Anaheim DucksArizona CoyotesBoston BruinsBuffalo SabresCalgary FlamesCarolina HurricanesChicago BlackhawksColorado AvalancheColumbus Blue JacketsDallas StarsDetroit Red WingsEdmonton OilersFlorida PanthersLos Angeles KingsMinnesota WildMontréal CanadiensNashville PredatorsNew Jersey DevilsNew York IslandersNew York RangersOttawa SenatorsPhiladelphia FlyersPittsburgh PenguinsSt Louis BluesSan Jose SharksSeattle KrakenTampa Bay LightningToronto Maple LeafsVancouver CanucksVegas Golden KnightsWashington CapitalsWinnipeg Jets

Kats Krunch: 2016-17 Rested Tired: Game 1 Fun

I should have posted this earlier in the season instead of after 20 games (or Q1 as I’ve been calling the four NHL quarters). The weekly breakdown by team (Starting from Monday to Sunday) is below.


With talk of a compressed schedule and a bye week, this is how the NHL plays out over the season, with a slew of teams playing through four-game weeks to close off the final three weeks of the NHL season.

I would normally present a table breaking down the rested/tired splits for NHL teams for 2016-17.

Team B2B Tired Rested % B2B Tired DIVISION
ANA 14 11 19 78.57 PACIFIC
BOS 14 11 6 78.57 ATLANTIC
BUF 19 13 6 68.42 ATLANTIC
CGY 11 10 14 90.91 PACIFIC
CAR 16 6 15 37.50 METROPOLITAN
CHI 14 8 12 57.14 CENTRAL
COL 11 5 12 45.45 CENTRAL
CBJ 19 10 7 52.63 METROPOLITAN
DAL 10 7 9 70.00 CENTRAL
DET 16 13 11 81.25 ATLANTIC
EDM 10 8 19 80.00 PACIFIC
FLA 15 10 7 66.67 ATLANTIC
L.A 16 13 12 81.25 PACIFIC
MIN 14 14 10 100.00 CENTRAL
MTL 15 9 9 60.00 ATLANTIC
NSH 13 10 7 76.92 CENTRAL
N.J 18 8 10 44.44 METROPOLITAN
NYI 16 7 13 43.75 METROPOLITAN
NYR 16 13 11 81.25 METROPOLITAN
OTT 13 7 11 53.85 ATLANTIC
PHI 18 13 7 72.22 METROPOLITAN
ARI 13 11 12 84.62 PACIFIC
PIT 15 12 15 80.00 METROPOLITAN
S.J 16 14 8 87.50 PACIFIC
STL 12 8 8 66.67 CENTRAL
T.B 16 12 13 75.00 ATLANTIC
TOR 18 14 8 77.78 ATLANTIC
VAN 16 13 6 81.25 PACIFIC
WSH 16 12 9 75.00 METROPOLITAN
WPG 14 10 6 71.43 CENTRAL


With the emergence of superior visualizations by Micah Blake McCurdy on, he offered the viz for these teams here that offers a more visually aesthetic alternative.

I urge you to go check out poke around the site – I used it extensively for the line combinations while writing the Yearbook. If you feel there’s value, please consider throwing some resources into the patreon to keep the site up and running.

Schedling Advantages/Disadvantages

In 2016-17, the Anaheim Ducks turn the tables on the Los Angeles Kings, hosting a bunch of games as a rested team against a tired team that flowed through LA first for Game 1.

For the better part of two seasons, the Kings have held a decidedly expansive advantage over teams traveling through southern California. I’ve gone into this in much more detail in this piece offering the perennial Stanley Cup contenders a scheduling advantage – that they also bungled to miss the playoffs in 2014-15 as outlined in that link.

This season, the Ducks have the advantage by a net four games – with eight teams traveling through Anaheim first before playing the rested Kings in Game 2.

League wide, this is how the advantage/disadvantage looks. Teams with the disadvantage (playing Game 1 against a team that will be playing a rested team in Game 2) appear in the first column, while teams with the advantage appear at the top.

