburg (MHL) | 47-11-35-46 |
| 194 | Victor Sjoholm | D | 5-9/175 | 8-Jul-03 | Sweden | HV 71 (Swe J20) | 37-2-8-10 |
| 195 | Aron Jessli | LW | 5-11/185 | 29-Oct-04 | Norway | Pickering (OJHL) | 52-25-43-68 |
| 196 | Adam Dybal | G | 6-1/165 | 2-Sep-05 | Czech | Karlovy Vary (Czechia U20) | 29-15, 1.85, 0.942 |
| 197 | Jonathan Fauchon | C | 5-10/170 | 13-Jan-04 | Canada | Blainville-Boisbriand (QMJHL) | 53-25-40-65 |
| 198 | Luke Mittelstadt | D | 5-11/175 | 22-Jan-03 | USA | Minnesota (B1G) | 38-5-16-21 |
| 199 | Owen Beckner | C | 6-1/175 | 27-Feb-05 | Canada | Salmon Arm (BCHL) | 53-17-33-50 |
| 200 | Ilya Kanarsky | G | 6-2/165 | 6-Dec-04 | Russia | AKM-Junior Tula Region (MHL) | 4-19, 3.59, 0.919 |
| 201 | Braeden Bowman | RW | 6-1/205 | 26-Jun-03 | Canada | Guelph (OHL) | 54-33-39-72 |
| 202 | Luke Coughlin | D | 5-9/170 | 11-Apr-05 | Canada | Rimouski (QMJHL) | 37-5-14-19 |
| 203 | Norwin Panocha | D | 6-1/185 | 24-Feb-05 | Germany | Eisbaren Juniors Berlin (DNL U20) | 34-6-16-22 |
| 204 | Cole Brown | LW | 6-2/180 | 27-Apr-05 | Canada | Hamilton (OHL) | 60-17-25-42 |
| 205 | Tomas Suchanek | G | 6-0/180 | 30-Apr-03 | Czech | Tri-City (WHL) | 27-14, 3.05, 0.912 |
| 206 | Vadim Moroz | RW | 6-2/185 | 20-Nov-03 | Belarus | Dinamo Minsk (KHL) | 39-5-9-14 |
| 207 | Davis Burnside | RW | 5-11/175 | 22-Sep-03 | USA | Ohio State (B1G) | 40-14-7-21 |
| 208 | Maros Jedlicka | C | 6-1/185 | 23-Oct-02 | Slovakia | HKM Zvolen (Slovakia) | 39-17-18-35 |
| 209 | Gavyn Thoreson | RW | 5-8/180 | 30-Oct-04 | USA | Andover High (USHS-MN) | 31-41-56-97 |
| 210 | Austin Burnevik | RW | 6-3/200 | 3-Jan-05 | USA | USN U18 (USDP) | 43-6-13-19 |
| 211 | Elmeri Laakso | D | 6-1/185 | 19-Jul-04 | Finland | SaiPa (Fin-Liiga) | 32-4-7-11 |
| 212 | Frantisek Dej | C | 6-4/200 | 28-Feb-05 | Slovakia | HC Modre Kridla Slovan (Slovakia2) | 24-8-13-21 |
| 213 | Matvei Maximov | C | 6-0/175 | 18-Jan-05 | Russia | MHK Dynamo Moskva (MHL) | 48-18-19-37 |
| 214 | Connor Levis | RW | 6-1/190 | 5-Oct-04 | Canada | Kamloops (WHL) | 68-27-40-67 |
| 215 | Teddy Townsend | C | 5-10/160 | 2-Sep-05 | USA | Eden Prairie (USHS-MN) | 27-14-25-39 |
| 216 | Petter Vesterheim | C | 5-11/165 | 30-Sep-04 | Norway | Mora (Swe J20) | 41-12-27-39 |
| 217 | Justin Gill | C | 6-1/190 | 27-Jan-03 | Canada | Sherbrooke (QMJHL) | 68-44-49-93 |
| 218 | Alex Weiermair | C | 6-0/190 | 10-May-05 | USA | USN U18 (USDP) | 55-11-15-26 |
| 219 | Jan Sprynar | RW | 6-1/175 | 26-Feb-05 | Czech | Rimouski (QMJHL) | 60-23-17-40 |
| 220 | Ty Higgins | D | 6-0/185 | 26-Sep-04 | Canada | Acadie-Bathurst (QMJHL) | 68-13-28-41 |
| 221 | Tom Leppa | C | 6-0/175 | 31-Jul-05 | Finland | Jokerit (Fin-U20) | 45-19-12-31 |
| 222 | Aaron Pionk | D | 6-1/175 | 16-Jan-03 | USA | Waterloo (USHL) | 60-12-24-36 |
| 223 | Hampton Slukynsky | G | 6-1/180 | 2-Jul-05 | USA | Warroad (USHS-MN) | 28-1, 1.47, 0.941 |
| 224 | Noah Erliden | G | 5-10/170 | 9-Sep-05 | Sweden | HV71 (Swe J20) | 10-8, 2.93, 0.912 |
| HM | Matthew Andonovski | D | 6-1/200 | 14-Mar-05 | Canada | Kitchener (OHL) | 67-0-16-16 |
| HM | Gleb Artsatbanov | G | 6-2/170 | 2-Mar-04 | Ukraine | Sparta Praha (Czechia U20) | 13-10, 1.95, 0.938 |
| HM | Cale Ashcroft | D | 5-10/200 | 5-Aug-04 | Canada | Tri-City (USHL) | 62-8-29-37 |
| HM | Alex Assadourian | LW | 5-8/170 | 24-Jul-05 | Canada | Sby-Nia (OHL) | 66-12-29-41 |
| HM | Arvid Bergstrom | D | 5-11/160 | 12-Jun-05 | Sweden | Djurgardens (Swe J20) | 41-2-21-23 |
| HM | Kevin Bicker | LW | 6-0/175 | 29-Jan-05 | Germany | Jungadler Mannheim (DNL U20) | 20-10-11-21 |
| HM | Philippe Blais-Savoie | D | 6-0/185 | 10-Jun-05 | USA | Tri-City (USHL) | 61-2-9-11 |
| HM | Linus Brandl | C | 5-11/185 | 1-Apr-05 | Germany | Jungadler Mannheim (DNL U20) | 32-25-22-47 |
| HM | Finn Brink | LW | 5-9/180 | 6-Apr-05 | USA | Maple Grove (USHS-MN) | 31-31-38-69 |
| HM | Yaroslav Busygin | D | 6-3/185 | 14-Feb-03 | Russia | Vityaz Moscow Region (KHL) | 42-1-2-3 |
| HM | Kalle Carlsson | C | 6-0/175 | 2-Mar-05 | Sweden | Orebro (Swe J20) | 44-11-24-35 |
| HM | Adam Cedzo | RW | 5-10/165 | 23-Feb-05 | Slovakia | HC Ocelari Trinec (Czechia U20) | 39-23-23-46 |
| HM | Aiden Celebrini | D | 6-1/185 | 26-Oct-04 | Canada | Brooks (AJHL) | 47-5-16-21 |
| HM | Andon Cerbone | C | 5-8/150 | 13-Apr-04 | USA | Oma-Yng (USHL) | 64-24-39-63 |
| HM | Chase Cheslock | D | 6-3/210 | 25-Oct-04 | USA | Rogers High (USHS-MN) | 28-4-27-31 |
| HM | Sam Court | D | 5-10/180 | 7-Jan-04 | Canada | Brooks (AJHL) | 52-13-59-72 |
| HM | Adam Csabi | LW | 5-10/160 | 17-Feb-05 | Czech | SaiPa (Fin-U18) | 28-16-15-31 |
| HM | Nathaniel Davis | D | 6-1/185 | 15-Nov-04 | Canada | Burlington (OJHL) | 45-10-26-36 |
| HM | Nathan Day | G | 6-2/180 | 4-Feb-05 | Canada | Flint (OHL) | 17-10, 3.91, 0.874 |
| HM | Kocha Delic | C | 5-10/185 | 11-Mar-04 | Canada | Sudbury (OHL) | 46-22-30-52 |
| HM | Tyler Duke | D | 5-8/180 | 19-Jul-04 | USA | Ohio State (B1G) | 40-4-8-12 |
| HM | Filip Eriksson | C | 6-0/170 | 5-Nov-04 | Sweden | Vaxjo Lakers (Swe J20) | 11-5-5-10 |
| HM | Jiri Felcman | C | 6-4/190 | 17-Apr-05 | Czech | Langnau U20 (Sui-U20-Elit) | 40-10-21-31 |
| HM | Samuel Fiala | C | 6-1/170 | 9-Apr-05 | Czech | Bili Tygri Liberec (Czechia U20) | 44-19-9-28 |
| HM | Mans Forsfjall | D | 6-0/180 | 30-Jul-02 | Sweden | Skelleftea (SHL) | 52-2-12-14 |
| HM | Cooper Foster | C | 5-11/170 | 4-Jun-05 | Canada | Ottawa (OHL) | 63-19-17-36 |
| HM | Salvatore Guzzo | RW | 6-0/185 | 17-Apr-05 | USA | USN U18 (USDP) | 58-17-11-28 |
| HM | Michael Hagens | D | 5-11/170 | 18-Feb-05 | USA | Chicago (USHL) | 60-9-17-26 |
| HM | Sam Harris | LW | 5-11/190 | 14-Oct-03 | USA | Sioux Falls (USHL) | 56-30-26-56 |
| HM | Jack Harvey | C | 5-10/175 | 31-Mar-03 | USA | Chicago (USHL) | 62-40-34-74 |
| HM | Bogdans Hodass | D | 6-2/200 | 13-Apr-03 | Latvia | Medicine Hat (WHL) | 56-11-24-35 |
| HM | Ryan Hopkins | D | 6-1/180 | 15-Apr-04 | Canada | Penticton (BCHL) | 48-10-39-49 |
| HM | Ewan Huet | G | 6-0/170 | 8-Feb-05 | Switzerland | Lausanne (Sui U20-Elit) | 14-12, 2.73 |
| HM | Gustaf Kangas | C | 6-0/175 | 27-Jul-05 | Sweden | Vasteras (Swe J20) | 27-7-13-20 |
| HM | Sean Keohane | D | 6-3/180 | 4-Nov-04 | USA | Dexter Southfield(USHS-MA) | 32-4-12-16 |
| HM | Oiva Keskinen | C | 6-0/175 | 28-Feb-04 | Finland | Tappara (Fin-U20) | 38-20-21-41 |
| HM | Ruslan Khazheyev | G | 6-4/200 | 20-Nov-04 | Russia | Belye Medvedi Chelyabinsk (MHL) | 8-8, 2.38, 0.923 |
| HM | Matteo Koci | D | 6-0/165 | 7-Jun-05 | Czech | HC Energie Karlovy Vary (Czechia U20) | 36-7-13-20 |
| HM | Ryan Koering | D | 6-3/185 | 11-Feb-05 | USA | Eden Prairie (USHS-MN) | 27-6-10-16 |
| HM | Cameron Korpi | G | 6-2/150 | 26-May-04 | USA | Tri-City (USHL) | 13-4, 2.52, 0.911 |
| HM | Sergei Kosovets | D | 6-5/250 | 17-Jul-02 | Russia | HK Sochi (KHL) | 26-2-2-4 |
| HM | Artyom Kudashov | D | 6-0/160 | 10-Jan-05 | Russia | MHK Dynamo Moskva (MHL) | 42-2-7-9 |
| HM | Roman Kukumberg | LW | 6-0/185 | 21-Mar-05 | Slovakia | HC Modre Kridla Slovan (Slovakia2) | 33-5-6-11 |
| HM | Emil Kuusla | LW | 5-9/165 | 11-Jan-05 | Finland | Jokerit (Fin-U20) | 36-18-17-35 |
| HM | Jani Lampinen | G | 6-2/185 | 14-Feb-03 | Finland | Kiekko-Espoo (Fin-Mestis) | 15-6, 2.35, 0.902 |
| HM | Charles-Alexis Legault | D | 6-3/205 | 5-Sep-03 | Canada | Quinnipiac (ECAC) | 40-2-7-9 |
| HM | Aiden Long | LW | 6-3/190 | 13-Mar-05 | Canada | Whitecourt (AJHL) | 50-19-27-46 |
| HM | Connor MacPherson | RW | 6-0/170 | 2-Mar-05 | Canada | Leamington (GOJHL) | 43-28-35-63 |
| HM | Matthew Mayich | D | 6-2/185 | 21-Dec-04 | Canada | Ottawa (OHL) | 64-5-17-22 |
| HM | Donovan McCoy | D | 6-0/200 | 11-Oct-04 | Canada | Peterborough (OHL) | 65-2-11-13 |
| HM | Cole Miller | C | 6-4/175 | 4-Feb-05 | Canada | Edmonton (WHL) | 61-10-9-19 |
| HM | Lucas Moore | D | 5-9/180 | 7-Jun-05 | Canada | Hamilton (OHL) | 65-3-25-28 |
| HM | Josh Nadeau | RW | 5-7/145 | 22-Oct-03 | Canada | Penticton (BCHL) | 54-44-66-110 |
| HM | Alexei Noskov | G | 6-2/205 | 13-Nov-04 | Russia | Taifun Primorsky Krai (MHL) | 7-26, 3.86, 0.905 |
| HM | Owen Outwater | LW | 6-2/160 | 4-Jan-05 | Canada | Kingston (OHL) | 62-16-25-41 |
| HM | Joe Palodichuk | D | 6-0/165 | 26-Feb-03 | USA | Fargo (USHL) | 44-8-21-29 |
| HM | Petr Pavelec | LW | 6-0/200 | 10-Feb-05 | Czech | HC Vitkovice (Czechia U20) | 46-8-5-13 |
| HM | Oliver Peer | RW | 6-0/165 | 9-Mar-03 | Canada | Windsor (OHL) | 63-22-45-67 |
| HM | Chris Pelosi | C | 6-1/180 | 6-Mar-05 | USA | Sioux Falls (USHL) | 43-13-6-19 |
| HM | Matthew Perkins | LW | 5-11/175 | 21-Jan-04 | Canada | Youngstown (USHL) | 60-15-29-44 |
| HM | Nico Pertuch | G | 6-2/200 | 29-Jul-05 | Germany | EV Landshut (DNL U20) | 15GP, 3.57 |
| HM | Dominik Petr | C | 6-2/165 | 30-Apr-05 | Czech | Lukko (Fin-U20) | 18-1-0-1 |
| HM | Chase Pietila | D | 6-1/180 | 3-Mar-04 | USA | Youngstown (USHL) | 60-7-29-36 |
| HM | Chase Pirtle | RW | 6-2/185 | 8-Mar-05 | USA | Mount St. Charles 18U AAA (USHS-RI) | 47-20-24-44 |
| HM | Benjamin Poitras | C | 5-10/175 | 18-Jul-05 | Canada | Sioux City (USHL) | 61-14-24-38 |
| HM | Connor Punnett | D | 6-1/200 | 16-Jun-03 | Canada | Barrie (OHL) | 66-14-34-48 |
| HM | Ivan Remezovsky | D | 6-1/165 | 8-Feb-05 | Russia | SKA-1946 St. Petersburg (MHL) | 45-0-13-13 |
| HM | Charlie Robertson | G | 6-3/165 | 2-Apr-05 | Canada | North Bay (OHL) | 12-6, 3.17, 0.892 |
| HM | Pier-Olivier Roy | D | 5-9/175 | 5-Mar-04 | Canada | Victoriaville (QMJHL) | 68-6-62-68 |
| HM | Rainers Rullers | C | 6-4/195 | 11-Dec-04 | Latvia | Zemgale (Fin-Mestis) | 46-4-6-10 |
| HM | Bennett Schimek | RW | 5-11/180 | 15-Apr-03 | USA | Providence (HE) | 37-11-9-20 |
| HM | Zach Schulz | D | 6-1/195 | 14-Jun-05 | USA | USN U18 (USDP) | 51-1-9-10 |
| HM | Magomed Sharakanov | D | 6-1/200 | 11-Oct-04 | Russia | MHK Dynamo Moskva (MHL) | 44-7-25-32 |
| HM | Cam Squires | RW | 5-11/165 | 11-Apr-05 | Canada | Cape Breton (QMJHL) | 67-30-34-64 |
| HM | Julius Sumpf | C | 6-1/175 | 11-Jan-05 | Germany | RB Hockey Juniors (AlpsHL) | 23-9-9-18 |
| HM | Alexander Suvorov | RW | 5-9/160 | 30-Nov-02 | Belarus | Severstal Cherepovets (KHL) | 47-13-11-24 |
| HM | Gabriel Szturc | C | 5-11/185 | 24-Sep-03 | Czech | Kelowna (WHL) | 56-24-55-79 |
| HM | Nikita Telegin | C | 6-1/155 | 21-Jun-05 | Russia | Belye Medvedi Chelyabinsk (MHL) | 22-6-4-10 |
| HM | Patrick Thomas | C | 5-11/160 | 21-Aug-04 | Canada | Hamilton (OHL) | 66-17-39-56 |
| HM | Hudson Thornton | D | 5-11/180 | 4-Nov-03 | Canada | Prince George (WHL) | 68-23-51-74 |
| HM | Jiri Tichacek | D | 5-9/170 | 30-Jan-03 | Czech | Rytiri Kladno (Czechia) | 39-0-6-6 |
| HM | Djibril Toure | D | 6-6/200 | 5-Jun-03 | Canada | Sudbury (OHL) | 57-5-11-16 |
| HM | Tuomas Uronen | RW | 5-11/180 | 19-Mar-05 | Finland | HIFK (Fin-U20) | 39-20-23-43 |
| HM | Noa Vali | G | 6-0/160 | 19-Apr-05 | Finland | TPS (Fin-U20) | 17-8, 2.38, 0.912 |
| HM | Nicholas Vantassell | RW | 6-4/195 | 18-Apr-04 | USA | Green Bay (USHL) | 62-19-18-37 |
| HM | Visa Vedenpaa | G | 6-2/170 | 11-May-05 | Finland | Karpat (Fin-U20) | 31GP, 0.886 |
| HM | Evgeny Volokhin | G | 6-3/170 | 6-Apr-05 | Russia | Mamonty Yugry (MHL) | 20-6, 2.12, 0.927 |
| HM | Declan Waddick | C | 5-10/170 | 24-Jan-05 | Canada | Niagara (OHL) | 64-28-21-49 |
| HM | Saige Weinstein | D | 6-0/180 | 30-May-05 | Canada | Spokane (WHL) | 57-4-14-18 |
| HM | Ethan Whitcomb | LW | 6-4/190 | 13-May-04 | Canada | Muskegon (USHL) | 53-24-24-48 |
| HM | Raul Yakupov | RW | 6-1/180 | 21-Jun-04 | Russia | Reaktor Nizhnekamsk (MHL) | 49-32-29-61 |
The million-dollar question is…are we still playing catch-up as a scouting community following the resumption of play post pandemic? Last year, this was definitely the case as leagues returned to full seasons. But are certain players still growing exponentially as they try to recover lost development time? This is particularly true of players in the CHL and in Europe, where most junior leagues halted.
For those unfamiliar, North American players with birth dates from January 1st to September 15th, will be eligible for three NHL drafts. Players with birth dates from September 16th to December 31st, will be eligible for two NHL drafts. And for European players (in European leagues), extend that eligibility by one year in both cases. Recently, NHL scouts have increased the rate with which they are selecting “re-entry” candidates, or players previously passed over. Contract limits have made it critical for teams to spread out where they select players from, in addition to their age. This has made second- and third-year eligible U.S. and European based players especially attractive. However, these players have had a lot of success in recent years too. Look around the league and you see these players everywhere. For example, Calgary Flames standout defender Mackenzie Weegar was one. Ottawa Senators standout forward Drake Batherson was one. So too was Winnipeg Jets starter Connor Hellebuyck. Standout Tampa Bay Lightning rookie defender Nick Perbix was one.
Last year, four “re-entry” candidates went in the Top 100; Dmitri Buchelnikov, Lucas Edmonds, Mikey Milne, and Aidan Thompson. In our “second chances” article last year (Part 1) (Part 2) (Part 3) we wrote about three of those four. In total there were 42 taken, right around the trend of other recent drafts (roughly about 20% of all players selected). Additionally, of those 42, we identified and wrote about 25 (over half of them) in our aforementioned second chances series. Just like in previous editions of this annual report, we aim to identify more.
In 2023, we have some very interesting candidates. Adam Gajan stole the show at this year’s WJC’s for Slovakia and has been a standout in the NAHL and USHL this year. Eric Pohlkamp was one of the MVPs of the WJAC and has been at the top of the USHL defenseman scoring race all year. Austin Roest has been top ten in WHL scoring all year long and has taken huge strides forward. This article intends to highlight them and many other candidates who could be part of that 20% this year.

We actually listed Blomquist last year in this piece and ranked him #193 in our draft guide after his breakout campaign in the J20 league. A 6 '2 netminder with a rare right handed catching glove, Blomquist ended up going undrafted (for a second time), but has returned this year even stronger. Playing with Vasteras IK in the Swedish second league, he has been the team’s best netminder this year and this earned him a spot as the third goalie on team Sweden at the WJC’s. Blomquist is athletic and aggressive in the crease and has worked hard to improve his body control, positioning, and rebound control this season now that he is playing pro. Consistency and mental focus will be the key moving forward. (Brock Otten)
A classic late bloomer, Hellnemo has emerged as one of the top young goaltenders in Sweden a year after being passed over at the draft following a disappointing year at the J20 and J18 levels. He has won five games in the SHL as a U19 player and has been arguably one of the best goalies at the J20 level when he has played there. Hellnemo is a pure stopper. His movements are very refined for a young netminder and he’s got a great glove hand that helps him protect the upper portion of the net. Rebound control is a bit of an issue at this current time, but with his play tracking ability, he has the potential to be a netminder across the pond. (Brock Otten)
A Norwegian netminder, Hagen Aarsund has emerged as the starter for the Frolunda program’s J20 team this season. As of writing this, he sits third in the league in wins and even earned a call-up to be Fredrik Dichow’s back-up for a game in the SHL. Hagen Aarsund is an ultra-aggressive, hyper athletic butterfly netminder who really covers his crease well. He’s not huge at 6’1, but he combats that by playing far out of the blue paint, tracking the play well. The second half of his season hasn’t been as strong and he’s had some trouble with consistency, but his progression this season could put him on the scouting radar. (Brock Otten)
Måns Forsfjäll has an effective two-way game, but his defensive game is where he succeeds. In the 2021-22 and 22-23 seasons, he leaped to the SHL, and Fjorsfäll didn’t look out of place while defending the higher competition. Strength and skating are two areas where Forsfjäll excels. His effort and positioning on defence make him an excellent penalty killer with the speed and smooth skating required to drive offence off the rush. Forsfjäll has the potential to be a shutdown defender who plays a depth role as the sixth or seventh defender on an NHL team who can be counted on in important moments as well as on the penalty kill. I don’t expect him to put up many points in the NHL, but he has the skills to succeed as a defensive defenseman. Forsfjäll will be ready to take a step next season if he can find a role in the AHL. (Chase Rochon)
Sjöholm is a smooth skater with good acceleration and top-end speed. He can pivot and change directions quickly, making him effective in transition and in his defensive zone. Sjöholm is a reliable defender who uses his body and sticks well to separate opponents from the puck. He has good positioning and can anticipate plays, making him effective in both man-to-man coverage and zone defence. Sjöholm is not a particularly physical player, but he is willing to engage in battles along the boards and in front of the net. He has a hard and accurate shot from the point and can contribute to the power play. Sjöholm is an intelligent player who reads the game well and makes good decisions with the puck. Sjöholm is a reliable, two-way defenseman with good skating and defensive abilities. While he may not be a significant offensive contributor, he can play a valuable role on any team and should be a solid addition to any team's prospect pool. (Chase Rochon)
Asplund is an excellent skater with great speed, agility, and balance. He has a quick first step and can accelerate well, which allows him to beat defenders and create scoring chances. His ability to change directions and maneuver in tight spaces is also impressive. Asplund has a good wrist shot and can score from various areas on the ice. He has a quick release and can get his shot off in tight spaces. Asplund is a skilled puck-handler who can stickhandle through traffic and make creative plays with the puck. He has good hands and can make saucer passes and dekes to create scoring opportunities. His ability to protect the puck and win battles along the boards is also noteworthy. Asplund is not a particularly physical player but is fearless in engaging in battles along the boards or in front of the net. He has good balance and can hold his own against bigger opponents. However, he could benefit from adding more strength to his frame. Asplund is also a skilled forward with excellent skating ability and puck skills. He has the potential to be a dynamic offensive player at the next level and has shown an ability to play a responsible two-way game. He could become a valuable player in any team's lineup with continued development and added strength. (Chase Rochon)
Erik Påhlsson is a skilled and versatile defenseman with excellent skating ability and a high hockey IQ. He has a powerful stride that allows him to cover a lot of ground quickly, and he can change direction on a dime. He has excellent agility and balance, enabling him to evade forecheckers and promptly move the puck up the ice. Påhlsson has a fantastic offensive game, thanks to his incredible vision and ability to move the puck effectively. He also possesses good offensive instincts and is unafraid to join the rush to create scoring opportunities. Påhlsson is a reliable and responsible defender who uses his mobility and positioning to defend effectively. He is not a physical player, but he makes up for it by playing smart. He is also a solid penalty killer, demonstrating his ability to shut down opponents' power plays. Erik Påhlsson is a talented defenseman who has the potential to become a valuable asset to any team. His excellent skating ability, offensive skills, and responsible defensive play make him a well-rounded player who can contribute in all situations. (Chase Rochon)
Hellberg's skating is one of his biggest strengths. He has excellent acceleration and top-end speed, which allows him to create separation from defenders and generate scoring opportunities. He also has good agility and balance, enabling him to change direction quickly and maintain control of the puck. Hellberg is an offensive-minded player who excels at creating scoring chances for himself and his teammates. He has good hands and can handle the puck in tight spaces, which makes him difficult to defend. He has a quick release and a hard, accurate shot, which he can use to beat goaltenders from any angle. He is also an influential playmaker who can set up his teammates with well-timed passes. Hellberg is a responsible two-way player who understands the importance of solid defence. He is unafraid to backcheck and uses his size and reach to disrupt opponents' offensive plays. He is also an effective penalty killer, using his speed to pressure the puck carrier and block passing lanes. His size, speed, and skill make him a dynamic offensive threat, while his defensive awareness and work ethic make him a well-rounded player. (Chase Rochon)
Carnebo has excellent skating abilities and can maneuver around the ice with great speed and agility. Carnebo has a natural ability to find the back of the net. He has a quick release on his shot and can pick his spots well. He also has a good sense of where his teammates are on the ice, which allows him to create scoring chances for them. Despite being a smaller player, Carnebo is fearless in getting physical on the ice. He is willing to battle in the corners and in front of the net and is not afraid to throw his body around to make a play. While Carnebo's offensive abilities are impressive, his defensive play could improve. He tends to focus more on the offensive side of the game, which can lead to him being caught out of position defensively. As mentioned earlier, Carnebo is a smaller player and could benefit from adding strength to his frame. This would help him better battle against larger and more physical players. (Chase Rochon)
Malm is a smooth skater who can quickly move around the ice. He has good speed and agility, which helps him keep up with opposing forwards and make plays in transition. Malm is an intelligent player who understands his defensive responsibilities well. He is able to read the space well and make quick decisions to shut down opposing forwards despite not being the biggest player on the ice. Like many young players, Malm can be inconsistent at times. He needs to bring his best game every night and avoid lapses in his play. Hampus Malm is a reliable defenseman who can shut down opposing forwards and play a physical game. While he may provide little offence at this point in his career, he has the potential to improve in that area with more experience and development. If he can work on his puck skills and consistency, he could become a valuable asset for his team at the next level. (Chase Rochon)
Interestingly enough, Lampinen was better in Mestis (the Finnish second league) last year, but it was his performance at this year’s World Junior Championship that really caught the eye of scouts. Lampinen outplayed Canucks draft pick Aku Koskenvuo by a significant margin and finished the tournament with a .933 save percentage. He’s not huge (at pushing 6’2), but he has plus athleticism and is an excellent play tracker. This gives him great upside as he fine tunes some of the technical components of his game. (Brock Otten)
In his final year of draft eligibility, the last calendar year has been a whirlwind for Jatkola. It started this summer at the make-up WJC’s, where he stole the Finnish starter’s role from Ottawa prospect Leevi Merilainen. It has since carried over to Liiga, where Jatkola has become a dependable starter at the age of 20 (he turns 21 later this September). Much like Lampinen, Jatkola relies on his quickness and athleticism because he doesn’t have a massive frame (listed at 6 '1). His improvement over the last few years has been phenomenal and as long as he continues to be aggressive in the crease, he could have a bright future. (Brock Otten)
Last season Nestor Noiva did not hear his name called in Montreal, despite a great season in U18 SM-sarja, where he scored 32 goals and 60 points in 35 games. He played a very aggressive game with his high motor, physicality and strength, making it very hard for defenders to take the puck as he evaded pressure with the combination of his puck protection skills and his acceleration. He often cuts at the top of the circle to create high-danger chances. I felt last season, Nestor's shot was holding him back from his true potential. This season has changed, and Noiva has a cannon. He still sticks to lots of slap shots and one-timers from the top of the circle like last season but now has grown with adding accuracy to his power and adapted to diversify his shot by taking more wrist and snapshots. Overall, Noiva has strong enough smarts to advance to the next level and has above-average puck skills and passing ability. Skating is the main area that will need to be progressed for Nestor to make an impact at the next level with below-average mobility and edges that force him to play a very north/south style. I think many scouts will value Novias physicality and shooting, which will translate much better in North America with his capability in tight. Teams should take a chance on him in the later rounds in hopes of eventually adding an energy-depth player into their system. (Chase Rochon)
Elmeri Laakso is not a player that will blow anyone away with flashy plays or big hits. You probably wouldn't notice him just watching a full game. This is not meant as a criticism about Laakso’s game but actually a positive component. Laakso makes minimal to no mistakes, which makes him a very reliable defenseman. The reason he wasn't chosen last year, I think, came down to his lack of aggressiveness defensively as he missed coverage in the slot from time to time, as well as his inefficiency in puck battles. These issues have been cleaned up this season, and if anything, they have become staples to Laakso’s game, showing how much he has grown and is driven by self-improvement. He plays a game that is super team-friendly, making safe, poised plays and taking the ice his opponents give. What makes Laakso really stand out for me is his shot. He can shoot from any location, at any range, and manages to always get the puck through traffic and on the net. A quick release that holds lots of power that always manages to find the net like a magnet is very impressive. Putting this all together with strong mobility, built around quick feet and tight edges, Laakso makes a great case to be selected this year. He has experience on both the PK and PP and has shown he is effective at both. Again, Elmeri Laakso will not blow anyone away with elite talent, but when he has the puck on his stick, his efficiency is impressive. (Chase Rochon)
Oiva Keskinen is a defence-first center who plays a very passive game with minimal risk. Keskinen has the most important skill a hockey player can possess, that is his smarts and awareness, which benefit him greatly. Most of Oiva’s points come from the right place, right time situations, as he always puts himself in the best position to be an option. Keskinen is most valuable in his own zone by playing as the third defenseman by taking away passing lanes and tying up attackers in the slot. You rarely catch him out of position, which shows his defence-first style of play, making him a trusted player on the ice in most situations by his coaches. Oiva is an above-average skater that I think he could use more to his advantage on the attack and when pressuring attackers. Due to his passive playstyle, the speed he is capable of isn't used to its highest potential. For Keskinen to take the next step to pro, he will need to work on his overall physical hockey skills. Hockey is a mental game but very hard to play at the next level if you do not have any elite skill level. It comes down to matter if his smarts and development continues to grow over the next few seasons. I can see Keskinen being on NHL scout’s radar this year, but I'm not sure I see him being selected. (Chase Rochon)
Yaroslav Tsulygin is a right-handed defenseman, who is mobile, competent in terms of puck skills, has a solid 6’2” frame and isn’t afraid to put it to use even though he still needs to properly fill it out. Last season, even though he showed some flashes of what he can do in the MHL, he still was a bit in a process of putting these tools into a proper toolbox, so that, combined with the COVID-limited exposure and reemergence of the Russian factor, resulted in him getting undrafted on draft day even though those raw talents likely were noticed by scouts in some way. This season he is getting regular time at the KHL level (should be mentioned that it helps that his father is the assistant coach on the team) and looks competent there at the age of just 18, which isn’t a frequent thing to see. Although some injuries slightly spoiled his season and even taking into account that there’s still a lot of progress to be made, I think this year it will be hard to ignore him, as he is clearly just getting started and his development is expected to continue. (Viktor Fomich)
This KHL season is a bit unusual as due to all the recent political events the number of KHL foreigners was basically cut to half of the usual amount. This resulted in some roster spot openings and a lot of KHL managers rightly decided those should be used as a chance for younger players to succeed in these roles. Probably the brightest example of that kind of case is right-handed defenseman Bogdan Konyushkov, as coming into his second year of draft eligibility he had yet to play in the KHL nor in the MHL, so had as little exposure as possible. That didn’t stop the new Torpedo head coach Igor Larionov from noticing him and making him a top pairing defenseman on his KHL team. Even though he isn’t extremely flashy or athletic, Konyushkov’s main asset is his hockey sense, as he is very competent at defensive positioning and puck battles. This also makes him creative in the attacking zone and it should be mentioned that he has got great hands, which allows him to be an extremely precise passer as well as an effective powerplay orchestrator. Obviously, I can’t tell you about the NHL managers and scouts, but to me this sounds like the case of a potential solid mid-to-late round investment. (Viktor Fomich)
In some ways Stanislav Yarovoi’s name was likely already familiar, after a shootout goal in the MHL earned almost two million views on youtube. However, aside from that, his performance on the junior level wasn’t remarkable to say it mildly, as the consistency just wasn’t there and he failed to convince the coaches that he deserved a proper role even at that level. Things just somehow turned around this offseason, as Yarovoi came to his KHL team’s camp much stronger and more confident than before and when he was given an opportunity in the preseason games, he just held onto it. He has taken off and is currently sitting among the top U20 scorers in the KHL. In terms of the assets aside from the aforementioned fascinating puck skills, Yarovoi is dynamic, possesses a strong and precise right-handed shot and looks to be at least not useless in terms of the two-way game. That said, there is still some inherent risk in selecting players like him who suddenly come out of nowhere to break out, but the upside here is likely significant. (Viktor Fomich)
Observations show that when a skilled young player looks comfortable playing in Russian pro leagues it is a sign that there are enough reasons to consider him a legit NHL draft candidate. However, despite looking good in the VHL in his initial draft season, winger German Tochilkin wasn’t selected in the last draft – might be because of the lack of exposure or due to the Russian factor, although him being relatively raw in terms of the all-around game also certainly contributed to that. This year he made progress in that way and not only has he looked like an offensive leader at the VHL level, but also has translated some of it to the KHL level too, as he has been loaned to Kunlun team (coached by a former AHL coach Greg Ireland) and is using his opportunities (limited, but still) there well. Tochilkin is a smooth skater with advanced puck skills, definitely knows how to put the puck into the net and also doesn’t look like a liability on his own end. A lot of progress still needs to be made, as he definitely needs to become much stronger, but his skill set looks really intriguing enough to me. (Viktor Fomich)

Passed on twice mainly due to his size (5´9”), Ticháček is a smaller and mobile defenseman whose numbers don´t scream of great potential, but his play does. He is an exceptionally smart two-way defenseman who likes to join the attack, yet doesn't forget about defense. He has shown his abilities at the last World Juniors, playing on the first pair alongside David Jiříček as one of the crucial players of the silver Czech squad. Ticháček´s best quality is probably his skating; he´s shifty, agile and has a terrific top speed. He uses his stick well and excels at both ends of the ice. However, he's not having a great season in the Czech Extraliga with Rytíři Kladno, the team Jaromír Jágr still plays on. There are still not many NHL defensemen of the said size, but Ticháček could be worth a gamble in the later rounds.
Jedlička had an impressive last year with Zvolen, finishing the season as the leading scorer on a pretty stacked team in Slovak top tier league. An injury stripped him of representing Slovakia at the Men´s World Championship and possibly improving his draft stock. The 20-year-old forward is now in his final year of eligibility. Although he had a slower start to the season, he’s now playing his best hockey. Jedlička has decent size (6´2”, 200 lbs), plays hard, physical and creates a lot of offense. He has a dangerous wrist shot and likes to shoot from various different areas around the ice. Furthermore, he´s a capable penalty killer and brings a lot of energy and grit. It's very hard not to see Jedlička moving to North America after the season. He has the potential to be an effective bottom-six, or even a middle-six winger, if he continues on the same path. (Matej Deraj)
In the past, we’ve talked about Bugl’s feats at the WJC, where he had a 4-2 record and 2.99 GAA over two tournaments. We’ve also mentioned his feats as the starter for the RB Junior’s pro team in the AlpsHL over the past two years, sporting records of 12-12 and then 13-7. None of that got him drafted, so he’s simply grabbed every opportunity he’s gotten this season as one of two back-ups for the DEL’s Straubing Tigers. And the results have been mighty impressive. After initially seeing action in six games with Straubing’s DEL2 affiliate Landshut, where he shined with a 4-2 record, 2.35 GAA, and .921 save percentage, he was then forced into DEL action when American starter Hunter Miska went down with an injury. What then ensued, Bugl has taken the whole league by storm. Hel has racked up a 15-7 record to date, often baffling opponents with a 2.36 GAA and .907 save percentage. Now we’ll have to see if one of those teams with a healthy supply of late-round picks is ready to bet on him as much as he’s continued betting on himself. Straubing quickly re-upped him for next season this past month. (Chapin Landvogt)
As opposed to Bugl, Tiefensee didn’t have anything to write home about after several hapless WJC appearances, which likely affected what was a good reputation coming out of juniors, where he unfortunately already didn’t get as many outings as you’d like to see from a market’s premiere goaltender aged 16 and 17. By the time he was 18, he was a regular back-up goalie for Heilbronn in the DEL2 (while junior leagues were shut down due to the pandemic), which exposed him to strong competition, but also a lot of time on the bench. Fast forward to the 22-23 season, where he too found himself in goal for powerhouse Mannheim while the first string goaltender was out injured. Simply put, the numbers have been fantastic. The 6’4”, 190-pound behemoth has gone 10-5 in 15 contests, sporting a top-flight 2.17 GAA (third in the DEL) and a .919 SV%. Included among his losses were scores of 1-0, 3-2, and 3-0, a game in which the opponent scored two empty-netters. He’s pitched two shutouts as well. The long and short of it is that Tiefensee is showing very good schooling and strong athleticism for a young man his size. His outings have consistently come with poise and confidence. Like Bugl, it’s difficult to imagine that he’s not garnering NHL attention just now. (Chapin Landvogt)
In recent years, we’ve been a bit of fan about Leonhardt’s often fluid game and the wherewithal he’s shown in a number of situations and scenarios. This past summer, he got into his first WJC action and promptly contributed three assists. That came on the heels of a minimal lower line role for ICEHL champs Salzburg, for whom he scored the championship-deciding goal in the playoffs. On the whole, his 17 points in 52 games were very yeomen-like, but in a situation where established veterans dominated the top 9 forward corps. The season before, he had led the RB Juniors in scoring with 35 points in 32 games in what was his initial draft year. This season, he’s moved up the totem pole again and is taking a regular shift on an all-kid line for a low-budget Nuremberg club and has five goals and 12 points in 44 games, several of those points coming in a highlight reel manner. For those who watch the league intensely, he’s noticeably had little in the way of adjustment issues and looks to be taking the same steps many of the league’s top-scoring German players took when they were his age. If by any chance selected next summer, he’d be a pick the team could likely plant in the AHL right off the bat. (Chapin Landvogt)
While leading Germany in scoring with four goals and five points at the summer WJC, TSN analysts did not hold back in praising Rossmy’s combination of size, leadership, and net-front presence, coming just short of guaranteeing he’d be drafted in 2023, but the regular season for the former U18 outfit captain hasn’t been nearly what was expected of him. He’s been mired in a 4th-line role - sometimes not even suiting up - for a very disappointing returning DEL champion in Berlin, a team that has spent the bulk of the winter fighting to stay clear of a relegation spot. Rossmy’s one goal this season was scored on November 1st, and it’s been very quiet for him all season, only having accumulated four points. The team has a DEL2 affiliate, but he’s played all of one game there, so they’re keeping him around for a reason. There are surely more than a few pundits of this scene who feel he’s been in the wrong situation for his development all season, but his performance when he was getting 10-15 minutes a game (6 games long in OCT and NOV) didn’t exactly scream “Give me more opportunity!” An assistant captain at the WJC, he missed the first two games, then only had one assist in three matchups, that coming in the nation’s one do-or-die contest against Austria, a game the team came just short of giving away over the final 10 minutes of play. And yet, he’s got all the tools and size to boot. Was his WJC performance last summer combined with mere potential enough to garner the interest necessary to be a late-round draft pick? (Chapin Landvogt)
We spent parts of last season trying to figure out who exactly the six-foot Krening really is and if there’s a diamond in the rough here. He was injured quite a bit and ended up with 10 points in 16 AlpsHL games, which is a very decent scoring pace for a first-year draft-eligible player in a pro league. He then finished the season with three assists in four games at the U18 Worlds for a very offensively challenged Team Germany. We suspected he’d be right back in the AlpsHL this season, but RB Munich of the DEL (where Julian Lutz and Maks Szuber play) needed some assistance to start the season and Krening ended up with a goal and assist in the season’s first six games. He then saw minimal ice time in a pointless seven-game debut for affiliate Salzburg in the ICEHL before landing with the Red Bull Juniors again, for whom he once again has 10 points, this time in 12 games thus far. In between, he was part of the WJC outfit, for which he collected a goal and three points over five games. Again, not too shabby all things considered. He won’t turn 19 until April and he’s had some sick leave this season as well, so it’s been hard to get a real read on just what Krening’s possibilities are. Clear is that he seems to find a way onto the scoresheet just about wherever he plays but has been without the calm of a one-team season for several years now. Of the young skipped-over men first eligible last summer, he’s definitely the player with the most potential and intrigue. He’s a lock for next winter’s WJC as well. (Chapin Landvogt)
]]>