To read the chart, find the team in the first column (the team playing Game 1) and line it up with the team across the top (rested team playing Game 2). The Kings example shows a 12 game lopsided balance here over the Ducks, and two times over the Coyotes – with some singles usually denoted as road contests through the East.

Toronto has a disadvantage of four games where teams play the rested Montreal Canadiens on the second game of a B2B.


Calgary also has a two game advantage over the Oilers in an area that experiences lots of teams traveling through both cities over two nights – sometimes playing through a rested team in Game 2.

The other pocket is in Florida where Tampa Bay holds the slight advantage in ’16-17.

Game One

When I do my rested/tired investigation on the NHL schedule, the focus usually ends up entirely on the team playing in the back-to-back situation. The focus has really been entirely on the second game of the back-to-back, focusing on the effect that it had on the tired team while pinpointing the advantage attained by the rested team.

What about the first game? What has happened in the Game 1 of those back to backs? Is there any impact or a double whammy here that could end up costly where divisional currency can potentially cost a team a playoff spot.

Clearly the second game opponent has an advantage as a rested team, but how much of the disadvantages are really being the game one opponent?

Most back-to-back situations involve teams traveling through host cities, increasing the likelihood of lining up against two teams within the same division, offering a distinct advantage to that second team above and beyond the rested advantage, the game one team clearly lacks. Via winning percentage, we see a distinct advantage in being the second game.

To isolate the effect of being a game one team, I went back from the first lockout in 2005-06 to 2015-16 (while I hate to take away data, I didn't want to use the lockout shortened season because all teams played within their conference until the Stanley Cup finals) and compiled all the games that involve the rested and tired team in both games one and two.

Turns out that teams playing game one generally had a 50-50 chance of outright winning – that’s buoyed by a percentage of extra time points), while a rested team clearly has the advantage posting an overall winning percentage over .600. While that doesn't seem to be much of a difference, with all the focus on divisional play in the margins of error for making the playoffs, the advantage of a swing through the Anaheim-LA combination, that exists in Florida, Alberta, somewhat in Ontario, and through the New York teams, can have potential playoff ramifications.

Overall the effect is still about being the team playing a rested team and again to sequence of back-to-back.

The Division columns indicate that both teams in Games 1 & 2 belong to the same division – example, Anaheim and Los Angeles or Florida/Tampa Bay.

SEASON Dis Game 1 Win% Adv Game 2 Win% Dis Game 1 Win% Adv Game 2 Win% Dis Game 1 Win% Adv Game 2 Win%
200506 0.487 0.652 0.497 0.624 0.473 0.688
200607 0.548 0.599 0.563 0.604 0.531 0.594
200708 0.489 0.619 0.497 0.623 0.477 0.614
200809 0.493 0.628 0.493 0.621 0.493 0.635
200910 0.481 0.576 0.500 0.569 0.462 0.583
201011 0.512 0.593 0.517 0.575 0.507 0.612
201112 0.500 0.645 0.522 0.701 0.479 0.591
201314 0.523 0.594 0.550 0.617 0.492 0.568
201415 0.489 0.642 0.496 0.642 0.481 0.642
201516 0.497 0.607 0.510 0.613 0.482 0.601
W% Total 0.502 0.616 0.514 0.619 0.488 0.612


It’s a little odd to see the drop off in games where the two teams involved in the back-to-back are not within the same division. The difference between a .514 and .488 win percentage is drastic over the sample used here with almost 10 years’ worth of games to analyze.

Game 2 teams are fairly consistent generating a minimum .612 winning percentage beating up a tired team.

I went through the shot differentials for these back to back sets in greater detail here. I’ve recreated the table here for teams playing back to back for reference.


Game Type Games Wins Win%
Total GP 17220 8607 0.558
Non B2B GP 14168 7222 0.569
B2B both teams 794 397 0.552
Rested B2B 2258 1270 0.596
Tired B2B 2258 988 0.495


Follow the McKeen's team on Twitter: